Postgraduation Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Sao Paulo 01504-001, SP, Brazil.
Postgraduation Program in Health and Environment, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (UNIMES), Santos 11045-002, SP, Brazil.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 8;22(2):469. doi: 10.3390/s22020469.
This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of aPDT for the treatment of halitosis.
Search strategies were conducted in October 2021 without language or data restrictions, on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS and BBO, as well as a manual search. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with parallel design were considered for inclusion, assessing individuals (adolescents and adults) with a clinical diagnosis of halitosis treated with photodynamic therapy (aPDT). Primary outcomes assessed were halitosis measurements, adverse events and quality of life. The risk of bias for each included study was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the certainty of the body of the evidence was assessed with the GRADe approach.
Six RCTs (total of 225 participants) were included and due to clinical diversities it was not possible to group the outcome data in meta-analyses. Based on very low-certainty evidence (GRADE) the results showed that, when compared to tongue scraper, aPDT seems to promote a little to no difference in reducing halitosis and in the microbiological analysis. No adverse events were reported. Considering aPDT combined with tongue scraper, better outcome results were observed when compared to tongue scraper alone.
Based on very low-certainty evidence, the findings of this review are uncertain about the effects of aPDT for halitosis control. Further RCTs with higher number of participants and long term assessments need to be conducted to support the use of this intervention. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (number: CRD42020215319) on 19 November 2020-retrospectively registered.
本系统评价旨在评估 aPDT 治疗口臭的有效性和安全性。
检索策略于 2021 年 10 月进行,无语言或数据限制,检索数据库包括:MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、LILACS 和 BBO,并进行了手工检索。纳入平行设计的随机临床试验(RCT),评估患有口臭的个体(青少年和成年人),采用光动力疗法(aPDT)治疗。主要结局评估包括口臭测量、不良反应和生活质量。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,并采用 GRADe 方法评估证据体的确定性。
纳入了 6 项 RCT(共 225 名参与者),由于临床多样性,无法对汇总数据分析进行分组。基于低质量证据(GRADE),结果表明,与舌刮板相比,aPDT 在减少口臭和微生物分析方面似乎几乎没有差异。未报告不良反应。考虑到 aPDT 联合舌刮板,与单独使用舌刮板相比,结果更好。
基于低质量证据,本评价结果对 aPDT 控制口臭的效果不确定。需要开展更多参与者和长期评估的 RCT,以支持该干预措施的应用。该方案于 2020 年 11 月 19 日在 PROSPERO 数据库(编号:CRD42020215319)进行了注册(回顾性注册)。