Suppr超能文献

2020 年 3 月至 11 月,阿肯色州和肯塔基州时空细化的 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数及其与人口规模和公共卫生政策的关系。

Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March - November 2020.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;68:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the time-varying reproduction number, R, for COVID-19 in Arkansas and Kentucky and investigate the impact of policies and preventative measures on the variability in R.

METHODS

Arkansas and Kentucky county-level COVID-19 cumulative case count data (March 6-November 7, 2020) were obtained. R was estimated using the R package 'EpiEstim', by county, region (Delta, non-Delta, Appalachian, non-Appalachian), and policy measures.

RESULTS

The R was initially high, falling below 1 in May or June depending on the region, before stabilizing around 1 in the later months. The median R for Arkansas and Kentucky at the end of the study were 1.15 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1.13, 1.18) and 1.10 (95% CrI, 1.08, 1.12), respectively, and remained above 1 for the non-Appalachian region. R decreased when facial coverings were mandated, changing by -10.64% (95% CrI, -10.60%, -10.70%) in Arkansas and -5.93% (95% CrI, -4.31%, -7.65%) in Kentucky. The trends in R estimates were mostly associated with the implementation and relaxation of social distancing measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Arkansas and Kentucky maintained a median R above 1 during the entire study period. Changes in R estimates allow quantitative estimates of potential impact of policies such as facemask mandate.

摘要

目的

检测阿肯色州和肯塔基州 COVID-19 的时变繁殖数 R,并调查政策和预防措施对 R 的可变性的影响。

方法

获取阿肯色州和肯塔基州县级 COVID-19 累计病例数据(2020 年 3 月 6 日-11 月 7 日)。使用 R 包'EpiEstim'按县、地区(三角洲、非三角洲、阿巴拉契亚、非阿巴拉契亚)和政策措施来估计 R。

结果

R 最初很高,根据地区的不同,在 5 月或 6 月下降到 1 以下,然后在后期几个月稳定在 1 左右。研究结束时,阿肯色州和肯塔基州的 R 的中位数分别为 1.15(95%可信区间[CrI],1.13,1.18)和 1.10(95% CrI,1.08,1.12),非阿巴拉契亚地区仍高于 1。当强制佩戴面罩时,R 会下降,阿肯色州下降 10.64%(95% CrI,-10.60%,-10.70%),肯塔基州下降 5.93%(95% CrI,-4.31%,-7.65%)。R 估计的趋势主要与社会距离措施的实施和放松有关。

结论

在整个研究期间,阿肯色州和肯塔基州的 R 中位数保持在 1 以上。R 估计值的变化允许对口罩强制令等政策的潜在影响进行定量估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/647b/8750695/fdc53ce5e092/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验