Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Nursing Department of Zengcheng Branch, China; Southern Medical University, School of Nursing, China.
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Nursing Department, China.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;64:e32-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
To validate a simplified Chinese version of the therapy-related symptom checklist for children (TRSC-C) in children with cancer.
Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest coefficients. Dimensionality and construct validity were clarified using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between the TRSC-C and the PedsQL 3.0 cancer model (PedsQL 3.0) and the Lansky Play Performance Scale (LPPS) to test concurrent validity. A Student's t-test was used to compare the scores of the simplified Chinese version of the TRSC-C subscales by gender, age groups, and functional status to test sensitivity of the TRSC-C.
A sample of 170 children with cancer was recruited (11.27 ± 2.31 years). Cronbach's alpha (0.89) and interclass correlation coefficient (0.98) were acceptable. Seven factors with eigenvalues >1 explained 56.86% of the total variances. CFA demonstrated an acceptable model (CFI = 0.93, RMSE = 0.04). Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to high correlations between the TRSC-C and both the PedsQL 3.0 (r = -0.71) and LPPS (r = -0.43). The TRSC-C scores significantly differed by age groups and functional status (effect size 0.40-0.93), indicating adequate sensitivity.
The simplified Chinese version of the TRSC-C demonstrated acceptable reliability, validity, and sensitivity to support its use in clinical practice and future studies.
验证癌症患儿治疗相关症状清单(TRSC-C)简体中文版的信度和效度。
采用内部一致性和重测信度系数评估信度。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)明确维度和结构效度。采用 Pearson 相关系数评估 TRSC-C 与 PedsQL 3.0 癌症模型(PedsQL 3.0)和 Lansky 游戏表现量表(LPPS)之间的同时效度。采用学生 t 检验比较简化中文版 TRSC-C 子量表在性别、年龄组和功能状态上的得分,以检验 TRSC-C 的敏感性。
共纳入 170 例癌症患儿(11.27±2.31 岁)。Cronbach's α 系数(0.89)和组内相关系数(0.98)为可接受水平。7 个特征值>1 的因子解释了总方差的 56.86%。CFA 表明模型具有可接受的拟合度(CFI=0.93,RMSE=0.04)。TRSC-C 与 PedsQL 3.0(r=-0.71)和 LPPS(r=-0.43)之间存在中度至高度相关性,支持同时效度。TRSC-C 评分在年龄组和功能状态上存在显著差异(效应量为 0.40-0.93),表明具有足够的敏感性。
TRSC-C 简体中文版具有可接受的信度、效度和敏感性,支持其在临床实践和未来研究中的应用。