• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低位直肠吻合的高度选择性转流个体化管理:单中心队列的术后生化随访和长期结果。

Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort.

机构信息

Surgical Oncologic Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France.

Biometrics Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2514-2524. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2
PMID:34994889
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA).

METHODS

In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%; p = 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively (p = 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively (p = 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively (p = 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.

摘要

背景

预防性造口术(DS)可以降低吻合口相关并发症(AL)的发生率。自 2010 年以来,我们对低位直肠结肠吻合术(LCRA)采用了个体化、高度选择性的 DS 管理。

方法

共 433 例直肠癌患者接受了相同的标准化手术。非造口术(NS)管理用于无手术困难、结肠准备良好且吻合质量良好的患者。在所有其他情况下,都使用 DS。术后随访期间测量 C 反应蛋白。根据性别、年龄、体重指数、肿瘤位置和美国麻醉医师协会评分,采用倾向评分匹配调整初始人群的不平衡。记录术后 30 天内 AL 的发生率、5 年总生存率、局部无复发生存率和无病生存率。

结果

吻合术主要为超低位,腹腔镜或机器人手术均可完成。AL 的总体发生率为 13.4%,两组之间无显著差异(DS 组 12.2%,NS 组 14.6%;p=0.575)。NS 组的手术时间、出血量和住院时间明显较低。总的二次造口率为 11.4%。病理结果相似,R0 切除率为 98%。NS 组和 DS 组的中位随访时间分别为 5.5 年,总生存率分别为 84.9%和 73.4%(p=0.064),无病生存率分别为 67.0%和 55.8%(p=0.095),局部无复发生存率分别为 95.2%和 88.7%(p=0.084)。总的长期无造口率为 89.1%。

结论

对 LCRA 进行个体化 DS 似乎是安全的,并且可以在术后发病率方面提供潜在的益处,同时 NS 患者的长期肿瘤学结果相同。应开展前瞻性、多中心研究来验证这种方法。

相似文献

1
Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort.低位直肠吻合的高度选择性转流个体化管理:单中心队列的术后生化随访和长期结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2514-2524. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Current practice in Australia and New Zealand for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery with anastomosis: Analysis of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit.澳大利亚和新西兰在直肠肿瘤手术后行预防性回肠造口术的现状:澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠肿瘤联合登记处分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;23(6):1421-1433. doi: 10.1111/codi.15607. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer.低位前切除术治疗直肠癌吻合口漏的长期结果。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07109-4.
4
The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.粪便转流在低位直肠癌中的作用:对 1791 例接受直肠癌切除术和吻合术的癌症患者(有和无近端造口术)的回顾性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jun;15(6):e309-16. doi: 10.1111/codi.12248.
5
Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.直肠癌低位前切除术后选择性去功能化造口的评估
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;23(3):283-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0380-1. Epub 2007 Sep 2.
6
Transumbilical defunctioning ileostomy: A new approach for patients at risks of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.经脐预防性回肠造口术:腹腔镜低位前切除术吻合口漏风险患者的新方法。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Nov;33(11):5011-5.
7
Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.去功能化造口对低位结直肠吻合术和结肠J袋肛管吻合术后渗漏率的影响。
Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00790.x.
8
Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer.直肠癌 TME 后常规转为高度选择性低位吻合转流术的机构变革的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;44(8):1220-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study.经肛门管状引流在直肠癌前切除术后能否降低吻合口漏的发生率?单中心前瞻性随机研究。
World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1367-77. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1053-3.
10
Conservative management is associated with a decreased risk of definitive stoma after anastomotic leakage complicating sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.保守治疗与保肛直肠肿瘤切除术后吻合口漏导致确定性造口的风险降低有关。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):632-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02252.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.比较单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与三孔阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎术后采用加速康复外科方案的术后结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;37(4):232-238. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Impact of early biochemical diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: long-term results from GRECCAR 5 trial.直肠癌手术后吻合口漏早期生化诊断的影响:GRECCAR 5试验的长期结果
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):605-608. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab003.
3
Current practice in Australia and New Zealand for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery with anastomosis: Analysis of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit.
澳大利亚和新西兰在直肠肿瘤手术后行预防性回肠造口术的现状:澳大利亚和新西兰结直肠肿瘤联合登记处分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;23(6):1421-1433. doi: 10.1111/codi.15607. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Does A Longer Waiting Period After Neoadjuvant Radio-chemotherapy Improve the Oncological Prognosis of Rectal Cancer?: Three Years' Follow-up Results of the Greccar-6 Randomized Multicenter Trial.新辅助放化疗后等待时间延长是否能改善直肠癌的肿瘤预后?:Greccar-6 随机多中心试验三年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):747-754. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003530.
5
Protective Diversion Stoma in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.直肠癌低位前切除术中的保护性转流造口:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Visc Med. 2019 Jun;35(3):156-160. doi: 10.1159/000497168. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Surgery: Role of the Ghost Ileostomy.直肠手术中的吻合口漏:回肠造口幽灵术的作用
Anticancer Res. 2019 Jun;39(6):2975-2983. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13429.
7
Ultralow anterior resection with implantation of gentamicin-collagen sponge and no defunctioning stoma: anastomotic leakage and local cancer relapse.超低位前切除术联合使用庆大霉素-胶原海绵植入和无预防性造口术:吻合口漏和局部癌症复发。
Radiol Oncol. 2019 Mar 3;53(1):77-84. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0008.
8
Comparison of anastomotic leakage rate and reoperation rate between transanal tube placement and defunctioning stoma after anterior resection: A network meta-analysis of clinical data.经肛门置管与预防性回肠造口术在前切除术治疗后吻合口漏和再次手术率的比较:临床数据的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1301-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.182. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review.直肠癌的延迟结肠肛管吻合术:盆腔发病率、功能结果和肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价
World J Surg. 2019 May;43(5):1360-1369. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04918-y.
10
Should They Stay or Should They Go? The Utility of C-Reactive Protein in Predicting Readmission and Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Resection.他们该留下还是该离开?C反应蛋白在预测结直肠切除术后再入院和吻合口漏方面的作用
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):241-247. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001225.