Loh Jennifer M I, Saleh Abu
University of Canberra, Canberra Business School, Bruce Campus, Canberra, Australia.
Heliyon. 2021 Dec 30;8(1):e08694. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08694. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Incivility in the workplace is a growing problem in many workplaces that can detrimentally affect employees and organisations. Despite this increasing problem, the current literature on incivility lacks an integrated theoretical model to explain engaged and retaliated incivility in the workplace. To address this gap, we tested a model which incorporated both Spiral Theory of Incivility with Conservation of Resource Theory to explain the underlying processes involve in the relationship between engaged and retaliatory workplace incivility. Specifically, retaliatory incivility was hypothesised as an influencing factor, work withdrawal and job dissatisfaction as consequences, and emotional exhaustion as a moderator. A total of 875 employees in multinational organisations across three countries were panel surveyed. The overall result from the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) indicated that the fit indices for the proposed model fulfilled all recommended levels. Importantly, emotional exhaustion was found to be the trigger point in the negative spiral of workplace incivility. Theoretical implications and practical considerations were discussed.
职场不文明行为在许多工作场所中是一个日益严重的问题,会对员工和组织产生不利影响。尽管这个问题日益严重,但当前关于不文明行为的文献缺乏一个综合理论模型来解释职场中的主动不文明行为和报复性不文明行为。为了填补这一空白,我们测试了一个模型,该模型将不文明行为螺旋理论与资源守恒理论结合起来,以解释主动和报复性职场不文明行为之间关系所涉及的潜在过程。具体而言,报复性不文明行为被假设为一个影响因素,工作退缩和工作不满为结果,而情绪耗竭为一个调节变量。对来自三个国家的跨国组织中的875名员工进行了面板调查。结构方程模型(SEM)的总体结果表明,所提出模型的拟合指数满足所有推荐水平。重要的是,发现情绪耗竭是职场不文明行为负面螺旋的触发点。讨论了理论意义和实际考量。