• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
People's experiences of distress and psychosocial care following a terrorist attack: interviews with survivors of the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017.恐怖袭击后人们的痛苦经历及心理社会护理:对2017年曼彻斯特竞技场爆炸案幸存者的访谈
BJPsych Open. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e41. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.2.
2
Survivors' experiences of informal social support in coping and recovering after the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing.2017年曼彻斯特竞技场爆炸事件幸存者在应对及恢复过程中获得非正式社会支持的经历。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jul 4;8(4):e124. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.528.
3
Trajectories of distress and recovery, secondary stressors and social cure processes in people who used the resilience hub after the Manchester Arena bombing.曼彻斯特竞技场爆炸案后使用复原力中心的人群的痛苦与恢复轨迹、继发性压力源及社会治愈过程
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 8;9(5):e143. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.527.
4
Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident.了解应对恐怖袭击事件的心理影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 24;12(1):1959116. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1959116. eCollection 2021.
5
The psychosocial response to a terrorist attack at Manchester Arena, 2017: a process evaluation.2017 年曼彻斯特竞技场恐怖袭击的心理社会反应:过程评估。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 2;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00527-4.
6
UK healthcare staff experiences and perceptions of a mass casualty terrorist incident response: a mixed-methods study.英国医护人员对大规模伤亡恐怖袭击事件应对的经验和看法:一项混合方法研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Oct;38(10):756-764. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208966. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Principles for designing and delivering psychosocial and mental healthcare.心理社会和精神保健的设计和提供原则。
BMJ Mil Health. 2020 Apr;166(2):105-110. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2017-000880. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
The psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan: a systematic review protocol.乳腺癌女性患者一生中心理社会经历的系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):112-21. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1795.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
The effectiveness of sexual assault referral centres with regard to mental health and substance use: a national mixed-methods study - the MiMoS Study.性侵犯转介中心在心理健康和物质使用方面的效果:一项全国性混合方法研究——MiMoS 研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(21):1-117. doi: 10.3310/YTRW7448.

引用本文的文献

1
The thematic series on the psychosocial and mental health impacts of terrorism and collective violence: narrative review of common themes from diverse events, places and research methods.关于恐怖主义和集体暴力对心理社会及精神健康影响的专题系列:对来自不同事件、地点和研究方法的共同主题的叙述性综述
BJPsych Open. 2025 Aug 1;11(5):e169. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10061.
2
State of the art on the main intervention methodologies in the field of emergency psychology: a systematic review.应急心理学领域主要干预方法的现状:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1597897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1597897. eCollection 2025.
3
"It's that feeling that you can't get away": Motherhood, gender inequality and the stress process during extreme events.“就是那种无法摆脱的感觉”:母亲身份、性别不平等与极端事件中的压力过程
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12856. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12856.
4
Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack.克赖斯特彻奇恐怖袭击后一个穆斯林社区心理健康结果的相关因素。
BJPsych Open. 2024 Nov 13;10(6):e209. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.774.
5
'I can feel sad about it and I can worry, but inside I know everything happens for a reason': personal experiences in the aftermath of the March 15 Christchurch mosque attacks.“我会为此感到悲伤,也会担忧,但内心深处我明白一切事出有因”:克赖斯特彻奇清真寺3·15袭击事件后的个人经历
BJPsych Open. 2024 Oct 11;10(6):e176. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.791.
6
The psychosocial impacts of the 15 March terrorist attack on the Christchurch Muslim community: A descriptive, cross-sectional assessment.3 月 15 日基督城恐怖袭击对穆斯林社区的心理社会影响:描述性、横断面评估。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;58(11):977-989. doi: 10.1177/00048674241276802. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
7
Somatic symptoms and insomnia among bereaved parents and siblings eight years after the Utøya terror attack.创伤后 8 年,乌托亚恐怖袭击事件中遇难者父母和兄弟姐妹的躯体症状和失眠。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2300585. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2300585. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
8
Research following trauma in minority ethnic and faith communities: lessons from a study of the psychosocial sequelae of the Christchurch mosque terror attacks.少数族裔和宗教社区创伤后的研究:克赖斯特彻奇清真寺恐怖袭击心理社会后遗症研究的经验教训
BJPsych Open. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):e27. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.641.
9
Practical psychosocial care for providers of pre-hospital care: a summary of the report 'valuing staff, valuing patients'.实用心理社会关怀服务于院前急救提供者:报告《重视员工,关爱患者》概述
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 10;31(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01141-6.
10
Trajectories of distress and recovery, secondary stressors and social cure processes in people who used the resilience hub after the Manchester Arena bombing.曼彻斯特竞技场爆炸案后使用复原力中心的人群的痛苦与恢复轨迹、继发性压力源及社会治愈过程
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 8;9(5):e143. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.527.

本文引用的文献

1
Let us do better: learning lessons for recovery of healthcare professionals during and after COVID-19.让我们做得更好:汲取经验教训助力新冠疫情期间及之后医护人员的恢复
BJPsych Open. 2021 Aug 19;7(5):e151. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.981. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
COVID-19 pandemic-related anxiety, distress and burnout: prevalence and associated factors in healthcare workers of North-West Italy.与2019冠状病毒病疫情相关的焦虑、痛苦和职业倦怠:意大利西北部医护人员中的患病率及相关因素
BJPsych Open. 2021 Jan 7;7(1):e27. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.161.
3
Use of mental health supports by civilians exposed to the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris.平民在 2015 年 11 月巴黎恐怖袭击事件后的心理健康支持使用情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05785-3.
4
An Open Label Pilot Study of a Brief Psychosocial Intervention for Disaster and Trauma Survivors.一项针对灾难和创伤幸存者的简短心理社会干预的开放标签试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 26;11:483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00483. eCollection 2020.
5
Early Pain and Other Somatic Symptoms Predict Posttraumatic Stress Reactions in Survivors of Terrorist Attacks: The Longitudinal Utøya Cohort Study.早期疼痛及其他躯体症状可预测恐怖袭击幸存者的创伤后应激反应:乌托亚纵向队列研究
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Dec;33(6):1060-1070. doi: 10.1002/jts.22562. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
A decennial review of psychotraumatology: what did we learn and where are we going?心理创伤学十年回顾:我们学到了什么,又将走向何方?
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 20;10(1):1672948. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1672948. eCollection 2019.
7
Responding to the mental health consequences of the 2015-2016 terrorist attacks in Tunisia, Paris and Brussels: implementation and treatment experiences in the United Kingdom.应对 2015-2016 年突尼斯、巴黎和布鲁塞尔恐怖袭击事件对心理健康造成的影响:英国的实施和治疗经验。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020 Jul;25(3):172-180. doi: 10.1177/1355819619878756. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Psychological screening of adults and young people following the Manchester Arena incident.曼彻斯特竞技场事件后对成年人及年轻人的心理筛查。
BJPsych Open. 2019 Sep 19;5(5):e85. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.61.
9
Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards.自然灾害后社会支持、人际和社区动态。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Apr;32:105-109. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.026. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
Association Between Shame and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.羞耻感与创伤后应激障碍的关系:一项荟萃分析。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Aug;32(4):484-495. doi: 10.1002/jts.22411. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

恐怖袭击后人们的痛苦经历及心理社会护理:对2017年曼彻斯特竞技场爆炸案幸存者的访谈

People's experiences of distress and psychosocial care following a terrorist attack: interviews with survivors of the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017.

作者信息

Stancombe John, Williams Richard, Drury John, Collins Hannah, Lagan Lizzie, Barrett Alan, French Paul, Chitsabesan Prathiba

机构信息

Young People's Mental Health Research Unit, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Welsh Institute for Health and Social Care, University of South Wales, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e41. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.2.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2022.2
PMID:35109959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8867861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distress after major incidents is widespread among survivors. The great majority do not meet the criteria for mental health disorders and rely on psychosocial care provided by their informal networks and official response services. There is a need to better understand their experiences of distress and psychosocial care needs.

AIMS

The aims of our study were to enhance understanding of the experience of distress among people present at the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017, identify their experiences of psychosocial care after the incident and learn how to better deliver and target effective psychosocial care following major incidents.

METHOD

We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 18 physically non-injured survivors of the Manchester Arena attack, who registered with the NHS Manchester Resilience Hub.

RESULTS

Distress was ubiquitous, with long-lasting health and social consequences. Initial reluctance to seek help from services was also common. Early and open access to authoritative sources of information and emotional support, and organised events for survivors, were viewed as helpful interventions. Inappropriate forms of psychosocial and mental healthcare were common and potent stressors that affected coping and recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper extends our understanding of how people react to major events. Provision for the large group of people who are distressed and require psychosocial care may be inadequate after many incidents. There is a substantial agenda for developing awareness of people's needs for psychosocial interventions, and training practitioners to deliver them. The findings have substantial implications for policy and service design.

摘要

背景

重大事件后的痛苦在幸存者中普遍存在。绝大多数人不符合心理健康障碍的标准,他们依赖非正式网络和官方应对服务提供的心理社会支持。有必要更好地了解他们的痛苦经历和心理社会护理需求。

目的

我们研究的目的是增进对2017年曼彻斯特竞技场爆炸事件现场人员痛苦经历的理解,确定他们在事件发生后的心理社会护理经历,并了解如何在重大事件后更好地提供和针对有效的心理社会护理。

方法

我们对18名身体未受伤的曼彻斯特竞技场袭击事件幸存者进行了半结构化访谈,并进行了主题分析,这些幸存者在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)曼彻斯特复原力中心登记。

结果

痛苦无处不在,会产生长期的健康和社会后果。最初不愿向服务机构求助的情况也很常见。尽早、开放地获取权威信息来源和情感支持,以及为幸存者组织活动,被视为有益的干预措施。不适当的心理社会和精神卫生保健形式很常见,是影响应对和康复的强大压力源。

结论

本文扩展了我们对人们如何应对重大事件的理解。在许多事件之后,为大量痛苦且需要心理社会护理的人群提供的支持可能不足。在提高对人们心理社会干预需求的认识以及培训从业人员提供此类干预方面,还有大量工作要做。这些发现对政策和服务设计具有重大影响。