• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Navigating Diabetes Online Communities in Clinical Practice.在临床实践中驾驭糖尿病在线社区。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):874-886. doi: 10.1177/19322968211069409. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2
State of the Science: A Scoping Review and Gap Analysis of Diabetes Online Communities.科学现状:糖尿病在线社区的范围综述与差距分析
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):466-492. doi: 10.1177/1932296819831042. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
3
Social Media in the Diabetes Community: a Novel Way to Assess Psychosocial Needs in People with Diabetes and Their Caregivers.社交媒体在糖尿病社区中的应用:一种评估糖尿病患者及其照护者心理社会需求的新方法。
Curr Diab Rep. 2020 Feb 20;20(3):10. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-1294-3.
4
The emerging diabetes online community.新兴的糖尿病在线社区。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015;11(4):261-72. doi: 10.2174/1573399811666150421123448.
5
Effect of Diabetes Online Community Engagement on Health Indicators: Cross-Sectional Study.糖尿病在线社区参与对健康指标的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Apr 24;3(2):e8. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8603.
6
The diabetes online community: Older adults supporting self-care through peer health.糖尿病在线社区:老年人通过同行健康支持自我护理。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):518-523. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China.糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者在在线糖尿病社交平台上的人际互动强度与健康自我效能之间的相互关系:中国的深入调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 26;17(15):5375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155375.
8
Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community's Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults.糖尿病在线社区的可信度、社会资本以及帮助与危害认知:婴儿潮一代与年轻成年人的横断面比较
JMIR Aging. 2019 Sep 26;2(2):e10857. doi: 10.2196/10857.
9
Development of the Intercultural Diabetes Online Community Research Council: Codesign and Social Media Processes.跨文化糖尿病在线社区研究委员会的发展:协同设计与社交媒体流程
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Mar;13(2):176-186. doi: 10.1177/1932296818818455. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
The Sugar-Coated Truth: The Quality of Diabetes Health Information on TikTok.糖衣下的真相:TikTok上糖尿病健康信息的质量
Clin Diabetes. 2024 Sep 25;43(1):53-58. doi: 10.2337/cd24-0042. eCollection 2025 Winter.
2
Use of Online Communities among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.2型糖尿病患者对在线社区的使用:一项范围综述
Curr Diab Rep. 2024 May;24(5):96-107. doi: 10.1007/s11892-024-01538-2. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of Self-Reported Data from UK Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System (DIYAPS) Users to Determine Whether Demographic of Population Affects Use or Outcomes.对英国自助式人工胰腺系统(DIYAPS)用户自我报告数据的回顾,以确定人群的人口统计学特征是否会影响使用情况或结果。
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jul;12(7):1839-1848. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01071-5. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
A real-world study of user characteristics, safety and efficacy of open-source closed-loop systems and Medtronic 670G.开源闭环系统和美敦力 670G 的用户特征、安全性和有效性的真实世界研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Aug;23(8):1989-1994. doi: 10.1111/dom.14439. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: .5. 促进行为改变和幸福感以改善健康结果:。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S53-S72. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S005.
5
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.
6
Use of a do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system is associated with better glucose management and higher quality of life among adults with type 1 diabetes.对于1型糖尿病成年人而言,使用自制人工胰腺系统与更好的血糖管理及更高的生活质量相关。
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Aug 25;11:2042018820950146. doi: 10.1177/2042018820950146. eCollection 2020.
7
Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China.糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者在在线糖尿病社交平台上的人际互动强度与健康自我效能之间的相互关系:中国的深入调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 26;17(15):5375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155375.
8
Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患者夫妇的日常疾病评估与协作。
Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;39(8):689-699. doi: 10.1037/hea0000871. Epub 2020 May 7.
9
Participation of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Online Support Groups is Correlated to Lower Levels of Diabetes Self-Management.2 型糖尿病患者参与在线支持小组与较低的糖尿病自我管理水平相关。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):121-126. doi: 10.1177/1932296820909830. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
10
The Role and Value of Ongoing and Peer Support in Diabetes Care and Education.持续的和同伴支持在糖尿病护理和教育中的作用和价值。
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Dec;45(6):569-579. doi: 10.1177/0145721719882007. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

在临床实践中驾驭糖尿病在线社区。

Navigating Diabetes Online Communities in Clinical Practice.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul;16(4):874-886. doi: 10.1177/19322968211069409. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1177/19322968211069409
PMID:35125019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9264440/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This purpose of this study was to conduct a rapid review and environmental scan of diabetes online communities (DOCs) to highlight the clinical impact of DOC engagement and provide guidance to health care providers for navigating and prescribing DOCs.

METHODS

This two-phase review included a rapid review of clinical outcomes and an assessment of DOC content. We conducted a literature search for studies evaluating DOC use and glucometric (glycated hemoglobin [A1C], time-in-range, hypoglycemia), behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. The environmental scan of current DOC sites established key features, including available platforms, target population, content areas, and reach.

RESULTS

Twelve papers were included-eight reported DOC use within a context of do-it-yourself (DIY) noncommercial, opensource hybrid closed loop systems community and four were non-DYI related. In latter, all studies were cross-sectional, describing patient-reported outcomes. Two studies reported A1C lowering with DOC use, two DOC use was associated with high self-efficacy, one showed association with higher self-care levels, and one showed higher quality of life scores when compared with population norms. All DIY studies showed improvement in glucometrics after initiation of sensor augmented pump technology with DOC support. Of 54 DOC sites reviewed in the environmental scan, 29 were included. Diabetes online community sites were heterogenous in social media platform and type of diabetes targeted.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes online communities have the potential to improve clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Randomized control trials and/or longitudinal prospective studies evaluating outcomes are needed to further examine the potential benefits of DOC use. Diabetes online communities are diverse and span a variety of social media platforms, providing clinicians opportunities to individualize recommendations for DOC use.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对糖尿病在线社区(DOC)进行快速回顾和环境扫描,重点介绍参与 DOC 的临床影响,并为医疗保健提供者提供指导,以帮助他们了解和开具 DOC 处方。

方法

本研究分为两个阶段,包括对临床结果的快速回顾和对 DOC 内容的评估。我们对评估 DOC 使用情况以及血糖(糖化血红蛋白 [A1C]、时间在范围内、低血糖)、行为和心理社会结果的研究进行了文献检索。对当前 DOC 网站的环境扫描确定了关键特征,包括可用平台、目标人群、内容领域和覆盖范围。

结果

共纳入 12 篇论文——8 篇报告了在 DIY(非商业、开源混合闭环系统)社区中使用 DOC 的情况,4 篇与 DIY 无关。在后 4 篇中,所有研究均为横断面研究,描述了患者报告的结果。两项研究报告了使用 DOC 可降低 A1C,两项研究表明使用 DOC 与高自我效能相关,一项研究表明与更高的自我护理水平相关,一项研究表明与人群正常水平相比,生活质量评分更高。所有 DIY 研究均显示,在使用带有 DOC 支持的传感器增强型泵技术后,血糖控制得到改善。在环境扫描中审查的 54 个 DOC 网站中,有 29 个被纳入。糖尿病在线社区在社交媒体平台和针对的糖尿病类型方面存在差异。

结论

糖尿病在线社区有可能改善临床、行为和心理社会结果。需要进行随机对照试验和/或纵向前瞻性研究来进一步评估使用 DOC 的潜在益处。糖尿病在线社区种类繁多,涵盖各种社交媒体平台,为临床医生提供了根据个人情况为患者推荐使用 DOC 的机会。