• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

九种樟科植物叶片鲜重与干重、表面积以及叶柄鲜重之间的收益递减情况。

Diminishing returns among lamina fresh and dry mass, surface area, and petiole fresh mass among nine Lauraceae species.

作者信息

Li Yirong, Shi Peijian, Niinemets Ülo, Song Yu, Yu Kexin, Schrader Julian, Niklas Karl J

机构信息

Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.

Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, 51006, Estonia.

出版信息

Am J Bot. 2022 Mar;109(3):377-392. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1812. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.1812
PMID:34994404
Abstract

PREMISE

The phenomenon called "diminishing returns" refers to a scaling relationship between lamina mass (M) vs. lamina area (A) in many species, i.e., M ∝ A , where α is the scaling exponent exceeding unity. Prior studies have focused on the scaling relationships between lamina dry mass (DM) and A, or between fresh mass (FM) and A. However, the scaling between petiole mass and M and A has seldom been investigated. Here, we examine the scaling relationships among FM, DM, A, and petiole fresh mass (PFM).

METHODS

For each of 3268 leaves from nine Lauraceae species, FM, DM, A, and PFM were measured, and their scaling relationships were fitted using reduced major axis regression protocols. The bootstrap percentile method was used to test the significance of the difference in α-values between any two species.

RESULTS

The phenomenon of diminishing returns was verified between FM vs. A and DM vs. A. The FM vs. A scaling relationship was statistically more robust than the DM vs. A scaling relationship based on bivariate regression r -values. Diminishing returns were also observed for the PFM vs. FM and PFM vs. A scaling relationships. The PFM vs. FM scaling relationship was statistically more robust than the PFM vs. A scaling relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

"Diminishing returns" was confirmed among the FM, DM, A, and PFM scaling relationships. The data collectively indicate that the petiole scales mechanically more strongly with lamina mass than with area, suggesting that static (self) loading takes precedence over dynamic (wind) loading.

摘要

前提

所谓“收益递减”现象是指许多物种中叶片质量(M)与叶片面积(A)之间的一种比例关系,即M ∝ A ,其中α为超过1的比例指数。先前的研究主要关注叶片干质量(DM)与A之间或鲜质量(FM)与A之间的比例关系。然而,叶柄质量与M和A之间的比例关系很少被研究。在此,我们研究FM、DM、A和叶柄鲜质量(PFM)之间的比例关系。

方法

对9种樟科植物的3268片叶子分别测量FM、DM、A和PFM,并使用主轴回归协议拟合它们的比例关系。采用自助百分位数法检验任意两个物种之间α值差异的显著性。

结果

FM与A以及DM与A之间验证了收益递减现象。基于双变量回归r值,FM与A的比例关系在统计学上比DM与A的比例关系更稳健。PFM与FM以及PFM与A的比例关系也观察到收益递减。PFM与FM的比例关系在统计学上比PFM与A的比例关系更稳健。

结论

在FM、DM、A和PFM的比例关系中证实了“收益递减”。这些数据共同表明,叶柄与叶片质量的机械比例关系比与面积的更强,这表明静态(自身)负载优先于动态(风)负载。

相似文献

1
Diminishing returns among lamina fresh and dry mass, surface area, and petiole fresh mass among nine Lauraceae species.九种樟科植物叶片鲜重与干重、表面积以及叶柄鲜重之间的收益递减情况。
Am J Bot. 2022 Mar;109(3):377-392. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1812. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
2
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
3
"Diminishing returns" for leaves of five age-groups of Phyllostachys edulis culms.毛竹五个年龄组竹秆叶片的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2021 Sep;108(9):1662-1672. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1738. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
4
Influence of tree size on the scaling relationships of lamina and petiole traits: A case study using Decne.树木大小对叶片和叶柄性状缩放关系的影响:以Decne.为例的案例研究
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 19;14(7):e70066. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70066. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Influence of Leaf Age on the Scaling Relationships of Lamina Mass vs. Area.叶龄对叶片质量与面积缩放关系的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 8;13:860206. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.860206. eCollection 2022.
6
Leaf-age and petiole biomass play significant roles in leaf scaling theory.叶龄和叶柄生物量在叶片比例理论中起着重要作用。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 21;14:1322245. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1322245. eCollection 2023.
7
"Diminishing returns" and leaf area-biomass scaling of ferns in subtropical ecosystems.亚热带生态系统中蕨类植物的“收益递减”与叶面积-生物量缩放关系
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 27;14:1187704. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1187704. eCollection 2023.
8
"Diminishing returns" in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, Southeast China.中国东南部武夷山竹子叶面积与干质量缩放中的“收益递减”
Am J Bot. 2017 Jul;104(7):993-998. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700068. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of leaf physiognomy.我们是否低估了叶片大小在植物经济学中的重要性?叶相谱内支撑成本的非比例缩放。
Ann Bot. 2007 Aug;100(2):283-303. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm107. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
10
Geographic Variation in the Petiole-Lamina Relationship of 325 Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Woody Species: Analysis in Three Dimensions.325种青海东部-西藏木本植物叶柄-叶片关系的地理变异:三维分析
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 28;12:748125. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.748125. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Scaling Relationships Among the Floral Organs of var. : Implications for Reproductive Allocation and Floral Proportionalities.var. 花器官之间的比例关系:对繁殖分配和花比例的影响
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;14(15):2446. doi: 10.3390/plants14152446.
2
Scaling of cotyledon and primary leaf mass versus area in seedlings under different light conditions.不同光照条件下幼苗子叶和初生叶的质量与面积缩放关系
AoB Plants. 2024 Sep 25;16(5):plae054. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plae054. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
The "Leafing Intensity Premium" Hypothesis and the Scaling Relationships of the Functional Traits of Bamboo Species.
“出叶强度溢价”假说与竹种功能性状的缩放关系
Plants (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;13(16):2340. doi: 10.3390/plants13162340.
4
Influence of tree size on the scaling relationships of lamina and petiole traits: A case study using Decne.树木大小对叶片和叶柄性状缩放关系的影响:以Decne.为例的案例研究
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 19;14(7):e70066. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70066. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Comparison of four performance models in quantifying the inequality of leaf and fruit size distribution.四种性能模型在量化叶片和果实大小分布不平等性方面的比较。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):e11072. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11072. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Leaf-age and petiole biomass play significant roles in leaf scaling theory.叶龄和叶柄生物量在叶片比例理论中起着重要作用。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 21;14:1322245. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1322245. eCollection 2023.
7
The morphology and nutrient content drive the leaf carbon capture and economic trait variations in subtropical bamboo forest.形态特征和养分含量驱动亚热带竹林叶片碳捕获及经济性状变异。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Apr 4;14:1137487. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1137487. eCollection 2023.
8
Twigs of dove tree in high-latitude region tend to increase biomass accumulation in vegetative organs but decrease it in reproductive organs.高纬度地区珙桐的小枝倾向于增加营养器官中的生物量积累,但减少生殖器官中的生物量积累。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 13;13:1088955. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1088955. eCollection 2022.
9
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
10
Response of leaf stoichiometry of to elevation in China's Qilian Mountains.中国祁连山地区叶片化学计量特征对海拔升高的响应。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Sep 26;13:941357. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.941357. eCollection 2022.