• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performance of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG serological assay in South African 2 patients.雅培 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 血清学检测在南非 2 例患者中的表现。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0262442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262442. eCollection 2022.
2
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Health Care Workers: A Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Three Commercially Available Antibody Assays.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在医护人员中的应用:三种市售抗体检测试剂盒的临床性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039121. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00391-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of the Abbott Alinity IgG, Abbott Architect IgM, and Roche Elecsys Total SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays.雅培 Alinity IgG、雅培 Architect IgM 和罗氏 Elecsys 总 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂的临床性能比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02104-20.
4
Evaluation of Three Quantitative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays.三种定量抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体免疫分析方法的评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0137621. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01376-21.
5
Evaluation of a Surrogate Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay-Based Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cPass Neutralization Antibody Detection Assay and Correlation With Immunoglobulin G Commercial Serology Assays.基于替代酶联免疫吸附试验的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)cPass 中和抗体检测分析的评估及其与免疫球蛋白 G 商业血清学分析的相关性。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Oct 1;145(10):1212-1220. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0213-SA.
6
Performance evaluation of Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay in comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and virus microneutralization test.Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG 免疫分析与间接免疫荧光法和病毒微量中和试验的比较性能评估。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104539. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104539. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories.16家临床实验室中16种血清学新冠病毒免疫分析方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02596-20.
8
Clinical evaluation of serological IgG antibody response on the Abbott Architect for established SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于确定 SARS-CoV-2 感染的 Abbott Architect 血清 IgG 抗体反应的临床评估。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1256.e9-1256.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of 10 serological assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.评价 10 种血清学检测方法用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的诊断准确性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 May;40(5):955-961. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04092-3. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
10
Diagnosis value of SARS-CoV-2 antigen/antibody combined testing using rapid diagnostic tests at hospital admission.入院时使用快速诊断检测进行 SARS-CoV-2 抗原/抗体联合检测的诊断价值。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):3069-3076. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26855. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
SCORE: Serologic evidence of COVID-19 and social and occupational contacts in healthcare workers in long-term care and acute care facilities in Southeastern Ontario (SCORE).SCORE:安大略省东南部长期护理和急症护理机构医护人员中COVID-19的血清学证据以及社交和职业接触情况(SCORE)。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 13;20(8):e0303813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303813. eCollection 2025.
2
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels in a Cohort of Health Care Workers Before and After the Omicron Wave in Canada.加拿大奥密克戎毒株浪潮前后一组医护人员体内的抗新冠病毒 2 抗体水平
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2025 May 29;10(2):127-145. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2024-0029. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
A multicentre study comparing post-mortem SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in Cape Town mortuaries.一项比较开普敦各太平间尸检中SARS-CoV-2抗体检测情况的多中心研究。
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 31;40(1):683. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v40i1.683. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests shows significant variability in performance across different years of infection and between the tests.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学检测的比较评估显示,在不同感染年份以及不同检测之间,检测性能存在显著差异。
J Clin Virol Plus. 2023 Nov;3(4):100168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2023.100168.
5
The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the South African Population: A Scoping Review.南非人群中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)诊断检测的性能:一项范围综述
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 1;8(12):514. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8120514.
6
The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance.在暴露人群中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体受所用免疫测定法的影响:对血清学监测的启示
Pathogens. 2023 Nov 16;12(11):1360. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12111360.
7
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G in HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省HIV阳性和HIV阴性个体中SARS-CoV-2免疫球蛋白G的血清阳性率。
Afr J Lab Med. 2023 Jun 29;12(1):2065. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2065. eCollection 2023.
8
The changing profile of SARS-CoV-2 serology in Irish blood donors.爱尔兰献血者中新冠病毒血清学特征的变化
Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Dec;5:100108. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100108. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
9
Ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, intensive care admission, and death: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of over 200 million study participants.新冠病毒感染、住院、重症监护病房收治及死亡方面的种族不平等:对超2亿研究参与者的全球系统性综述与荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Mar;57:101877. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101877. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Anti-Spike Antibody Response to Natural Infection with SARS-CoV-2 and Its Activity against Emerging Variants.针对 SARS-CoV-2 自然感染的 Spike 抗体反应及其对新兴变异株的活性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0074322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00743-22. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants by Abbott molecular, antigen, and serological tests. Abbott 分子、抗原和血清学检测法检测 SARS-CoV-2 变异株。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Feb;147:105080. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105080. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
2
SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Expressed in Plants Detect Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients.植物中表达的SARS-CoV-2抗原可检测COVID-19患者的抗体反应。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 31;12:589940. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.589940. eCollection 2021.
3
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and the coronavirus pandemic: Current knowledge and implications for public health.儿童多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C)与冠状病毒大流行:现有知识及其对公共卫生的影响。
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Apr;14(4):484-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
4
Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories.16家临床实验室中16种血清学新冠病毒免疫分析方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02596-20.
5
Long-COVID: An evolving problem with an extensive impact.长新冠:一个影响广泛且不断演变的问题。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 23;111(1):10-12. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v111i11.15433.
6
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Roche Elecsys and Abbott Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Serology Assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).罗氏 Elecsys 与 Abbott 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学检测试剂盒用于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的比较临床评估。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Jan 1;145(1):32-38. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0499-SA.
7
Immunoinformatic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein and Identification of COVID-19 Vaccine Targets.基于 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳蛋白的免疫信息学分析与 COVID-19 疫苗靶点的鉴定
Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 28;11:587615. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587615. eCollection 2020.
8
Serum-IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2 after mild and severe COVID-19 infection and analysis of IgG non-responders.血清 IgG 对轻度和重度 COVID-19 感染后 SARS-CoV-2 的反应以及 IgG 无应答者的分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0241104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241104. eCollection 2020.
9
Commercial Serology Assays Predict Neutralization Activity against SARS-CoV-2.商业血清学检测可预测针对 SARS-CoV-2 的中和活性。
Clin Chem. 2021 Jan 30;67(2):404-414. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa262.
10
Evaluation of Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG and Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA assays in a clinical lab.在临床实验室评估 Abbott 抗 SARS-CoV-2 CMIA IgG 和 Euroimmun ELISA IgG/IgA 检测试剂盒。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Nov;510:687-690. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

雅培 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 血清学检测在南非 2 例患者中的表现。

Performance of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG serological assay in South African 2 patients.

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0262442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262442. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0262442
PMID:35120133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8815965/
Abstract

In late December 2019, pneumonia cases of unknown origin were reported in Wuhan, China. This virus was named SARS-CoV2 and the clinical syndrome was named coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). South Africa, despite strict and early lockdown has the highest infection rate in Africa. A key component of South Africa's response to SARSCoV2 was the rapid scale-up of diagnostic testing. The Abbott SARS-CoV2 assay detects IgG antibodies against the Nucleocapsid (N) protein of the SARS-CoV2 virus. This study undertook to validate and evaluate performance criteria of the Abbott assay and to establish whether this assay would show clinical utility in our population. Positive patients (n = 391) and negative controls (n = 139) were included. The Architect-i and Alinity-i systems were analyzers that were used to perform the SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay. In-house ELISA was incorporated into the study as a confirmatory serology test. A total of number of 530 participants was tested, 87% were symptomatic with infection and 13% were asymptomatic. When compared to RT-qPCR, the sensitivity of Architect and Alinity SARS-CoV2 assays was 69.5% and 64.8%, respectively. Specificity for Architect and Alinity assays was 95% and 90.3%, respectively. The Abbott assay was also compared to in house ELISA assay, with sensitivity for the Architect and Alinity assays of 94.7% and 92.5%, respectively. Specificity for Abbott Alinity assays was 91.7% higher than Abbott Architect 88.1%. Based on the current findings testing of IgG after 14 days is recommended in South Africa and supports other studies performed around the world.

摘要

2019 年 12 月下旬,中国武汉报告了不明原因的肺炎病例。这种病毒被命名为 SARS-CoV2,临床综合征被命名为冠状病毒病 19(COVID-19)。南非尽管实施了严格且早期的封锁措施,但仍是非洲感染率最高的国家。南非应对 SARSCoV2 的一个关键组成部分是快速扩大诊断检测。Abbott SARS-CoV2 检测法检测针对 SARS-CoV2 病毒核衣壳(N)蛋白的 IgG 抗体。本研究旨在验证和评估 Abbott 检测法的性能标准,并确定该检测法在我们人群中的临床应用价值。纳入了阳性患者(n=391)和阴性对照(n=139)。Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG 检测法使用 Architect-i 和 Alinity-i 系统进行分析。本研究纳入了内部 ELISA 作为确证性血清学检测。共检测了 530 名参与者,87%有症状感染,13%无症状感染。与 RT-qPCR 相比,Architect 和 Alinity SARS-CoV2 检测法的敏感性分别为 69.5%和 64.8%。Architect 和 Alinity 检测法的特异性分别为 95%和 90.3%。Abbott 检测法还与内部 ELISA 检测法进行了比较,Architect 和 Alinity 检测法的敏感性分别为 94.7%和 92.5%。Abbott Alinity 检测法的特异性比 Abbott Architect 检测法高 91.7%。根据目前的研究结果,建议在南非进行 14 天后的 IgG 检测,这也支持了世界各地进行的其他研究。