• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真假新闻的评估:论智力、个性、人际信任、意识形态态度和新闻消费的作用。

The evaluation of fake and true news: on the role of intelligence, personality, interpersonal trust, ideological attitudes, and news consumption.

作者信息

Sindermann Cornelia, Schmitt Helena Sophia, Rozgonjuk Dmitri, Elhai Jon D, Montag Christian

机构信息

Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Mar 27;7(3):e06503. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503
PMID:33869829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8035512/
Abstract

Individual differences in cognitive abilities and personality help to understand individual differences in various human behaviors. Previous work investigated individual characteristics in light of believing (i.e., misclassifying) fake news. However, only little is known about the misclassification of true news as fake, although it appears equally important to correctly identify fake and true news for unbiased belief formation. An online study with = 530 ( = 396 men) participants was conducted to investigate performance in a Fake and True News Test in association with i) performance in fluid and crystallized intelligence tests and the Big Five Inventory, and ii) news consumption as a mediating variable between individual characteristics and performance in the Fake and True News Test. Results showed that fluid intelligence was negatively correlated with believing fake news (the association did not remain significant in a regression model); crystallized intelligence was negatively linked to misclassifying true news. Extraversion was negatively and crystallized intelligence was positively associated with fake and true news discernment. The number of different news sources consumed correlated negatively with misclassifying true news and positively with fake and true news discernment. However, no meaningful mediation effect of news consumption was observed. Only interpersonal trust was negatively related to misclassifying both fake and true news as well as positively related to news discernment. The present findings reveal that underlying factors of believing fake news and misclassifying true news are mostly different. Strategies that might help to improve the abilities to identify both fake and true news based on the present findings are discussed.

摘要

认知能力和个性的个体差异有助于理解人类各种行为中的个体差异。先前的研究从相信(即误判)假新闻的角度调查了个体特征。然而,对于将真实新闻误判为假新闻的情况却知之甚少,尽管正确识别假新闻和真实新闻对于形成无偏见的信念似乎同样重要。我们进行了一项有530名参与者(396名男性)的在线研究,以调查在真假新闻测试中的表现与以下因素的关联:i)流体智力和晶体智力测试以及大五人格量表中的表现;ii)新闻消费作为个体特征与真假新闻测试表现之间的中介变量。结果表明,流体智力与相信假新闻呈负相关(在回归模型中这种关联不再显著);晶体智力与将真实新闻误判呈负相关。外向性与真假新闻辨别呈负相关,晶体智力与真假新闻辨别呈正相关。所消费的不同新闻来源数量与将真实新闻误判呈负相关,与真假新闻辨别呈正相关。然而,未观察到新闻消费有有意义的中介效应。只有人际信任与将假新闻和真实新闻都误判呈负相关,与新闻辨别呈正相关。本研究结果表明,相信假新闻和将真实新闻误判的潜在因素大多不同。基于本研究结果,讨论了可能有助于提高识别假新闻和真实新闻能力的策略。

相似文献

1
The evaluation of fake and true news: on the role of intelligence, personality, interpersonal trust, ideological attitudes, and news consumption.真假新闻的评估:论智力、个性、人际信任、意识形态态度和新闻消费的作用。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 27;7(3):e06503. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Social Psychological Predictors of Belief in Fake News in the Run-Up to the 2019 Hungarian Elections: The Importance of Conspiracy Mentality Supports the Notion of Ideological Symmetry in Fake News Belief.2019年匈牙利大选前夕假新闻信念的社会心理预测因素:阴谋心态的重要性支持了假新闻信念中意识形态对称性的观点。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848. eCollection 2021.
3
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.懒惰而非偏见:党派虚假新闻的易感性可以更好地用缺乏推理来解释,而不是用动机推理来解释。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.谁容易相信假新闻?易受胡编乱造影响、过度自信、熟悉度和分析思维的作用。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
6
Could Belief in Fake News Predict Vaccination Behavior in the Elderly?相信假新闻能预测老年人的疫苗接种行为吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 12;19(22):14901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214901.
7
False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.虚假记忆与新冠疫情:人们如何在数字环境中轻信有关新冠疫情的假新闻。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:972004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972004. eCollection 2022.
8
Gamified inoculation interventions do not improve discrimination between true and fake news: Reanalyzing existing research with receiver operating characteristic analysis.游戏化接种干预措施并不能提高真假新闻之间的辨别能力:使用受试者工作特征分析对现有研究进行重新分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2411-2437. doi: 10.1037/xge0001395. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.依赖情感会促进对假新闻的信任。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
10
Determinants of individuals' belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news.虚假新闻信仰的决定因素:范围综述虚假新闻信仰的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253717. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Fake news, real needs: A qualitative study on Sino-Japanese theurgy fighting.假新闻,真实需求:关于中日神术之争的定性研究
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 24;11(3):e42255. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42255. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
2
The spread of fake news: Disclosure willingness role.假新闻的传播:披露意愿的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 15;10(14):e34468. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34468. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
3
Information literacy in the digital age: information sources, evaluation strategies, and perceived teaching competences of pre-service teachers.数字时代的信息素养:职前教师的信息来源、评估策略及感知到的教学能力
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 15;15:1336436. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336436. eCollection 2024.
4
Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality.对人工智能的态度:测量及其与个性的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 5;14(1):2909. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53335-2.
5
Personality and misinformation.个性与错误信息。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Feb;55:101752. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101752. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
6
The Influence of News Consumption Habits and Dispositional Traits on Trust in Medical Scientists.新闻消费习惯和性格特质对医学科学家信任的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 17;20(10):5842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105842.
7
Linking primary emotional traits to ideological attitudes and personal value types.将主要情绪特质与意识形态态度和个人价值观类型联系起来。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 3;18(1):e0279885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279885. eCollection 2023.
8
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Rev Rhum Ed Fr. 2022 Dec;89(6):555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.rhum.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
9
Fake news: Why do we believe it?假新闻:我们为什么会相信它?
Joint Bone Spine. 2022 Jul;89(4):105371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
10
Social Psychological Predictors of Belief in Fake News in the Run-Up to the 2019 Hungarian Elections: The Importance of Conspiracy Mentality Supports the Notion of Ideological Symmetry in Fake News Belief.2019年匈牙利大选前夕假新闻信念的社会心理预测因素:阴谋心态的重要性支持了假新闻信念中意识形态对称性的观点。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:790848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.关于易受虚假政治新闻影响的简短综述。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
2
Age, gender, personality, ideological attitudes and individual differences in a person's news spectrum: how many and who might be prone to "filter bubbles" and "echo chambers" online?年龄、性别、个性、思想态度以及个人在新闻偏好方面的差异:有多少人以及哪些人可能容易在网上陷入“过滤气泡”和“回音室”?
Heliyon. 2020 Jan 17;6(1):e03214. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03214. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.假新闻,快与慢:深思熟虑减少对虚假(而非真实)新闻标题的信任。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1608-1613. doi: 10.1037/xge0000729. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
4
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.谁容易相信假新闻?易受胡编乱造影响、过度自信、熟悉度和分析思维的作用。
J Pers. 2020 Apr;88(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12476. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits.关于阴谋论信念的心理学研究的系统评价与荟萃分析:领域特征、测量工具以及与人格特质的关联
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 11;10:205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205. eCollection 2019.
6
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.推特上 2016 年美国总统大选期间假新闻的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2.
7
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.懒惰而非偏见:党派虚假新闻的易感性可以更好地用缺乏推理来解释,而不是用动机推理来解释。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Teasing Apart Overclaiming, Overconfidence, and Socially Desirable Responding.区分过度声称、过度自信和社会期望反应。
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):351-363. doi: 10.1177/1073191117700268. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
Hebb and Cattell: The Genesis of the Theory of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence.赫布与卡特尔:流体智力与晶体智力理论的起源
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 15;10:606. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00606. eCollection 2016.
10
Creativity and Cognitive Skills among : Thinking Too Much and Creating Too Little.论创造力与认知技能:想得太多而创造太少
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 25;7:1626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01626. eCollection 2016.