• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻合法化与事故驾车者体内四氢大麻酚的检测。

Cannabis Legalization and Detection of Tetrahydrocannabinol in Injured Drivers.

机构信息

From the University of British Columbia, Vancouver (J.R.B., H.C., S.E., J.A.S.), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS (M.A.), and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (R.E.M.) and the University of Toronto (R.E.M.), Toronto - all in Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):148-156. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2109371.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa2109371
PMID:35020985
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of cannabis legalization in Canada (in October 2018) on the prevalence of injured drivers testing positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is unclear.

METHODS

We studied drivers treated after a motor vehicle collision in four British Columbia trauma centers, with data from January 2013 through March 2020. We included moderately injured drivers (those whose condition warranted blood tests as part of clinical assessment) for whom excess blood remained after clinical testing was complete. Blood was analyzed at the provincial toxicology center. The primary outcomes were a THC level greater than 0, a THC level of at least 2 ng per milliliter (Canadian legal limit), and a THC level of at least 5 ng per milliliter. The secondary outcomes were a THC level of at least 2.5 ng per milliliter plus a blood alcohol level of at least 0.05%; a blood alcohol level greater than 0; and a blood alcohol level of at least 0.08%. We calculated the prevalence of all outcomes before and after legalization. We obtained adjusted prevalence ratios using log-binomial regression to model the association between substance prevalence and legalization after adjustment for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

During the study period, 4339 drivers (3550 before legalization and 789 after legalization) met the inclusion criteria. Before legalization, a THC level greater than 0 was detected in 9.2% of drivers, a THC level of at least 2 ng per milliliter in 3.8%, and a THC level of at least 5 ng per milliliter in 1.1%. After legalization, the values were 17.9%, 8.6%, and 3.5%, respectively. After legalization, there was an increased prevalence of drivers with a THC level greater than 0 (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 1.68), a THC level of at least 2 ng per milliliter (adjusted prevalence ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.52 to 3.45), and a THC level of at least 5 ng per milliliter (adjusted prevalence ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 4.18). The largest increases in a THC level of at least 2 ng per milliliter were among drivers 50 years of age or older (adjusted prevalence ratio, 5.18; 95% CI, 2.49 to 10.78) and among male drivers (adjusted prevalence ratio, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.60 to 3.74). There were no significant changes in the prevalence of drivers testing positive for alcohol.

CONCLUSIONS

After cannabis legalization, the prevalence of moderately injured drivers with a THC level of at least 2 ng per milliliter in participating British Columbia trauma centers more than doubled. The increase was largest among older drivers and male drivers. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.).

摘要

背景

加拿大(2018 年 10 月)大麻合法化对四氢大麻酚(THC)检测呈阳性的受伤司机的流行率的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们研究了不列颠哥伦比亚省四个创伤中心接受机动车碰撞治疗的中度受伤司机,数据来自 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月。我们纳入了在临床评估中需要进行血液检测的中度受伤司机(其病情需要进行血液检测),这些司机在完成临床检测后仍有多余的血液。血液在省级毒理学中心进行分析。主要结局是 THC 水平大于 0,THC 水平至少为 2 纳克/毫升(加拿大法定限值)和 THC 水平至少为 5 纳克/毫升。次要结局是 THC 水平至少为 2.5 纳克/毫升,血液酒精水平至少为 0.05%;血液酒精水平大于 0;血液酒精水平至少为 0.08%。我们在合法化前后计算了所有结局的流行率。我们使用对数二项式回归计算调整后流行率比,以在调整相关协变量后,对物质流行率与合法化之间的关联进行建模。

结果

在研究期间,4339 名司机(合法化前 3550 名,合法化后 789 名)符合纳入标准。在合法化之前,9.2%的司机 THC 水平大于 0,3.8%的司机 THC 水平至少为 2 纳克/毫升,1.1%的司机 THC 水平至少为 5 纳克/毫升。合法化后,这些数值分别为 17.9%、8.6%和 3.5%。合法化后,THC 水平大于 0 的司机(调整后流行率比,1.33;95%置信区间[CI],1.05 至 1.68)、THC 水平至少为 2 纳克/毫升(调整后流行率比,2.29;95%CI,1.52 至 3.45)和 THC 水平至少为 5 纳克/毫升(调整后流行率比,2.05;95%CI,1.00 至 4.18)的流行率增加。THC 水平至少为 2 纳克/毫升的司机中,年龄在 50 岁及以上的司机(调整后流行率比,5.18;95%CI,2.49 至 10.78)和男性司机(调整后流行率比,2.44;95%CI,1.60 至 3.74)的增加幅度最大。酒精检测呈阳性的司机的流行率没有显著变化。

结论

在大麻合法化后,不列颠哥伦比亚省参与创伤中心的中度受伤司机中 THC 水平至少为 2 纳克/毫升的司机的流行率增加了一倍以上。这种增长在老年司机和男性司机中最大。(由加拿大卫生研究院资助)。

相似文献

1
Cannabis Legalization and Detection of Tetrahydrocannabinol in Injured Drivers.大麻合法化与事故驾车者体内四氢大麻酚的检测。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):148-156. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2109371.
2
Cannabis use as a risk factor for causing motor vehicle crashes: a prospective study.大麻使用作为导致机动车事故的风险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1616-1626. doi: 10.1111/add.14663. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
3
High-'n'-dry? A comparison of cannabis and alcohol use in drivers presenting to hospital after a vehicular collision.高风险且干燥?机动车碰撞后到医院就诊的驾驶员中使用大麻和酒精的比较。
Addiction. 2023 Aug;118(8):1507-1516. doi: 10.1111/add.16186. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Estimating Cannabis Involvement in Fatal Crashes in Washington State Before and After the Legalization of Recreational Cannabis Consumption Using Multiple Imputation of Missing Values.使用缺失值的多重插补估计华盛顿州娱乐性大麻消费合法化前后致命车祸中大麻的参与情况。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2582-2591. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab184.
5
Motor vehicle crash fatalaties and undercompensated care associated with legalization of marijuana.机动车碰撞死亡人数与大麻合法化相关的补偿不足的医疗护理。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):566-571. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001983.
6
Police documentation of drug use in injured drivers: Implications for monitoring and preventing drug-impaired driving.警察对受伤驾驶员吸毒行为的记录:对监测和预防毒驾的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Cannabis, alcohol and other drug findings in fatally injured drivers in Ontario.安大略省致命性机动车事故驾驶员体内大麻、酒精及其他药物检测结果
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1847281. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
8
Prevalence of alcohol and drug use in injured British Columbia drivers.不列颠哥伦比亚省受伤驾驶员中酒精和药物使用的患病率。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 10;6(3):e009278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009278.
9
Crash-involved THC-positive drivers in Norway have a high frequency of polysubstance use.挪威涉及撞车事故且四氢大麻酚检测呈阳性的司机存在多种物质使用的高频率情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Mar 1;244:109800. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109800. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Alcohol and marijuana use among young injured drivers in Arizona, 2008-2014.2008 - 2014年亚利桑那州年轻受伤驾驶员的酒精和大麻使用情况
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):9-14. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1527032. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional analysis of cannabis use at work in the USA: differences by occupational risk level and state-level cannabis laws.美国工作场所大麻使用情况的横断面分析:按职业风险水平和州级大麻法律划分的差异
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 4;3(2):e001589. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001589. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of naturalistic cannabis use on lateral control and speed: A driving simulator study.自然使用大麻对横向控制和速度的影响:一项驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025 Jun 12:1-10. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2025.2508381.
3
Trends in cannabis-attributable hospitalizations and emergency department visits: data from the Canadian Substance Use Costs and Harms Study (2007-2020).
因大麻导致的住院和急诊就诊趋势:来自加拿大物质使用成本与危害研究(2007 - 2020年)的数据。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2025 Jun;45(6):265-276. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.45.6.01.
4
Cannabis and psychopathology: 2024 Snapshot of a meandering journey.大麻与精神病理学:2024年曲折历程概览
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;67(3):283-302. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_968_24. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
5
Considerations for Anesthesia in Older Adults with Cannabis Use.老年大麻使用者麻醉的注意事项。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Dec;41(12):933-943. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01161-6. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
6
Attitudes toward driving after cannabis use: a systematic review.大麻使用后对驾驶的态度:一项系统评价。
J Cannabis Res. 2024 Sep 28;6(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s42238-024-00240-0.
7
Road hazard: a systematic review of traffic injuries following recreational cannabis legalization.道路危险:休闲大麻合法化后交通伤害的系统回顾。
CJEM. 2024 Aug;26(8):554-563. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00736-x. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
8
The : implications for human participant research with cannabis.大麻对人体受试者研究的影响。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2024 Jun 18;49(3):E212-E217. doi: 10.1503/jpn.240049. Print 2024 May-Jun.
9
Road safety implications of the partial legalisation of cannabis in Germany: protocol for a quasi-experimental study.德国大麻部分合法化对道路安全的影响:一项准实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 13;14(6):e084611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084611.
10
Neuromodulation for Cannabis Use: A Scoping Review.用于大麻使用的神经调节:一项范围综述。
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 2;14(4):356. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040356.