Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Feb;23(2):189-201. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0451. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
To compare the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using dual switching monopolar (DSM), switching bipolar (SB), and combined DSM + SB modes at two different interelectrode distances (25 and 20 mm) in an study, which simulated ablation of a 2.5-cm virtual hepatic tumor.
A total of 132 ablation zones were created (22 ablation zones for each protocol) using three separable clustered electrodes. The performances of the DSM, SB, and combined DSM + SB ablation modes were compared by evaluating the following parameters of the RFA zones at two interelectrode distances: shape (circularity), size (diameter and volume), peritumoral ablative margins, and percentages of the white zone at the midpoint of the two electrodes (ablative margin at midpoint, AMm) and in the electrode path (ablative margin at electrode path, AMe).
At both distances, circularity was the highest in the SB mode, followed by the DSM + SB mode, and was the lowest in the DSM mode. The circularity of the ablation zone showed a significant difference among the three energy groups ( < 0.001 and = 0.002 for 25-mm and 20-mm, respectively). All size measurements, AMm, and AMe were the greatest in the DSM mode, followed by the DSM + SB mode, and the lowest were with the SB mode (all statistically significant). The white zone proportion in AMm and AMe were the greatest in the SB mode, followed by the DSM + SB mode and DSM in general.
DSM and SB appear to be complementary in creating an ideal ablation zone. RFA with the SB mode can efficiently eradicate tumors and create a circular ablation zone, while DSM is required to create a sufficient ablative margin and a large ablation zone.
在一项研究中比较了在两种不同电极间距(25mm 和 20mm)下,使用双切换单极(DSM)、切换双极(SB)和 DSM+SB 联合模式的射频消融(RFA)的结果,该研究模拟了 2.5cm 虚拟肝肿瘤的消融。
使用三个可分离的集束电极共创建了 132 个消融区(每种方案 22 个消融区)。通过评估两种电极间距下 RFA 区的以下参数,比较了 DSM、SB 和 DSM+SB 联合消融模式的性能:形状(圆度)、大小(直径和体积)、肿瘤周围消融边界以及电极中点处(中点消融边界,AMm)和电极路径处(电极路径处消融边界,AME)的白色区域百分比。
在两种距离下,SB 模式的圆度最高,其次是 DSM+SB 模式,而 DSM 模式的圆度最低。消融区的圆度在三组能量之间存在显著差异(25mm 和 20mm 分别为<0.001 和=0.002)。所有尺寸测量值、AMm 和 AMe 在 DSM 模式下最大,其次是 DSM+SB 模式,而在 SB 模式下最小(均具有统计学意义)。在 AMm 和 AMe 中白色区域比例在 SB 模式下最大,其次是 DSM+SB 模式,总体而言 DSM 模式最小。
DSM 和 SB 似乎在创建理想的消融区方面具有互补性。SB 模式的 RFA 可以有效地消灭肿瘤并创建圆形消融区,而 DSM 则需要创建足够的消融边界和较大的消融区。