• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳定型白癜风中吸疱表皮移植与自动疱表皮微移植的对比研究。

A comparative study of suction blister epidermal grafting and automated blister epidermal micrograft in stable vitiligo.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, No.5, Fushin Street, Taoyuan, Keelung Branch, Linkou, Taipei, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04299-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-04299-0
PMID:35013472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8748709/
Abstract

The automated blister epidermal micrograft (ABEM) is a newly introduced surgical transplantation for refractory vitiligo. Comparative analysis of other surgical methods is lacking. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy, safety, and experience of ABEM with conventional suction blister epidermal graft (SBEG). A total of 118 anatomically based vitiligo lesions from 75 patients were included. The primary outcome was the degree of repigmentation; the patient and operator experience were evaluated. SBEG had a significantly greater incidence of repigmentation (p < 0.001), as measured by the Physician Global Assessment, as well as improvements in the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index, particularly on the face/neck area (p < 0.001). ABEM, on the contrary, had reduced donor harvest time, a better patient operative experience, and more significant Dermatology Life Quality Index improvements. In a subgroup of 38 lesions from ten patients who received both SBEG and ABEM concomitantly, there was no difference in the degree of repigmentation in the same recipient area. Overall, the degree of repigmentation for SBEG is higher than ABEM, especially in the mobilized region, and the cost is less expensive. On the contrary, ABEM requires less procedure learning curve and can supply a greater transplanting zone with shorter donor site recovery. Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of two blister grafting procedures is essential for optimal surgical outcomes for vitiligo grafting.

摘要

自动水疱表皮微移植(ABEM)是一种新引入的难治性白癜风外科移植方法。缺乏对其他手术方法的比较分析。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了 ABEM 与常规吸疱表皮移植(SBEG)在疗效、安全性和经验方面的差异。共纳入 75 例患者的 118 个解剖学基础的白癜风病变。主要结局是复色程度;评估了患者和操作者的经验。SBEG 的复色程度显著更高(p<0.001),这是根据医生总体评估得出的,并且在白癜风面积评分指数上也有改善,特别是在面部/颈部区域(p<0.001)。相反,ABEM 减少了供体采集时间,患者手术体验更好,皮肤病生活质量指数改善更明显。在十个同时接受 SBEG 和 ABEM 的患者的 38 个病变的亚组中,同一受区的复色程度没有差异。总的来说,SBEG 的复色程度高于 ABEM,尤其是在动员区域,且成本更低。相反,ABEM 所需的手术学习曲线更少,可以用较短的供区恢复时间提供更大的移植区。了解两种水疱移植程序的优缺点对于获得最佳的白癜风移植手术效果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/763c1c5cec47/41598_2021_4299_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/c8ab669d8508/41598_2021_4299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/c45fab0082b1/41598_2021_4299_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/fb0af8a17877/41598_2021_4299_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/763c1c5cec47/41598_2021_4299_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/c8ab669d8508/41598_2021_4299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/c45fab0082b1/41598_2021_4299_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/fb0af8a17877/41598_2021_4299_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7752/8748709/763c1c5cec47/41598_2021_4299_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative study of suction blister epidermal grafting and automated blister epidermal micrograft in stable vitiligo.稳定型白癜风中吸疱表皮移植与自动疱表皮微移植的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04299-0.
2
Comparison between autologous noncultured epidermal cell suspension and suction blister epidermal grafting in stable vitiligo: a randomized study.自体非培养表皮细胞悬液与水疱吸刮表皮移植治疗稳定期白癜风的随机对照研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Dec;167(6):1295-301. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12007.
3
Punch grafting versus suction blister epidermal grafting in the treatment of stable lip vitiligo.冲孔移植术与吸疱表皮移植术治疗稳定期唇部白癜风的对比
Dermatol Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):166-78; discussion 178. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34034.x. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
4
Long-Term Effects and Prognosis Following Suction Blister Epidermal Grafting in Vitiligo Patients.白癜风患者吸疱表皮移植后的长期效果及预后
J Cutan Med Surg. 2024 May-Jun;28(3):264-268. doi: 10.1177/12034754241238717. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Ultrathin Skin Grafting Versus Suction Blister Epidermal Grafting in the Treatment of Resistant Stable Vitiligo: A Self-Controlled Comparative Study.超薄皮片移植与负压吸疱表皮移植治疗稳定期复发性白癜风的自身对照研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2023 Jul 1;49(7):659-663. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003780. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Suction blister epidermal grafting versus punch skin grafting in recalcitrant and stable vitiligo.顽固性及稳定期白癜风的吸引水疱表皮移植与打孔植皮对比研究
Dermatol Surg. 1999 Dec;25(12):955-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99069.x.
7
A self-controlled comparative study of mini punch graft versus suction blister epidermal graft in the treatment of stable vitiligo.微型打孔移植与负压吸疱表皮移植治疗稳定期白癜风的自身对照研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Sep;32(6):585-589. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1687827. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Suction blister grafting for vitiligo: efficacy and clinical predictive factors.白癜风的吸疱移植术:疗效及临床预测因素
Dermatol Surg. 2015 May;41(5):633-9. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000341.
9
Suction blister epidermal grafting using a modified suction method in the treatment of stable vitiligo: a retrospective study.改良负压吸疱法表皮移植术治疗稳定期白癜风的回顾性研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):999-1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01966.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
10
A prospective study to assess the efficacy of various surgical modalities in treatment of stable vitiligo patches over resistant sites.一项前瞻性研究评估了各种手术方式在治疗抵抗部位稳定型白癜风斑块中的疗效。
Int J Dermatol. 2020 Jul;59(7):837-842. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14924. Epub 2020 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging tissue-resident memory T cells for non-invasive immune monitoring via microneedle skin patches.利用组织驻留记忆T细胞通过微针皮肤贴片进行非侵入性免疫监测。
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 21:2025.03.17.25324099. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.17.25324099.
2
Consensus statement on the surgical management of vitiligo.白癜风外科治疗的共识声明。
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jan-Mar;18(1):27-33. doi: 10.25259/JCAS_117_2024. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
Growth factors IGF-1 and KGF and adipose-derived stem cells promote migration and viability of primary human keratinocytes in an wound model.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of automated epidermal micrograft in patients with stable segmental and nonsegmental vitiligo.自动表皮微小皮片移植治疗稳定期节段型和非节段型白癜风患者的疗效与安全性
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jul;21(7):2924-2930. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14548. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Surgical Interventions for Patients With Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.手术干预治疗白癜风患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Mar 1;157(3):307-316. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5756.
3
Vitiligo: A Review.白癜风:综述。
生长因子IGF-1和KGF以及脂肪来源干细胞在伤口模型中促进原代人角质形成细胞的迁移和活力。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 6;12:1516116. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1516116. eCollection 2025.
4
Vitiligo: From mechanisms of disease to treatable pathways.白癜风:从发病机制到可治疗途径
Skin Health Dis. 2024 Sep 30;4(6):e460. doi: 10.1002/ski2.460. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Management of the refractory vitiligo patient: current therapeutic strategies and future options.难治性白癜风患者的管理:当前治疗策略和未来选择。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 4;14:1294919. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1294919. eCollection 2023.
6
Noninvasive Imaging Techniques for Monitoring Cellular Response to Treatment in Stable Vitiligo.用于监测稳定期白癜风细胞对治疗反应的非侵入性成像技术
J Invest Dermatol. 2024 Apr;144(4):912-915.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.006. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
7
Disease Awareness and Treatment Preferences in Vitiligo: A Cross-sectional Study in China.白癜风的疾病认知和治疗偏好:中国的一项横断面研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2023 Oct 3;103:adv11643. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.11643.
8
Management of Stable Vitiligo-A Review of the Surgical Approach.稳定型白癜风的治疗——手术方法综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):1984. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051984.
Dermatology. 2020;236(6):571-592. doi: 10.1159/000506103. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Epidermal skin grafting in vitiligo: a pilot study.白癜风的表皮皮肤移植:一项初步研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Sep;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):47-51. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12632.
5
The CelluTome epidermal graft-harvesting system: a patient-reported outcome measure and cost evaluation study.CelluTome表皮移植采集系统:一项患者报告结局测量与成本评估研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Jun;14(3):555-560. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12644. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
6
An Automated and Minimally Invasive Tool for Generating Autologous Viable Epidermal Micrografts.一种用于生成自体活性表皮微移植片的自动化微创工具。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2016 Feb;29(2):57-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000476072.88818.aa.
7
Suction blister grafting for vitiligo: efficacy and clinical predictive factors.白癜风的吸疱移植术:疗效及临床预测因素
Dermatol Surg. 2015 May;41(5):633-9. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000341.
8
Use of a novel epidermal harvesting system in resource-poor countries.一种新型表皮采集系统在资源匮乏国家的应用。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2015 Mar;28(3):107-12. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000460839.72826.ce.
9
Surgical interventions for vitiligo: an evidence-based review.手术干预治疗白癜风:基于证据的综述。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Oct;169 Suppl 3:57-66. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12532.
10
Guidelines for the management of vitiligo: the European Dermatology Forum consensus.白癜风管理指南:欧洲皮肤病学会共识。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jan;168(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11197.x. Epub 2012 Nov 2.