• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本长期护理中的质量保证与质量指标的制定

Quality Assurance in Long-Term Care and Development of Quality Indicators in Japan.

作者信息

Igarashi Ayumi, Eltaybani Sameh, Takaoka Manami, Noguchi-Watanabe Maiko, Yamamoto-Mitani Noriko

机构信息

The University of Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2020 Nov 27;6:2333721420975320. doi: 10.1177/2333721420975320. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2333721420975320
PMID:35047653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8762483/
Abstract

Dealing with an aging society is a global challenge, and more countries than ever before are now mobilizing their healthcare systems to provide high-quality long-term care (LTC) to older adults. This paper reviews the current situation pertaining to aging and the issues for measuring the LTC quality in Japan. It also introduces current efforts to develop quality indicators for measuring LTC quality. Assuring the quality of LTC and developing indicators to measure its quality is a challenge worldwide. Detailed systems for LTC quality measurement have been developed and managed, primarily in the US. In Japan, on the other hand, such systems do not exist; the public LTC system mostly depends on the evaluation of structural aspects, such as facility structure and staffing. Our research group has been developing quality indicators to measure LTC quality. In the future, we aim to evaluate care quality in various LTC settings using the proposed quality indicators, aiming to improve care quality across LTC settings in the community-based integrated care system.

摘要

应对老龄化社会是一项全球性挑战,如今比以往任何时候都有更多国家在调动其医疗保健系统,为老年人提供高质量的长期护理(LTC)。本文回顾了日本老龄化的现状以及衡量长期护理质量的相关问题。它还介绍了目前为制定衡量长期护理质量的质量指标所做的努力。确保长期护理质量并制定衡量其质量的指标是一项全球性挑战。详细的长期护理质量衡量系统主要在美国得到了开发和管理。另一方面,在日本,这样的系统并不存在;公共长期护理系统主要依赖于对结构方面的评估,如设施结构和人员配备。我们的研究小组一直在开发衡量长期护理质量的质量指标。未来,我们旨在使用提议的质量指标评估各种长期护理环境中的护理质量,目标是在基于社区的综合护理系统中提高所有长期护理环境中的护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f7/8762483/c30e17e84673/10.1177_2333721420975320-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f7/8762483/c30e17e84673/10.1177_2333721420975320-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1f7/8762483/c30e17e84673/10.1177_2333721420975320-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality Assurance in Long-Term Care and Development of Quality Indicators in Japan.日本长期护理中的质量保证与质量指标的制定
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2020 Nov 27;6:2333721420975320. doi: 10.1177/2333721420975320. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
3
Toward developing care outcome quality indicators for home care for older people: A prospective cohort study in Japan.面向老年人家庭护理的护理结局质量指标的开发:日本的一项前瞻性队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 May;23(5):383-394. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14578. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Aiming Higher: Advancing Public Social Insurance for Longterm Care to Meet the Global Aging Challenge Comment on "Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan".目标更高:推进公共社会保险长期护理以应对全球老龄化挑战 评“长期护理筹资:来自日本的经验教训”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Aug 1;9(8):356-359. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.121.
5
Toward the development of a vibrant, super-aged society: The future of medicine and society in Japan.迈向充满活力的超老龄社会:日本的医学与社会的未来。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Aug;21(8):601-613. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14201. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
The Challenge of Sustaining Long-term Care in Aging Societies: Lessons From Japan and Spain Comment on "Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan".老龄化社会中长期护理的挑战:来自日本和西班牙的经验教训 述评“长期护理筹资:来自日本的经验教训”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Dec 1;9(12):520-523. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.143.
7
Advancing Long-Term Care Science Through Using Common Data Elements: Candidate Measures for Care Outcomes of Personhood, Well-Being, and Quality of Life.通过使用通用数据元素推进长期护理科学:关于人格、幸福感和生活质量护理结果的候选测量指标
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 May 8;5:2333721419842672. doi: 10.1177/2333721419842672. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
8
Ageing in Asia: Beyond the Astana Declaration Towards Financing Long-term Care for All Comment on "Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan".亚洲老龄化:超越《阿斯塔纳宣言》,实现全民长期护理筹资 评“长期护理筹资:日本的经验教训”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Jan 1;10(1):32-35. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.15.
9
Developing a quality measurement tool and reporting format for long- term care.开发一种用于长期护理的质量测量工具和报告格式。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Apr;28(4):180-96. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28018-9.
10
Complementary and Integrative Healthcare in a Long-term Care Facility: A Pilot Project.长期护理机构中的补充与整合医疗保健:一个试点项目。
Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):18-27. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.072.

引用本文的文献

1
The Longitudinal Effects of Low Body Mass Index on Unfavorable Physical Health Outcomes Among Older Adults Receiving Homecare Nursing: A Prospective Cohort Study.低体重指数对接受家庭护理的老年人不良身体健康结局的纵向影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2025 Aug;48(4):478-486. doi: 10.1002/nur.22471. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Enhancing Quality of Life: Key Factors from Long-Term Social Care Residents' Perspectives.提升生活质量:长期社会护理居民视角下的关键因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;22(2):231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020231.
3
Assessing the reliability and feasibility of quality indicators used to evaluate long-term care for older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
The Long-Term Care Insurance System in Japan: Past, Present, and Future.日本的长期护理保险制度:过去、现在与未来。
JMA J. 2019 Mar 4;2(1):67-69. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2018-0015. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
2
Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan.长期护理融资:来自日本的经验教训。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Aug 1;8(8):462-466. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.35.
3
Advancing International Research on Long-Term Care: Using Adaptive Leadership to Build Consensus on International Measurement Priorities and Common Data Elements.
评估用于评估老年人长期护理的质量指标的可靠性和可行性。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025 Mar;25(3):442-448. doi: 10.1111/ggi.15074. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
4
Change in the Proportion of Death at Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Associated Factors in the Municipality Level: A Nationwide Study in Japan.新冠疫情期间日本市级层面在家中死亡比例的变化及其相关因素:一项全国性研究
JMA J. 2024 Apr 15;7(2):213-221. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0165. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Continuous laxative use and its relationship to defecation among residents of nursing homes: A longitudinal observational study using the interRAI.养老院居民的持续使用泻药及其与排便的关系:使用 interRAI 的纵向观察研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Jan;24(1):133-139. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14777. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
6
Evaluation of Quality Indicators in Home Health Services Delivery.居家健康服务提供中的质量指标评估。
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Sep;52(9):1952-1961. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13577.
7
Facility staffing associated with potentially avoidable hospitalizations in nursing home residents in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.日本养老院居民中潜在可避免住院相关的医疗机构人员配备:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04278-2.
8
Toward developing care outcome quality indicators for home care for older people: A prospective cohort study in Japan.面向老年人家庭护理的护理结局质量指标的开发:日本的一项前瞻性队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023 May;23(5):383-394. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14578. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
Identifying the Service Capability of Long-Term Care Facilities in China: An e-Delphi Study.中国长期护理机构服务能力识别:一项电子德尔菲研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;10:884514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884514. eCollection 2022.
推进长期护理领域的国际研究:运用适应性领导力就国际测量优先事项和通用数据元素达成共识。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 Jul 18;5:2333721419864727. doi: 10.1177/2333721419864727. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Global Long-Term Care Research: A Scientometric Review.全球长期护理研究:科学计量学述评。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 12;16(12):2077. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122077.
5
Advancing Long-Term Care Science Through Using Common Data Elements: Candidate Measures for Care Outcomes of Personhood, Well-Being, and Quality of Life.通过使用通用数据元素推进长期护理科学:关于人格、幸福感和生活质量护理结果的候选测量指标
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 May 8;5:2333721419842672. doi: 10.1177/2333721419842672. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
6
Toward Common Data Elements for International Research in Long-term Care Homes: Advancing Person-Centered Care.迈向长期护理院国际研究的通用数据元素:推进以人为主的关怀。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 May;20(5):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.123. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
7
Nurses' and Care Workers' Perception of Care Quality in Japanese Long-Term Care Wards: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.护士和护理人员对日本长期护理病房护理质量的认知:一项质性描述性研究。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2018 Nov 30;5:2333393618812189. doi: 10.1177/2333393618812189. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
8
Classification of long-term care wards and their functional characteristics: analysis of national hospital data in Japan.长期护理病房的分类及其功能特征:日本全国医院数据的分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3468-0.
9
Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review.老年人社区护理质量指标:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190298. eCollection 2018.
10
Recommendations From the International Consortium on Professional Nursing Practice in Long-Term Care Homes.长期护理院专业护理实践国际联合会的建议。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Feb;17(2):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Dec 18.