Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Canali Elisabetta, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin-Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas José Luis, Schmidt Christian Gortázar, Herskin Mette, Michel Virginie, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Padalino Barbara, Pasquali Paolo, Spoolder Hans, Ståhl Karl, Velarde Antonio, Viltrop Arvo, Winckler Christoph, Gubbins Simon, Laroucau Karine, Antoniou Sotiria-Eleni, Aznar Inma, Broglia Alessandro, Lima Eliana, Van der Stede Yves, Zancanaro Gabriele, Roberts Helen Clare
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 12;20(1):e07069. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7069. eCollection 2022 Jan.
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for glanders. In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. Considering the epidemiology and distribution of glanders, it was foreseen that three different situations could lead to a suspicion of the disease. Sampling procedures were defined for each of the three different suspicion types, which can also be applied in most of the other scenarios assessed. The monitoring period (6 months) was assessed as effective in all scenarios. The AHAW Panel of experts considered the minimum radius and duration of the existing protection and surveillance zone, set at the establishment level, effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to glanders.
欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)收到欧盟委员会的一项任务授权,要求根据关于可传播动物疾病的(欧盟)2016/429号法规(“动物卫生法”),评估一些针对A类清单中所列疾病的控制措施的有效性。本意见属于一系列将对这些控制措施进行评估的意见之一,本意见涵盖对鼻疽控制措施的评估。在本意见中,EFSA和动物卫生与福利专家小组审查了以下方面的有效性:(i)临床和实验室采样程序,(ii)监测期,以及(iii)保护和监测区的最小半径,以及这些措施应在这些区域应用的最短时间。用于这一系列意见的一般方法已在其他地方发表。考虑到鼻疽的流行病学和分布情况,可以预见三种不同情况可能导致对该疾病产生怀疑。针对三种不同怀疑类型分别定义了采样程序,这些程序也可应用于评估的大多数其他情况。监测期(6个月)在所有情况下均被评估为有效。动物卫生与福利专家小组认为,在养殖场层面设定的现有保护和监测区的最小半径和持续时间是有效的。针对所评估的每种情况提供的建议旨在支持欧盟委员会起草进一步的立法,以及应对与鼻疽相关的合理临时请求。