• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前数据能否提高急诊科脓毒症的早期识别?基于机器学习方法的综合评价。

Can Prehospital Data Improve Early Identification of Sepsis in Emergency Department? An Integrative Review of Machine Learning Approaches.

机构信息

Marcella Niehoff School of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, United States.

Department of Health Informatics and Data Science, Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):189-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742369. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1742369
PMID:35108741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8810268/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with high mortality, especially during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Along with high monetary health care costs for sepsis treatment, there is a lasting impact on lives of sepsis survivors and their caregivers. Early identification is necessary to reduce the negative impact of sepsis and to improve patient outcomes. Prehospital data are among the earliest information collected by health care systems. Using these untapped sources of data in machine learning (ML)-based approaches can identify patients with sepsis earlier in emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVES

This integrative literature review aims to discuss the importance of utilizing prehospital data elements in ED, summarize their current use in developing ML-based prediction models, and specifically identify those data elements that can potentially contribute to early identification of sepsis in ED when used in ML-based approaches.

METHOD

Literature search strategy includes following two separate searches: (1) use of prehospital data in ML models in ED; and (2) ML models that are developed specifically to predict/detect sepsis in ED. In total, 24 articles are used in this review.

RESULTS

A summary of prehospital data used to identify time-sensitive conditions earlier in ED is provided. Literature related to use of ML models for early identification of sepsis in ED is limited and no studies were found related to ML models using prehospital data in prediction/early identification of sepsis in ED. Among those using ED data, ML models outperform traditional statistical models. In addition, the use of the free-text elements and natural language processing (NLP) methods could result in better prediction of sepsis in ED.

CONCLUSION

This study reviews the use of prehospital data in early decision-making in ED and suggests that researchers utilize such data elements for prediction/early identification of sepsis in ML-based approaches.

摘要

背景

脓毒症与高死亡率相关,尤其是在新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)大流行期间。除了脓毒症治疗的高额医疗费用外,它还对脓毒症幸存者及其护理人员的生活产生持久影响。早期识别对于减轻脓毒症的负面影响和改善患者预后至关重要。院前数据是医疗系统最早收集的信息之一。在基于机器学习(ML)的方法中使用这些未开发的数据源可以在急诊科更早地识别出脓毒症患者。

目的

本综合文献综述旨在讨论在急诊科利用院前数据元素的重要性,总结其在开发基于 ML 的预测模型中的当前用途,并特别确定当在基于 ML 的方法中使用时,哪些数据元素可有助于在急诊科中更早地识别脓毒症。

方法

文献检索策略包括以下两个单独的搜索:(1)在急诊科的 ML 模型中使用院前数据;(2)专门开发用于在急诊科预测/检测脓毒症的 ML 模型。总共使用了 24 篇文章进行了本次综述。

结果

提供了一份摘要,总结了用于在急诊科更早地识别时间敏感情况的院前数据。与在急诊科使用 ML 模型来早期识别脓毒症相关的文献有限,并且没有发现与使用院前数据在急诊科中预测/早期识别脓毒症的 ML 模型相关的研究。在使用 ED 数据的研究中,ML 模型优于传统的统计模型。此外,使用自由文本元素和自然语言处理(NLP)方法可以更好地预测 ED 中的脓毒症。

结论

本研究回顾了院前数据在 ED 早期决策中的使用,并建议研究人员在基于 ML 的方法中利用这些数据元素来进行预测/早期识别脓毒症。

相似文献

1
Can Prehospital Data Improve Early Identification of Sepsis in Emergency Department? An Integrative Review of Machine Learning Approaches.院前数据能否提高急诊科脓毒症的早期识别?基于机器学习方法的综合评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):189-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742369. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
Sepsis prediction, early detection, and identification using clinical text for machine learning: a systematic review.使用临床文本进行机器学习的脓毒症预测、早期检测和识别:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 29;29(3):559-575. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab236.
4
Machine learning algorithms for early sepsis detection in the emergency department: A retrospective study.机器学习算法在急诊科早期脓毒症检测中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104689. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Prehospital characteristics among patients with sepsis: a comparison between patients with or without adverse outcome.院前脓毒症患者的特征:有或无不良结局患者之间的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 6;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0255-0.
7
Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.基于心率变异性的机器学习模型用于急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的风险预测
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14197. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014197.
8
Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients from Early COVID-19 Pandemic that Predict SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Machine-learning Approach.早期新冠疫情期间急诊科患者的临床特征预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染:机器学习方法。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 4;22(2):244-251. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.12.49370.
9
qSOFA Has Poor Sensitivity for Prehospital Identification of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.qSOFA对院前严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的识别敏感性较差。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):489-497. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1274348. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.

引用本文的文献

1
[S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].[S3 脓毒症预防、诊断、治疗及随访指南 - 2025年更新版]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01317-1.
2
Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges.院前急救的临床研究:当前与未来的挑战
Clin Pract. 2023 Oct 23;13(5):1266-1285. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050114.
3
A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with doctor-in-the-loop.带人工干预的数据挖掘的快速机器学习开发方法。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0284965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284965. eCollection 2023.
4
SEPRES: Intensive Care Unit Clinical Data Integration System to Predict Sepsis.SEPRES:用于预测脓毒症的重症监护病房临床数据集成系统。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):65-75. doi: 10.1055/a-1990-3037. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Artificial intelligence decision points in an emergency department.急诊科中的人工智能决策点
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;9(3):165-168. doi: 10.15441/ceem.22.366. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Information Exchange between Specialists and General Practitioners Benefits Rural Patients.专科医生和全科医生之间的健康信息交换使农村患者受益。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):564-572. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731287. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Machine Learning Versus Usual Care for Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.机器学习与常规护理在急诊科诊断和预后预测中的比较:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;28(2):184-196. doi: 10.1111/acem.14190. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Identifying the relative importance of predictors of survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest: a machine learning study.在院外心脏骤停中识别生存预测因子的相对重要性:一项机器学习研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 25;28(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00742-9.
4
A Review of Predictive Analytics Solutions for Sepsis Patients.脓毒症患者预测分析解决方案综述
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):387-398. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710525. Epub 2020 May 27.
5
Serial Heart Rate Variability Measures for Risk Prediction of Septic Patients in the Emergency Department.急诊科脓毒症患者风险预测的连续心率变异性测量
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:285-294. eCollection 2019.
6
Automated Hierarchy Evaluation System of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemia Stroke.急性缺血性卒中大血管闭塞自动分级评估系统
Front Neuroinform. 2020 Mar 24;14:13. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2020.00013. eCollection 2020.
7
Development and Validation of a Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment-Based Machine-Learning Model for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department.基于快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估的机器学习模型在急诊科疑似感染患者死亡率预测中的开发与验证
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 23;9(3):875. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030875.
8
Prehospital triage of acute aortic syndrome using a machine learning algorithm.采用机器学习算法对急性主动脉综合征进行院前分诊。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jul;107(8):995-1003. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11442. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
9
Prediction of Early TBI Mortality Using a Machine Learning Approach in a LMIC Population.在低收入和中等收入国家人群中使用机器学习方法预测早期创伤性脑损伤死亡率
Front Neurol. 2020 Jan 24;10:1366. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01366. eCollection 2019.
10
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.