Institut Pasteur, Epidemiology and Modelling of Antibiotic Evasion (EMAE), Paris, France.
Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Anti-infective evasion and pharmacoepidemiology team, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France.
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 11;13(1):236. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27845-w.
Healthcare facilities are vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 introductions and subsequent nosocomial outbreaks. Antigen rapid diagnostic testing (Ag-RDT) is widely used for population screening, but its health and economic benefits as a reactive response to local surges in outbreak risk are unclear. We simulate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a long-term care hospital with varying COVID-19 containment measures in place (social distancing, face masks, vaccination). Across scenarios, nosocomial incidence is reduced by up to 40-47% (range of means) with routine symptomatic RT-PCR testing, 59-63% with the addition of a timely round of Ag-RDT screening, and 69-75% with well-timed two-round screening. For the latter, a delay of 4-5 days between the two screening rounds is optimal for transmission prevention. Screening efficacy varies depending on test sensitivity, test type, subpopulations targeted, and community incidence. Efficiency, however, varies primarily depending on underlying outbreak risk, with health-economic benefits scaling by orders of magnitude depending on the COVID-19 containment measures in place.
医疗机构容易受到 SARS-CoV-2 的引入和随后的医院感染爆发的影响。抗原快速诊断检测(Ag-RDT)被广泛用于人群筛查,但作为对爆发风险局部激增的反应性措施,其对健康和经济效益的影响尚不清楚。我们模拟了长期护理医院中 SARS-CoV-2 的传播,同时采用了不同的 COVID-19 控制措施(社交距离、口罩、疫苗接种)。在各种情况下,通过常规的症状性 RT-PCR 检测,医院感染的发生率降低了 40-47%(平均值范围),通过及时进行一轮 Ag-RDT 筛查降低了 59-63%,通过及时进行两轮筛查降低了 69-75%。对于后者,两轮筛查之间的延迟 4-5 天是预防传播的最佳时间。筛查效果取决于测试灵敏度、测试类型、目标人群和社区发病率。然而,效率主要取决于潜在的爆发风险,根据实施的 COVID-19 控制措施,卫生经济效益呈数量级变化。