• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 疫苗试验安慰剂组不良事件的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Frequency of Adverse Events in the Placebo Arms of COVID-19 Vaccine Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143955. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43955.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43955
PMID:35040967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8767431/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Adverse events (AEs) after placebo treatment are common in randomized clinical drug trials. Systematic evidence regarding these nocebo responses in vaccine trials is important for COVID-19 vaccination worldwide especially because concern about AEs is reported to be a reason for vaccination hesitancy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequencies of AEs reported in the placebo groups of COVID-19 vaccine trials with those reported in the vaccine groups.

DATA SOURCES

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Medline (PubMed) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched systematically using medical subheading terms and free-text keywords for trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to July 14, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines that investigated adults aged 16 years or older were selected if they assessed solicited AEs within 7 days of injection, included an inert placebo arm, and provided AE reports for both the vaccine and placebo groups separately. Full texts were reviewed for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline and using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses were based on random-effects models.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the proportions of placebo recipients reporting overall, systemic, and local (injection-site) AEs as well as logarithmic odds ratios (ORs) to evaluate group differences. Outcomes were tested for significance using z tests with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Twelve articles with AE reports for 45 380 participants (22 578 placebo recipients and 22 802 vaccine recipients) were analyzed. After the first dose, 35.2% (95% CI, 26.7%-43.7%) of placebo recipients experienced systemic AEs, with headache (19.3%; 95% CI, 13.6%-25.1%) and fatigue (16.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-23.6%) being most common. After the second dose, 31.8% (95% CI, 28.7%-35.0%) of placebo recipients reported systemic AEs. The ratio between placebo and vaccine arms showed that nocebo responses accounted for 76.0% of systemic AEs after the first COVID-19 vaccine dose and for 51.8% after the second dose. Significantly more vaccine recipients reported AEs, but the group difference for systemic AEs was small after the first dose (OR, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.54 to -0.40; P < .001; standardized mean difference, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.22) and large after the second dose (OR, -1.36; 95% CI, -1.86 to -0.86; P < .001; standardized mean difference, -0.75; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.47).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, significantly more AEs were reported in vaccine groups compared with placebo groups, but the rates of reported AEs in the placebo arms were still substantial. Public vaccination programs should consider these high rates of AEs in placebo arms.

摘要

重要性

在随机临床试验中,安慰剂治疗后的不良事件(AE)很常见。关于疫苗试验中这些负面反应的系统证据对全球 COVID-19 疫苗接种至关重要,特别是因为据报道,对 AE 的担忧是疫苗犹豫的一个原因。

目的

比较 COVID-19 疫苗试验安慰剂组报告的 AE 频率与疫苗组报告的 AE 频率。

数据来源

在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,使用医学主题词和自由文本关键词,对截至 2021 年 7 月 14 日发表的 COVID-19 疫苗试验的 Medline(PubMed)和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)数据库进行了系统搜索。选择了评估 16 岁及以上成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗的随机临床试验,如果它们在注射后 7 天内评估了征集的 AE,包括惰性安慰剂臂,并分别为疫苗和安慰剂组提供 AE 报告,则入选。两名独立审查员对全文进行了评估。

数据提取和综合

数据提取和质量评估由两名独立审查员独立进行,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具。荟萃分析基于随机效应模型。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是报告总体、全身和局部(注射部位)AE 的安慰剂接受者的比例,以及评估组间差异的对数优势比(OR)。使用 95%CI 的 z 检验测试结果的显著性。

结果

分析了 12 篇报告 AE 报告的文章,涉及 45380 名参与者(22578 名安慰剂接受者和 22802 名疫苗接受者)。在第一次给药后,35.2%(95%CI,26.7%-43.7%)的安慰剂接受者经历了全身 AE,其中头痛(19.3%;95%CI,13.6%-25.1%)和疲劳(16.7%;95%CI,9.8%-23.6%)最为常见。在第二次给药后,31.8%(95%CI,28.7%-35.0%)的安慰剂接受者报告了全身 AE。安慰剂与疫苗臂的比值表明,第一次 COVID-19 疫苗接种后,负面反应占全身 AE 的 76.0%,第二次接种后占 51.8%。报告 AE 的疫苗接受者明显更多,但第一次剂量后全身 AE 的组间差异较小(OR,-0.47;95%CI,-0.54 至-0.40;P<0.001;标准化均数差,-0.26;95%CI,-0.30 至-0.22),第二次剂量后较大(OR,-1.36;95%CI,-1.86 至-0.86;P<0.001;标准化均数差,-0.75;95%CI,-1.03 至-0.47)。

结论和相关性

在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,与安慰剂组相比,疫苗组报告的 AE 明显更多,但安慰剂组报告的 AE 发生率仍然很高。公共疫苗接种计划应考虑到安慰剂组中这些高发生率的 AE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bd/8767431/3e2acf074407/jamanetwopen-e2143955-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bd/8767431/f9afa060bd05/jamanetwopen-e2143955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bd/8767431/3e2acf074407/jamanetwopen-e2143955-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bd/8767431/f9afa060bd05/jamanetwopen-e2143955-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3bd/8767431/3e2acf074407/jamanetwopen-e2143955-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency of Adverse Events in the Placebo Arms of COVID-19 Vaccine Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.COVID-19 疫苗试验安慰剂组不良事件的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143955. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43955.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Children Aged 5 to 11 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估 5 至 11 岁儿童接种 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;177(4):384-394. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.6243.
4
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
5
Efficacy and safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine candidate in ten countries in Europe and Latin America (HERALD): a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial.在欧洲和拉丁美洲的十个国家评估 CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA 疫苗候选物的疗效和安全性(HERALD):一项随机、观察者设盲、安慰剂对照、2b/3 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;22(3):329-340. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00677-0. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
Association of New-Onset Seizures With SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.新型冠状病毒疫苗与新发癫痫的相关性:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Jun 1;81(6):611-618. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0967.
7
Association of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Infection With Bell Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型冠状病毒疫苗接种或感染与贝尔麻痹的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):493-504. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0160.
8
Incidence of Placebo Adverse Events in Randomized Clinical Trials of Targeted and Immunotherapy Cancer Drugs in the Adjuvant Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.辅助治疗中靶向和免疫治疗癌症药物的随机临床试验中安慰剂不良事件的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5617.
9
Final efficacy analysis, interim safety analysis, and immunogenicity of a single dose of recombinant novel coronavirus vaccine (adenovirus type 5 vector) in adults 18 years and older: an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.一项国际、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 III 期临床试验中,重组新型冠状病毒疫苗(腺病毒 5 型载体)在 18 岁及以上成年人中的单次剂量的最终疗效分析、中期安全性分析和免疫原性。
Lancet. 2022 Jan 15;399(10321):237-248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02753-7. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociable impacts of physical and psychological factors on side effects after COVID-19 vaccination in Japan: A within-subject repeated measures design.身体和心理因素对日本新冠疫苗接种后副作用的不同影响:一项受试者内重复测量设计。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 1;13(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03325-4.
2
Placebo effects improve sickness symptoms and drug efficacy during systemic inflammation: a randomized controlled trial in human experimental endotoxemia.安慰剂效应可改善全身炎症期间的疾病症状和药物疗效:一项人体实验性内毒素血症的随机对照试验
BMC Med. 2025 Aug 4;23(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04292-8.
3
Development of a personalized digital biomarker of vaccine-associated reactogenicity using wearable sensors and digital twin technology.

本文引用的文献

1
Fear of Adverse Effects and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Recommendations of the Treatment Expectation Expert Group.对不良反应的恐惧与新冠疫苗犹豫:治疗期望专家组的建议
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Apr 1;2(4):e210804. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0804.
2
Safety and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine.新型冠状病毒疫苗 NVX-CoV2373 的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1172-1183. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107659. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Improving Medication Tolerance: A Pilot Study in Disorders of Gut-brain Interaction Treated With Tricyclic Antidepressants.
利用可穿戴传感器和数字孪生技术开发疫苗相关反应原性的个性化数字生物标志物。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 13;5(1):115. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00840-8.
4
Optimized communication during risk disclosure to reduce nocebo headache after lumbar puncture-a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.腰椎穿刺后风险告知过程中优化沟通以减少反安慰剂性头痛——一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1521978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521978. eCollection 2025.
5
Network analysis of adverse event patterns following immunization with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: real-world data from the European pharmacovigilance database EudraVigilance.mRNA新冠疫苗接种后不良事件模式的网络分析:来自欧洲药物警戒数据库EudraVigilance的真实世界数据
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;12:1501921. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1501921. eCollection 2025.
6
Prevalence of Adverse Events Reported Following the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines in Bahia State, Brazil, from 2021 to 2022.2021年至2022年巴西巴伊亚州首剂新冠疫苗接种后报告的不良事件发生率
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Feb 7;13(2):161. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13020161.
7
Assessment of psychosocial aspects in adults in post-COVID-19 condition: the EURONET-SOMA recommendations on core outcome domains for clinical and research use.新冠后成年人群心理社会因素评估:EURONET-SOMA关于临床与研究使用的核心结局领域建议
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 11;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03927-0.
8
Post-COVID-19 Vaccination and Long COVID: Insights from Patient-Reported Data.新冠病毒病后疫苗接种与新冠长期症状:来自患者报告数据的见解
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;12(12):1427. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12121427.
9
Trait responsiveness to verbal suggestions predicts nocebo responding: A meta-analysis.对言语暗示的特质反应性可预测反安慰剂反应:一项荟萃分析。
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Feb;30(1):e12774. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12774.
10
Cardiovascular complications in vascular connective tissue disorders after COVID-19 infection and vaccination.新冠病毒感染和疫苗接种后血管性结缔组织疾病中的心血管并发症
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0315499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315499. eCollection 2024.
提高药物耐受性:三环类抗抑郁药治疗肠脑互动障碍的一项初步研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(5):452-456. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001575.
4
Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy.对新冠病毒疫苗接种的犹豫态度。
BMJ. 2021 May 20;373:n1138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1138.
5
Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant.NVX-CoV2373 新冠疫苗对 B.1.351 变异株的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1899-1909. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103055. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b1 mRNA vaccine in younger and older Chinese adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 1 study.《新型冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b1 mRNA 疫苗在中国年轻和老年成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲的 1 期研究》。
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):1062-1070. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01330-9. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine formulations in healthy adults: interim results of a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2, dose-ranging study.健康成年人中新型冠状病毒重组蛋白疫苗制剂的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、1-2 期、剂量范围研究的中期结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1257-1270. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00147-X. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.一种用于新型冠状病毒2的MF59佐剂刺突糖蛋白钳夹疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的1期试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1383-1394. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00200-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant.科维希尔德腺病毒载体新冠疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)对 B.1.351 变异株的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1885-1898. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102214. Epub 2021 Mar 16.