Suppr超能文献

使用可分离集束电极的双切换单极射频消融:与离体牛肝中连续和切换单极模式的比较。

Dual switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode: comparison with consecutive and switching monopolar modes in ex vivo bovine livers.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):403-11. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.3.403. Epub 2013 May 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the in-vitro efficiency of dual-switching monopolar (DSM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a separable clustered electrode (Octopus® electrodes) with consecutive monopolar (CM) and switching monopolar (SM) RFA techniques to create an ablative zone in the explanted bovine liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For DSM-RFA, we used a prototype, three-channel, dual generator RFA Unit and Octopus® electrodes with three, 17 gauge internally cooled electrodes. The RFA Unit allowed simultaneous radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery to two electrodes of the Octopus® electrodes as well as automatic switching among the three electrode pairs according to the impedance changes. RF energy was sequentially applied to one of the three electrodes for 24 minutes (group A; CM mode, n = 10) or alternatively applied for 12 minutes (group B; SM mode, n = 10) or concurrently applied to a pair of electrodes for 12 minutes (group C; DSM mode, n = 10) in explanted bovine livers. Changes in the impedance and current during RFA as well as the dimensions of the thermal ablative zones were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The mean, delivered RF energy amounts in groups A, B, and C were 63.15 ± 8.6 kJ, 72.13 ± 5.4 kJ, and 106.08 ± 13.4 kJ, respectively (p < 0.001). The DSM mode created a significantly larger ablation volume than did the other modes, i.e., 68.1 ± 10.2 cm(3) (group A), 92.0 ± 19.9 cm(3) (group B), and 115.1 ± 14.0 cm(3) (group C) (p < 0.001). The circularity in groups A, B, and C were 0.84 ± 0.06, 0.87 ± 0.04 and 0.90 ± 0.03, respectively (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

DSM-RFA using Octopus® electrodes can help create large ablative zones within a relatively short time.

摘要

目的

比较使用可分离集束电极(Octopus®电极)的双切换单极(DSM)射频消融(RFA)与连续单极(CM)和切换单极(SM)RFA 技术在离体牛肝中创建消融区域的体外效率。

材料和方法

对于 DSM-RFA,我们使用了一个原型、三通道、双发生器 RFA 单元和带有三个 17 号内部冷却电极的 Octopus®电极。RFA 单元允许同时向 Octopus®电极的两个电极输送射频(RF)能量,并根据阻抗变化自动在三个电极对之间切换。RF 能量依次施加到三个电极中的一个电极上 24 分钟(A 组;CM 模式,n = 10),或者交替施加 12 分钟(B 组;SM 模式,n = 10),或者同时施加 12 分钟(C 组;DSM 模式,n = 10)在离体牛肝中。比较三组之间 RFA 过程中阻抗和电流的变化以及热消融区域的尺寸。

结果

A、B 和 C 组的平均输送 RF 能量分别为 63.15 ± 8.6 kJ、72.13 ± 5.4 kJ 和 106.08 ± 13.4 kJ(p < 0.001)。DSM 模式比其他模式创建的消融体积显著更大,即 68.1 ± 10.2 cm³(A 组)、92.0 ± 19.9 cm³(B 组)和 115.1 ± 14.0 cm³(C 组)(p < 0.001)。A、B 和 C 组的圆度分别为 0.84 ± 0.06、0.87 ± 0.04 和 0.90 ± 0.03(p = 0.03)。

结论

使用 Octopus®电极的 DSM-RFA 可以帮助在相对较短的时间内创建大的消融区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ec2/3655292/91185c015d4e/kjr-14-403-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验