Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Aug 4;17:e276. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.212.
We aimed to examine how public health policies influenced the dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) time-varying reproductive number ( ) in South Carolina from February 26, 2020, to January 1, 2021.
COVID-19 case series (March 6, 2020, to January 10, 2021) were shifted by 9 d to approximate the infection date. We analyzed the effects of state and county policies on using EpiEstim. We performed linear regression to evaluate if per-capita cumulative case count varies across counties with different population size.
shifted from 2-3 in March to <1 during April and May. rose over the summer and stayed between 1.4 and 0.7. The introduction of statewide mask mandates was associated with a decline in (-15.3%; 95% CrI, -13.6%, -16.8%), and school re-opening, an increase by 12.3% (95% CrI, 10.1%, 14.4%). Less densely populated counties had higher attack rates ( < 0.0001).
The dynamics over time indicated that public health interventions substantially slowed COVID-19 transmission in South Carolina, while their relaxation may have promoted further transmission. Policies encouraging people to stay home, such as closing nonessential businesses, were associated with reduction, while policies that encouraged more movement, such as re-opening schools, were associated with increase.
我们旨在研究公共卫生政策如何影响南卡罗来纳州 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 2021 年 1 月 1 日期间 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)时变繁殖数( )的动态。
将 COVID-19 病例系列(2020 年 3 月 6 日至 2021 年 1 月 10 日)推迟 9 天以近似感染日期。我们使用 EpiEstim 分析了州和县级政策对 的影响。我们进行线性回归以评估不同人口规模的县的人均累计病例数是否存在差异。
从 3 月的 2-3 下降到 4 月和 5 月的<1。 夏季上升并保持在 1.4 到 0.7 之间。全州范围的口罩强制令的推出与 下降相关(-15.3%;95%CrI,-13.6%,-16.8%),而学校重新开放则增加了 12.3%(95%CrI,10.1%,14.4%)。人口密度较低的县的发病率更高(<0.0001)。
随着时间的推移, 动态表明公共卫生干预措施极大地减缓了南卡罗来纳州的 COVID-19 传播,而其放松可能促进了进一步的传播。鼓励人们居家的政策,如关闭非必要业务,与 减少相关,而鼓励更多活动的政策,如重新开放学校,则与 增加相关。