Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Feb;130(2):27001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8930. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
During the 2010 () disaster, controlled burning was conducted to remove oil from the water. Workers near combustion sites were potentially exposed to increased fine particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter ()] levels. Exposure to has been linked to decreased lung function, but to our knowledge, no study has examined exposure encountered in an oil spill cleanup.
We investigated the association between estimated only from burning/flaring of oil/gas and lung function measured 1-3 y after the disaster.
We included workers who participated in response and cleanup activities on the water during the disaster and had lung function measured at a subsequent home visit (). concentrations were estimated using a Gaussian plume dispersion model and linked to work histories via a job-exposure matrix. We evaluated forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; milliliters), forced vital capacity (FVC; milliliters), and their ratio (FEV1/FVC; %) in relation to average and cumulative daily maximum exposures using multivariable linear regressions.
We observed significant exposure-response trends associating higher cumulative daily maximum exposure with lower FEV1 () and FEV1/FVC (). In comparison with the referent group (workers not involved in or near the burning), those with higher cumulative exposures had lower FEV1 [, 95% confidence interval (CI): , 3.7] and FEV1/FVC (, 95% CI: , 0.2). We also saw nonsignificant reductions in FVC (high vs. referent: , 95% CI: , 77.6; ). Similar associations were seen for average daily maximum exposure. Inverse associations were also observed in analyses stratified by smoking and time from exposure to spirometry and when we restricted to workers without prespill lung disease.
Among oil spill workers, exposure to specifically from controlled burning of oil/gas was associated with significantly lower FEV1 and FEV1/FVC when compared with workers not involved in burning. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8930.
在 2010 年的()灾难中,进行了受控燃烧以清除水中的石油。燃烧现场附近的工人可能会接触到更高水平的细颗粒物[空气动力学直径()]。接触到()与肺功能下降有关,但据我们所知,尚无研究检查过在溢油清理过程中遇到的暴露情况。
我们调查了仅从燃烧/燃烧油/气中估算出的()与灾难发生后 1-3 年测量的肺功能之间的关联。
我们纳入了在()灾难期间在水上参与响应和清理活动并且在随后的家访中进行了肺功能测量的工人()。使用高斯烟羽扩散模型估算()浓度,并通过工作暴露矩阵将其与工作经历相关联。我们使用多变量线性回归评估了与平均和累积每日最大暴露相关的 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1;毫升),用力肺活量(FVC;毫升)及其比值(FEV1/FVC;%)。
我们观察到与较高的累积每日最大暴露相关的显著暴露-反应趋势,与较低的 FEV1()和 FEV1/FVC()相关。与参考组(不参与或不靠近燃烧的工人)相比,那些累积暴露较高的人 FEV1 较低[,95%置信区间(CI):,]和 FEV1/FVC(,95% CI:,0.2)。我们还观察到 FVC 有轻微降低(高 vs. 参考:,95% CI:,77.6;)。在平均每日最大暴露分析中也观察到了类似的关联。在吸烟分层和暴露于肺活量计的时间分层分析以及当我们限制在没有溢油前肺病的工人中时,也观察到了相反的关联。
在溢油工人中,与未参与燃烧的工人相比,具体从受控燃烧油/气中接触到()与 FEV1 和 FEV1/FVC 明显降低有关。