• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I.C.I. 35868 - 制剂变更对静脉注射后疼痛发生率的影响

I.C.I. 35868 - The effect of a change of formulation on the incidence of pain after intravenous injection.

作者信息

Kay B, Rolly G

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1977;28(4):317-22.

PMID:349998
Abstract

I.C.I. 35868 is a promising new intravenous induction agent, but intravenous injection of the initial 2% formulation frequently caused pain. The solvent vehicle of the 2% formulation, which contained Cremophor E.L. and ethanol, was therefore investigated to see if this could be the cause of the pain. Twenty volunteers received both 5 ml isotonic saline and 5 ml solvent vehicle intravenously. The injection of saline never caused pain, but the solvent caused mild or moderate pain in 9 patients. I.C.I. 35868 was therefore reformulated in a 1% solution, excluding ethanol from the solvent. When intravenous injection of I.C.I. 35868 1% was compared to methohexitone 1% in 24 patients, both agents caused pain. Four out of 12 patients reveiving I.C.I. 35868 1% felt pain, with a total pain "score" of 6, but 6 out of 12 patients who received methohexitone 1%, felt pain, with a total pain "score" of 12. In no instance was intravenous injection followed by persistant pain, or evidence of thrombosis or phlebitis.

摘要

ICI 35868是一种很有前景的新型静脉诱导剂,但静脉注射初始的2%制剂时经常会引起疼痛。因此,对含有聚氧乙烯蓖麻油(Cremophor E.L.)和乙醇的2%制剂的溶剂载体进行了研究,以确定这是否是疼痛的原因。20名志愿者分别静脉注射了5毫升等渗盐水和5毫升溶剂载体。注射盐水从未引起疼痛,但溶剂在9名患者中引起了轻度或中度疼痛。因此,ICI 35868被重新配制为1%的溶液,溶剂中不含乙醇。在24名患者中,将1%的ICI 35868静脉注射与1%的美索比妥进行比较时,两种制剂都引起了疼痛。接受1%的ICI 35868的12名患者中有4名感到疼痛,总疼痛“评分”为6,但接受1%的美索比妥的12名患者中有6名感到疼痛,总疼痛“评分”为12。静脉注射后从未出现持续性疼痛,也没有血栓形成或静脉炎的迹象。

相似文献

1
I.C.I. 35868 - The effect of a change of formulation on the incidence of pain after intravenous injection.I.C.I. 35868 - 制剂变更对静脉注射后疼痛发生率的影响
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1977;28(4):317-22.
2
I.C.I. 35868, a new intravenous induction agent.I.C.I. 35868,一种新型静脉诱导剂。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1977;28(4):303-16.
3
[Etomidate using a new solubilizer. Experimental clinical studies on venous tolerance and bioavailability].
Anaesthesist. 1990 Oct;39(10):475-80.
4
Propofol ('Diprivan') for outpatient cystoscopy. Efficacy and recovery compared with althesin and methohexitone.用于门诊膀胱镜检查的丙泊酚(“得普利麻”)。与阿法沙龙及美索比妥相比的疗效和恢复情况。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:108-14.
5
Use of an emulsion formulation of propofol ('Diprivan') in intravenous anaesthesia for termination of pregnancy. A comparison with methohexitone.丙泊酚(“得普利麻”)乳剂配方用于终止妊娠的静脉麻醉。与美索比妥的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:129-31.
6
Pain on i.v. injection of propofol (ICI 35 868) in emulsion formulation. Short communication.丙泊酚(ICI 35 868)乳剂静脉注射时的疼痛。简短通讯。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Aug;29(6):651-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02274.x.
7
Venous sequelae after intravenous propofol ('Diprivan')--a comparison with methohexitone in short anaesthesia.静脉注射丙泊酚(“得普利麻”)后的静脉后遗症——与美索比妥用于短时间麻醉的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1985;61 Suppl 3:162-4.
8
Clinical studies on induction agents. 28. A further comparison of venous complications following thiopentone, methohexitone and propanidid.诱导剂的临床研究。28. 硫喷妥钠、甲己炔巴比妥和丙泮尼地静脉并发症的进一步比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1969 Aug;41(8):681-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/41.8.681.
9
Propofol for electroconvulsive therapy. A comparison with methohexitone. Preliminary report.丙泊酚用于电休克治疗:与美索比妥的比较。初步报告
Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:61-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09073.x.
10
ICI 35868 (Diprivan): a new intravenous induction agent. A comparison with methohexitone.ICI 35868(丙泊酚):一种新型静脉诱导剂。与美索比妥的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1980 Dec;35(12):1188-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1980.tb05076.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Combination of Ketamine and Propofol (Ketofol) on Cerebral Oxygenation in Neurosurgical Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.氯胺酮与丙泊酚联合使用(氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂)对神经外科手术患者脑氧合的影响:一项随机双盲对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):643-648. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_119_19. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Metabolic Profiles of Propofol and Fospropofol: Clinical and Forensic Interpretative Aspects.丙泊酚和福泊酚的代谢谱:临床和法医解释方面。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 24;2018:6852857. doi: 10.1155/2018/6852857. eCollection 2018.
3
Comparison of propofol and desflurane for postanaesthetic morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal SAH: a randomized clinical trial.
丙泊酚与地氟醚用于动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血手术患者麻醉后并发症的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):250-258. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2474-z. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Novel propofol derivatives and implications for anesthesia practice.新型丙泊酚衍生物及其对麻醉实践的意义。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):9-15. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202205.
5
Capsaicin did not evoke pain from human hand vein segments but did so after injections into the paravascular tissue.辣椒素不会引起人手静脉段疼痛,但注入血管周围组织后会引起疼痛。
J Physiol. 1993 Apr;463:491-9. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019607.