• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于双层置信规则基模型的驾驶愤怒检测:使用人类、车辆和环境特征的自然实验研究。

A Double-Layered Belief Rule Base Model for Driving Anger Detection Using Human, Vehicle, and Environment Characteristics: A Naturalistic Experimental Study.

机构信息

School of Transportation and Logistics, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China.

Tsinghua University Suzhou Automotive Research Institute, Suzhou 215134, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jan 28;2022:5698393. doi: 10.1155/2022/5698393. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/5698393
PMID:35126496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8816564/
Abstract

"Road rage," namely, driving anger, has been becoming increasingly common in auto era. As "road rage" has serious negative impact on road safety, it has attracted great concern to relevant scholar, practitioner, and governor. This study aims to propose a model to effectively and efficiently detect driving anger states with different intensities for taking targeted intervening measures in intelligent connected vehicles. Forty-two private car drivers were enrolled to conduct naturalistic experiments on a predetermined and busy route in Wuhan, China, where drivers' anger can be induced by various incentive events like weaving/cutting in line, jaywalking, and traffic congestion. Then, a data-driven model based on double-layered belief rule base is proposed according to the accumulation of the naturalistic experiments data. The proposed model can be used to effectively detect different driving anger states as a function of driver characteristics, vehicle motion, and driving environments. The study results indicate that average accuracy of the proposed model is 82.52% for all four-intensity driving anger states (none, low, medium, and high), which is 1.15%, 1.52%, 3.53%, 5.75%, and 7.42%, higher than C4.5, BPNN, NBC, SVM, and kNN, respectively. Moreover, the runtime ratio of the proposed model is superior to that of those models except for C4.5. Hence, the proposed model can be implemented in connected intelligent vehicle for detecting driving anger states in real time.

摘要

“路怒症”,即驾驶愤怒,在汽车时代变得越来越普遍。由于“路怒症”对道路安全有严重的负面影响,它引起了相关学者、从业者和政府的极大关注。本研究旨在提出一个模型,以有效地检测不同强度的驾驶愤怒状态,以便在智能互联车辆中采取有针对性的干预措施。

四十二名私家车驾驶员在中国武汉的一条预定繁忙路线上进行了自然主义实验,在那里,驾驶员的愤怒可以通过各种激励事件(如穿插、乱穿马路和交通拥堵)引发。然后,根据自然主义实验数据的积累,提出了一种基于双层置信规则库的数据驱动模型。

所提出的模型可以有效地检测不同的驾驶愤怒状态,作为驾驶员特征、车辆运动和驾驶环境的函数。研究结果表明,所提出的模型对所有四个强度的驾驶愤怒状态(无、低、中、高)的平均准确率为 82.52%,分别比 C4.5、BPNN、NBC、SVM 和 kNN 高出 1.15%、1.52%、3.53%、5.75%和 7.42%。此外,所提出模型的运行时间比除 C4.5 之外的其他模型都要优越。因此,所提出的模型可以在联网智能车辆中实时检测驾驶愤怒状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/7d014ba7c0c6/CIN2022-5698393.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/64db961fe6cc/CIN2022-5698393.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/0e721d693ded/CIN2022-5698393.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/5750abdc6c63/CIN2022-5698393.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/3bcacb85b980/CIN2022-5698393.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/777905bb73b6/CIN2022-5698393.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/1673e3d9acf8/CIN2022-5698393.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/7d014ba7c0c6/CIN2022-5698393.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/64db961fe6cc/CIN2022-5698393.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/0e721d693ded/CIN2022-5698393.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/5750abdc6c63/CIN2022-5698393.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/3bcacb85b980/CIN2022-5698393.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/777905bb73b6/CIN2022-5698393.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/1673e3d9acf8/CIN2022-5698393.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5b0/8816564/7d014ba7c0c6/CIN2022-5698393.007.jpg

相似文献

1
A Double-Layered Belief Rule Base Model for Driving Anger Detection Using Human, Vehicle, and Environment Characteristics: A Naturalistic Experimental Study.基于双层置信规则基模型的驾驶愤怒检测:使用人类、车辆和环境特征的自然实验研究。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jan 28;2022:5698393. doi: 10.1155/2022/5698393. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.基于自然驾驶数据的驾驶员减速行为分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(1):42-47. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1707194. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Work Environment, Stress, and Driving Anger: A Structural Equation Model for Predicting Traffic Sanctions of Public Transport Drivers.工作环境、压力与驾驶怒气:预测公共交通驾驶员交通违规行为的结构方程模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 12;15(3):497. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030497.
4
Quantifying visual road environment to establish a speeding prediction model: An examination using naturalistic driving data.量化视觉道路环境以建立超速预测模型:使用自然驾驶数据的检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
5
The role of anger rumination as a mediator in the relationship between driver moral disengagement and driving angry.愤怒沉思在驾驶员道德脱离与愤怒驾驶关系中作为中介变量的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 5;10(8):e29112. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29112. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
6
Driving Anger, Aberrant Driving Behaviors, and Road Crash Risk: Testing of a Mediated Model.驾驶愤怒、异常驾驶行为与道路碰撞风险:中介模型检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 22;16(3):297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030297.
7
Driving anger among motor vehicle drivers in China: A cross-sectional survey.中国机动车驾驶员驾车愤怒情绪的横断面调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):570-574. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1623396. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.利用 SHRP2 自然驾驶数据检测变道行为:机器学习技术的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105578. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105578. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
A questionnaire survey on road rage and anger-provoking situations in China.中国路怒症及愤怒诱发情境的问卷调查
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:210-221. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? Risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control.驾驶员在跟车行驶时如何应对驾驶风险?风险响应驾驶员模型及其在类人纵向控制中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105783. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105783. Epub 2020 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Retracted: A Double-Layered Belief Rule Base Model for Driving Anger Detection Using Human, Vehicle, and Environment Characteristics: A Naturalistic Experimental Study.撤回:一种使用人、车辆和环境特征进行驾驶愤怒检测的双层信念规则库模型:一项自然主义实验研究。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Oct 4;2023:9793263. doi: 10.1155/2023/9793263. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Integration of Body Sensor Networks and Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks for Traffic Safety.用于交通安全的人体传感器网络与车载自组织网络的集成
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jan 15;16(1):107. doi: 10.3390/s16010107.
2
Identification of common features of vehicle motion under drowsy/distracted driving: A case study in Wuhan, China.疲劳/分心驾驶状态下车辆运动共同特征识别:以中国武汉为例的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
3
Modeling anger and aggressive driving behavior in a dynamic choice-latent variable model.
在动态选择-潜变量模型中对愤怒和攻击性驾驶行为进行建模。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
4
Introducing a multivariate model for predicting driving performance: the role of driving anger and personal characteristics.引入一个预测驾驶性能的多变量模型:驾驶愤怒和个人特征的作用。
J Safety Res. 2013 Dec;47:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
5
Driving anger and its expressions: further evidence of validity and reliability for the Driving Anger Expression Inventory French adaptation.驾驶愤怒及其表现:驾驶愤怒表达量表法语改编版的有效性和可靠性的进一步证据。
J Safety Res. 2010 Oct;41(5):417-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving.在预测不安全驾驶行为方面的驾驶愤怒、寻求刺激、冲动性和易无聊倾向。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Mar;37(2):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006.
7
Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving.好斗的人也是攻击性强的司机吗?一项关于自我报告的一般攻击性、司机愤怒情绪与攻击性驾驶之间关系的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2001 Mar;33(2):243-55. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00039-7.