• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网上脑膜瘤教育资源的质量分析。

Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.

作者信息

Lim Chloe Ah-Ryung, Ingledew Paris-Ann

机构信息

MD Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Nov 30;8(2):129-136. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa082. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1093/nop/npaa082
PMID:35112670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8049425/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors and patients face difficulty evaluating resources available online. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the educational resources available for patients seeking meningioma information on the Internet.

METHODS

A total of 127 meningioma websites were identified by inputting the term "meningioma" on Google and two meta-search engines. A structured rating tool developed by our research group was applied to top 100 websites to evaluate with respect to accountability, interactivity, readability, and content quality. Responses to general and personal patient questions were evaluated for promptness, accuracy, and completeness. The frequency of various social media account types was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 100 websites, only 38% disclosed authorship, and 32% cited sources. Sixty-two percent did not state date of creation or modification, and 32% provided last update less than 2 years ago. Websites most often discussed the definition (99%), symptoms (97%), and treatment (96%). Prevention (8%) and prognosis (47%) were most often not covered. Only 3% of websites demonstrated recommended reading level for general population. Of 84 websites contacted, 42 responded, 32 within 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

Meningioma information is readily available online, but quality varies. Sites often lack markers for accountability, and content may be difficult to comprehend. Information on specific topics are often not available for patients. Physicians can direct meningioma patients to appropriate reliable online resources depicted in this study. Furthermore, future web developers can address the current gaps to design reliable online resources.

摘要

背景

脑膜瘤是最常见的原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤,患者在评估网上可得资源时面临困难。本研究的目的是系统评估互联网上可供寻求脑膜瘤信息的患者使用的教育资源。

方法

通过在谷歌和两个元搜索引擎上输入“脑膜瘤”一词,共识别出127个脑膜瘤网站。我们研究小组开发的一种结构化评级工具应用于排名前100的网站,以评估其问责性、交互性、可读性和内容质量。评估对一般患者问题和个人患者问题的回复的及时性、准确性和完整性。分析各种社交媒体账户类型的频率。

结果

在100个网站中,只有38%披露了作者身份,32%引用了来源。62%未注明创建或修改日期,32%的网站最后一次更新时间在2年以内。网站最常讨论的内容是定义(99%)、症状(97%)和治疗(96%)。预防(8%)和预后(47%)最常未被涵盖。只有3%的网站标明了普通人群的推荐阅读水平。在联系的84个网站中,42个做出了回应,其中32个在1天内回复。

结论

脑膜瘤信息在网上很容易获取,但质量参差不齐。网站往往缺乏问责标志,内容可能难以理解。患者通常无法获取特定主题的信息。医生可以将脑膜瘤患者引导至本研究中描述的合适可靠的在线资源。此外,未来的网站开发者可以弥补当前的差距,设计出可靠的在线资源。

相似文献

1
Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.互联网上脑膜瘤教育资源的质量分析。
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Nov 30;8(2):129-136. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa082. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.评估面向癌症患者的 COVID-19 互联网资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02182-8. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES.甲状腺癌网站质量分析。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Oct;25(10):1003-1011. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0595. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)相关网络资源质量评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1598-1605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01996-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
Depression in cancer: quality assessment of online patient education resources.癌症相关抑郁:在线患者教育资源质量评估。
Psychooncology. 2021 Mar;30(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/pon.5591. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
A fountain of knowledge? The quality of online resources for testicular cancer patients.知识源泉?睾丸癌患者在线资源的质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Aug;14(8):E363-E368. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6154.
7
Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.静脉曲张患者互联网资源质量的批判性分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):1017-1024.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.乳腺癌资源的过去与现在:八年后对在线资源质量的重新评估
Cureus. 2022 Aug 17;14(8):e28120. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28120. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Quality of Online Information Regarding Cervical Cancer.关于宫颈癌的在线信息质量
Cureus. 2020 Aug 1;12(8):e9511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9511.
10
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A fountain of knowledge? The quality of online resources for testicular cancer patients.知识源泉?睾丸癌患者在线资源的质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Aug;14(8):E363-E368. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6154.
2
Digital divide and Internet health information seeking among cancer survivors: A trend analysis from 2011 to 2017.数字鸿沟与癌症幸存者的互联网健康信息寻求:2011 年至 2017 年的趋势分析。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):61-67. doi: 10.1002/pon.5247. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
3
Websites, Websites Everywhere: How Thyroid Cancer Patients Use the Internet.网站,无处不在的网站:甲状腺癌患者如何使用互联网。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1177-1183. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01576-5.
4
The Effectiveness of Interactivity in Improving Mediating Variables, Behaviors and Outcomes of Web-Based Health Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review.互动在改善基于网络的健康干预措施中介变量、行为和结果方面的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Health Commun. 2020 Oct;35(11):1334-1348. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1631992. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES.甲状腺癌网站质量分析。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Oct;25(10):1003-1011. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0595. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
6
Early Postoperative Complications in Meningioma: Predictive Factors and Impact on Outcome.脑膜瘤术后早期并发症:预测因素及其对预后的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e851-e858. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 10.
7
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011-2015.CBTRUS统计报告:2011 - 2015年美国原发性脑肿瘤及其他中枢神经系统肿瘤诊断情况
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;20(suppl_4):iv1-iv86. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy131.
8
Nonmalignant and malignant meningioma incidence and survival in the elderly, 2005-2015, using the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States.2005-2015 年美国中央脑肿瘤登记处的老年人中非恶性和恶性脑膜瘤发病率和生存率。
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Feb 19;21(3):380-391. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy162.
9
Malignant websites? Analyzing the quality of prostate cancer education web resources.恶性网站?分析前列腺癌教育网络资源的质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Oct;12(10):344-350. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5084. Epub 2018 May 28.
10
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.