Suppr超能文献

词语的情感效价会对视觉和听觉词汇识别产生差异影响。

Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Sep;151(9):2144-2159. doi: 10.1037/xge0001176. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

Abstract

Recognizing written or spoken words involves a sequence of processing stages, transforming sensory features into lexical-semantic representations. Whereas the later processing stages are common across modalities, the initial stages are modality-specific. In the visual modality, previous studies have shown that words with positive valence are recognized faster than neutral words. Here, we examined whether the effects of valence on word recognition are specific to the visual modality or are common across visual and auditory modalities. To address this question, we analyzed multiple large databases of visual and auditory lexical decision tasks, relating the valence of words to lexical decision times while controlling for a large number of variables, including arousal and frequency. We found that valence differentially influenced visual and auditory word recognition. Valence had an asymmetric effect on visual lexical decision times, primarily speeding up recognition of positive words. By contrast, valence had a symmetric effect on auditory lexical decision times, with both negative and positive words speeding up word recognition relative to neutral words. The modality-specificity of valence effects were consistent across databases and were observed when the same sets of words were compared across modalities. We interpret these findings as indicating that valence influences word recognition partly at the sensory-perceptual stage. We relate these effects to the effects of positive (reward) and negative (punishment) reinforcers on perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

识别书面或口头单词涉及一系列处理阶段,将感觉特征转化为词汇语义表示。虽然后期处理阶段在各种模态中是通用的,但初始阶段是模态特定的。在视觉模态中,先前的研究表明,具有积极情感的单词比中性单词识别得更快。在这里,我们研究了情感对单词识别的影响是否特定于视觉模态,或者是否在视觉和听觉模态中都普遍存在。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了多个大型视觉和听觉词汇判断任务数据库,将单词的情感与词汇判断时间联系起来,同时控制了大量变量,包括唤醒度和频率。我们发现,情感对视觉和听觉单词识别有不同的影响。情感对视觉词汇判断时间有不对称的影响,主要是加速了对积极单词的识别。相比之下,情感对听觉词汇判断时间有对称的影响,与中性单词相比,负面和正面的单词都能加速单词识别。情感效应的模态特异性在不同的数据库中是一致的,并且当在不同的模态中比较相同的单词集时也可以观察到。我们将这些发现解释为表明情感在一定程度上影响了单词识别的感觉知觉阶段。我们将这些影响与积极(奖励)和消极(惩罚)强化物对感知的影响联系起来。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

4
The graded effect of valence on word recognition in Spanish.西班牙语中效价对单词识别的分级效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):851-868. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000616. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition.情感与语言:效价和唤醒水平影响单词识别。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1065-1081. doi: 10.1037/a0035669. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Crossmodal negativity bias in semantic processing.跨模态负性偏向在语义处理中的作用。
Emotion. 2022 Sep;22(6):1270-1280. doi: 10.1037/emo0000918. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
Neurobiology of value-driven attention.价值驱动注意的神经生物学。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
The Massive Auditory Lexical Decision (MALD) database.海量听觉词汇决策 (MALD) 数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1187-1204. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1056-1.
8
Valence, Not Utility, Underlies Reward-Driven Prioritization in Human Vision.效价而非效用是人类视觉中奖励驱动优先级的基础。
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 25;37(43):10438-10450. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1128-17.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验