• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在动态选择-潜变量模型中对愤怒和攻击性驾驶行为进行建模。

Modeling anger and aggressive driving behavior in a dynamic choice-latent variable model.

作者信息

Danaf Mazen, Abou-Zeid Maya, Kaysi Isam

机构信息

American University of Beirut, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.012
PMID:25460097
Abstract

This paper develops a hybrid choice-latent variable model combined with a Hidden Markov model in order to analyze the causes of aggressive driving and forecast its manifestations accordingly. The model is grounded in the state-trait anger theory; it treats trait driving anger as a latent variable that is expressed as a function of individual characteristics, or as an agent effect, and state anger as a dynamic latent variable that evolves over time and affects driving behavior, and that is expressed as a function of trait anger, frustrating events, and contextual variables (e.g., geometric roadway features, flow conditions, etc.). This model may be used in order to test measures aimed at reducing aggressive driving behavior and improving road safety, and can be incorporated into micro-simulation packages to represent aggressive driving. The paper also presents an application of this model to data obtained from a driving simulator experiment performed at the American University of Beirut. The results derived from this application indicate that state anger at a specific time period is significantly affected by the occurrence of frustrating events, trait anger, and the anger experienced at the previous time period. The proposed model exhibited a better goodness of fit compared to a similar simple joint model where driving behavior and decisions are expressed as a function of the experienced events explicitly and not the dynamic latent variable.

摘要

本文开发了一种结合隐马尔可夫模型的混合选择-潜变量模型,以分析攻击性驾驶的成因并据此预测其表现形式。该模型基于状态-特质愤怒理论;它将特质驾驶愤怒视为一个潜变量,该潜变量表示为个体特征的函数,或作为一种主体效应,而状态愤怒则视为一个动态潜变量,其随时间演变并影响驾驶行为,并且表示为特质愤怒、令人沮丧的事件和情境变量(例如,道路几何特征、交通流状况等)的函数。该模型可用于测试旨在减少攻击性驾驶行为和提高道路安全的措施,并可纳入微观模拟程序包以表示攻击性驾驶。本文还介绍了该模型在美国贝鲁特美国大学进行的驾驶模拟器实验所获数据中的应用。该应用得出的结果表明,特定时间段内的状态愤怒受令人沮丧的事件的发生、特质愤怒以及上一时间段所经历的愤怒的显著影响。与类似的简单联合模型相比,所提出的模型表现出更好的拟合优度,在简单联合模型中,驾驶行为和决策明确表示为所经历事件的函数,而非动态潜变量的函数。

相似文献

1
Modeling anger and aggressive driving behavior in a dynamic choice-latent variable model.在动态选择-潜变量模型中对愤怒和攻击性驾驶行为进行建模。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:105-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
2
Effect of exposure to aggressive stimuli on aggressive driving behavior at pedestrian crossings at unmarked roadways.暴露于激进刺激下对无标志道路路口行人穿越激进驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Mar;88:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.026. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Psychometric examination and validation of the aggressive driving scale (ADS).攻击性驾驶量表(ADS)的心理测量学检验与验证
Aggress Behav. 2016 Jul;42(4):313-23. doi: 10.1002/ab.21627. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Angry drivers: a test of state-trait theory.愤怒的司机:特质-状态理论的一项测试。
Violence Vict. 2005 Aug;20(4):455-69.
5
Driving anger and metacognition: the role of thought confidence on anger and aggressive driving intentions.驾驶愤怒与元认知:思维自信对愤怒和攻击性驾驶意图的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):323-34. doi: 10.1002/ab.21484. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
The influence of impulsivity and the Dark Triad on self-reported aggressive driving behaviours.冲动性和黑暗人格三联征对自我报告的攻击性驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Nov;120:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Forgivingness, anger, and hostility in aggressive driving.攻击性驾驶中的宽容、愤怒和敌意。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
8
Trait Predictors of Aggression and Crash-Related Behaviors Across Drivers from the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic.英国和爱尔兰共和国驾驶员攻击性行为及与撞车相关行为的特质预测因素
Risk Anal. 2015 Sep;35(9):1730-45. doi: 10.1111/risa.12379. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
9
Warning drivers about potential congestion as a means to reduce frustration-driven aggressive driving.向司机警告潜在的拥堵情况,以此作为减少因沮丧情绪导致的攻击性驾驶行为的一种手段。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Aug;10(4):354-60. doi: 10.1080/15389580902969765.
10
Driving aggression in forensic and non-forensic populations: relationships to self-reported levels of aggression, anger and impulsivity.法医群体和非法医群体中的驾驶攻击性:与自我报告的攻击、愤怒和冲动水平的关系。
Br J Psychol. 2006 Aug;97(Pt 3):387-403. doi: 10.1348/000712605X79111.

引用本文的文献

1
A Double-Layered Belief Rule Base Model for Driving Anger Detection Using Human, Vehicle, and Environment Characteristics: A Naturalistic Experimental Study.基于双层置信规则基模型的驾驶愤怒检测:使用人类、车辆和环境特征的自然实验研究。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jan 28;2022:5698393. doi: 10.1155/2022/5698393. eCollection 2022.
2
A Recognition Method of Aggressive Driving Behavior Based on Ensemble Learning.基于集成学习的激进驾驶行为识别方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;22(2):644. doi: 10.3390/s22020644.
3
Determining Risky Driving according to the Constructs of Mentalization and Personality Organization with the Modifying Role of Aggressive Driving.
根据心理化和人格组织的结构,并考虑攻击性驾驶的调节作用来确定危险驾驶。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;14(4):274-282.