Wang Qiang, Zhang Lei, Zhang Jiechun, Ye Zhihao, Li Ping, Wang Feng, Cao Yili, Zhang Shaojun, Zhou Fang, Ai Zisheng, Zhao Nan
Department of Medical Statistics, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 24;12:800047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.800047. eCollection 2021.
The burden of personality disorders (PDs) in China is large and the focus on mental health services is increasing. However, there is a lack of sufficient evidence regarding the prevalence of comorbid PD in psychotic and non-psychotic disorders, and whether PDs have different distributions. We aimed to investigate the PD comorbidity distribution pattern between psychotic and non-psychotic disorders using a clinical population-based study. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1,497 patients in Shanghai. PDs were screened using the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire Fourth Edition Plus (PDQ-4+). All patients were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) Axis II (SCID-II). We compared the differences in PD comorbidities classified as the 10 types of PDs in the DSM-IV, in 531 patients with psychosis and 966 patients with non-psychotic disorders. More than one-third (37%) of patients with psychotic disorders met the criteria of at least one PD. Approximately half (46%) of patients with non-psychotic disorders met the criteria of at least one PD. Patients with non-psychotic disorders were more likely to meet the criteria of borderline (χ = 20.154, < 0.001) and obsessive-compulsive PD (χ = 21.164, < 0.001) diagnoses compared to those with psychotic disorders. In contrast, patients with psychotic disorders were more likely to meet the criteria of paranoid (χ = 11.144, = 0.001) and schizotypal PD (χ = 14.004, < 0.001) diagnoses than those with non-psychotic disorders. PD comorbidity is common and comorbidity distribution pattern is varied in patients with psychotic and non-psychotic disorders, implicating the development of specific strategies that could screen and assess PDs in psychiatric clinical practice.
中国人格障碍(PDs)的负担较重,且对心理健康服务的关注日益增加。然而,关于精神病性和非精神病性障碍中共病PDs的患病率以及PDs是否具有不同分布,目前缺乏充分的证据。我们旨在通过一项基于临床人群的研究,调查精神病性和非精神病性障碍之间PD共病的分布模式。我们对上海的1497名患者进行了横断面研究。使用《人格诊断问卷第四版升级版》(PDQ-4+)对PDs进行筛查。所有患者均使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)轴II的结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)进行访谈。我们比较了531例精神病患者和966例非精神病性障碍患者中,按照DSM-IV中10种PD类型分类的PD共病差异。超过三分之一(37%)的精神病性障碍患者符合至少一种PD的标准。约一半(46%)的非精神病性障碍患者符合至少一种PD的标准。与精神病性障碍患者相比,非精神病性障碍患者更有可能符合边缘型(χ = 20.154,P < 0.001)和强迫型PD(χ = 21.164,P < 0.001)的诊断标准。相比之下,与非精神病性障碍患者相比,精神病性障碍患者更有可能符合偏执型(χ = 11.144,P = 0.001)和分裂型PD(χ = 14.004,P < 0.001)的诊断标准。PD共病很常见,且在精神病性和非精神病性障碍患者中共病分布模式各不相同,这意味着需要制定特定策略,以便在精神科临床实践中筛查和评估PDs。