• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持儿科风湿性疾病联合照护的电子仪表盘协同设计:以人为本的设计与可用性测试

Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.

作者信息

Taxter Alysha, Johnson Lisa, Tabussi Doreen, Kimura Yukiko, Donaldson Brittany, Lawson Erica, Del Gaizo Vincent, Vitelli Daniela, Pinter Corinne, Van Citters Aricca, Nelson Eugene, Lee Tzielan

机构信息

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.

Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2022 Apr 22;14(1):e34735. doi: 10.2196/34735.

DOI:10.2196/34735
PMID:35133283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9077505/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coproduction of care involves patients and families partnering with their clinicians and care teams, with the premise that each brings their own perspective, knowledge, and expertise, as well as their own values, goals, and preferences, to the partnership. Dashboards can display meaningful patient and clinical data to assess how a patient is doing and inform shared decision-making. Increasing communication between patients and care teams is particularly important for children with chronic conditions. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the most common chronic pediatric rheumatic condition, is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to design a dashboard prototype for use in coproducing care in patients with JIA. We evaluated the use and needs of end users, obtained a consensus on the necessary dashboard data elements, and constructed display prototypes to inform meaningful discussions for coproduction.

METHODS

A human-centered design approach involving parents, patients, clinicians, and care team members was used to develop a dashboard to support the coproduction of care in 4 ambulatory pediatric rheumatology clinics. We engaged a multidisciplinary team (n=18) of patients, parents, clinicians, nurses, and staff during an in-person kick-off meeting followed by biweekly meetings. We also leveraged advisory panels. Teams mapped workflows and patient journeys, created personas, and developed dashboard sketches. The final dashboard components were determined via Delphi consensus voting. Low-tech dashboard testing was completed during clinic visits, and visual display prototypes were iterated by using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Patients and clinicians were surveyed regarding their experiences.

RESULTS

Teams achieved consensus on what data mattered most at the point of care to support patients with JIA, families, and clinicians collaborating to make the best possible health care decisions. Notable themes included the right data in the right place at the right time, data in once for multiple purposes, patient and family self-management components, and the opportunity for education and increased transparency. A final set of 11 dashboard data elements was identified, including patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and medications. Important design considerations featured the incorporation of real-time data, clearly labeled graphs, and vertical orientation to facilitate review and discussion. Prototype paper-testing with 36 patients and families yielded positive feedback, with 89% (8/9) to 100% (9/9) of parents (n=9) and 80% (8/10) to 90% (9/10) of clinicians (n=10) strongly agreeing or agreeing that the dashboard was useful during clinic discussions, helped to talk about what mattered most, and informed health care decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a dashboard prototype that displays patient-reported and clinical data over time, along with medications that can be used during a clinic visit to support meaningful conversations and shared decision-making among patients with JIA, their families, and their clinicians and care teams.

摘要

背景

共同照护涉及患者及其家庭与临床医生和照护团队合作,前提是各方在合作中都能带来自己的观点、知识和专业技能,以及自身的价值观、目标和偏好。仪表盘可以展示有意义的患者和临床数据,以评估患者的状况并为共同决策提供信息。加强患者与照护团队之间的沟通对患有慢性病的儿童尤为重要。幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)是最常见的儿童慢性风湿性疾病,与疼痛加剧、功能下降和生活质量降低有关。

目的

本研究的目的是设计一个仪表盘原型,用于JIA患者的共同照护。我们评估了最终用户的使用情况和需求,就仪表盘所需的数据元素达成了共识,并构建了展示原型,以便为共同照护进行有意义的讨论提供信息。

方法

采用以用户为中心的设计方法,让家长、患者、临床医生和照护团队成员参与,开发一个仪表盘,以支持4家儿科门诊风湿科诊所的共同照护。在一次面对面的启动会议及随后的双周会议期间,我们让一个由患者、家长、临床医生、护士和工作人员组成的多学科团队(n = 18)参与其中。我们还利用了咨询小组。各团队绘制了工作流程和患者就医过程,创建了人物角色,并绘制了仪表盘草图。最终的仪表盘组件通过德尔菲共识投票确定。在门诊就诊期间完成了低技术仪表盘测试,并使用计划-执行-研究-行动方法对视觉展示原型进行了迭代。对患者和临床医生的体验进行了调查。

结果

各团队就护理点最重要的数据达成了共识,这些数据可支持JIA患者、其家庭和临床医生共同做出最佳的医疗决策。显著的主题包括在正确的时间、正确的地点提供正确的数据,数据一次录入、多方使用,患者和家庭自我管理组件,以及教育和提高透明度的机会。确定了一组最终的11个仪表盘数据元素,包括患者报告的结果、临床数据和药物。重要的设计考虑因素包括纳入实时数据、清晰标注的图表以及纵向布局,以方便查看和讨论。对36名患者及其家庭进行的原型纸质测试获得了积极反馈,89%(8/9)至100%(9/9)的家长(n = 9)以及80%(8/10)至90%(9/10)的临床医生(n = 10)强烈同意或同意仪表盘在门诊讨论中很有用,有助于谈论最重要的事情,并为医疗决策提供信息。

结论

我们开发了一个仪表盘原型,可随时间展示患者报告的数据和临床数据,以及在门诊就诊期间可使用的药物信息,以支持JIA患者及其家庭、临床医生和照护团队之间进行有意义的对话和共同决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/17f9fd809e9f/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/4cb6283a1c87/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/e82f498df02c/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/a72a99df5d0b/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/9c66e43a342c/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/2ec79fe45c59/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/7207e66c0246/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/17f9fd809e9f/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/4cb6283a1c87/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/e82f498df02c/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/a72a99df5d0b/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/9c66e43a342c/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/2ec79fe45c59/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/7207e66c0246/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/9077505/17f9fd809e9f/jopm_v14i1e34735_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.支持儿科风湿性疾病联合照护的电子仪表盘协同设计:以人为本的设计与可用性测试
J Particip Med. 2022 Apr 22;14(1):e34735. doi: 10.2196/34735.
2
Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.使用风湿病仪表盘加强护理伙伴关系:汇集对患者和临床医生最重要的因素。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;5(4):190-200. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11533. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Point-of-care dashboards promote coproduction of healthcare services for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.即时护理仪表板促进了炎症性肠病患者医疗服务的共同生产。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii40-ii47. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab067.
4
Patient-Reported Outcome Dashboards Within the Electronic Health Record to Support Shared Decision-making: Protocol for Co-design and Clinical Evaluation With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease.电子健康记录中的患者报告结局仪表盘以支持共同决策:与晚期癌症和慢性肾脏病患者共同设计和临床评估的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Sep 21;11(9):e38461. doi: 10.2196/38461.
5
Developing an Intranet-Based Lymphedema Dashboard for Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams: Design Research Study.为乳腺癌多学科团队开发基于内联网的淋巴水肿信息平台:设计研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e13188. doi: 10.2196/13188.
6
Development and Acceptability of a Patient Decision Aid for Pain Management in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: The JIA Option Map.《青少年特发性关节炎患者疼痛管理决策辅助工具的制定与可接受性研究:JIA 选择图》。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00458-z. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study.利用技术接受模型评估临床医生对类风湿关节炎结果仪表板的看法和体验:定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 May 27;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02530-2.
9
Developing an Audit and Feedback Dashboard for Family Physicians: User-Centered Design Process.为家庭医生开发审计和反馈仪表板:以用户为中心的设计过程。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Nov 9;10:e47718. doi: 10.2196/47718.
10
Formative evaluation of a dashboard to support coproduction of healthcare services in cystic fibrosis.支持囊性纤维化医疗服务共同生产的仪表盘的形成性评价。
J Cyst Fibros. 2020 Sep;19(5):768-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of personas to involve consumers in healthcare co-design: a scoping review.运用人物角色让消费者参与医疗保健协同设计:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 6;25(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12786-7.
2
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
3
A Collection of Components to Design Clinical Dashboards Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Point-of-care dashboards promote coproduction of healthcare services for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.即时护理仪表板促进了炎症性肠病患者医疗服务的共同生产。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii40-ii47. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab067.
2
Technology-Enabled Health Care Collaboration in Pediatric Chronic Illness: Pre-Post Interventional Study for Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Impact of an Electronic Health Record-Linked Platform for Patient-Clinician Partnership.电子病历关联平台促进儿科慢性病医患合作的技术研究:干预前后研究评估其可行性、可接受性和临床影响
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 26;8(11):e11968. doi: 10.2196/11968.
3
纳入患者报告结局指标的临床仪表盘设计组件集:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 2;26:e55267. doi: 10.2196/55267.
4
Electronic health record modification and dashboard development to improve clinical care in pediatric rheumatology.电子健康记录修改与仪表板开发以改善儿科风湿病的临床护理。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Aug 13;12:1428792. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1428792. eCollection 2024.
5
Implementation of a Co-Design Strategy to Develop a Dashboard to Support Shared Decision Making in Advanced Cancer and Chronic Kidney Disease.实施一项协同设计策略,以开发一个仪表板,支持晚期癌症和慢性肾脏病的共同决策。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 17;13(14):4178. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144178.
6
Digital health: dashboards, dashboards, everywhere.数字健康:仪表盘无处不在。
Aust Prescr. 2024 Apr;47(2):46-47. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.009.
7
Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.使用风湿病仪表盘加强护理伙伴关系:汇集对患者和临床医生最重要的因素。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;5(4):190-200. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11533. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
How children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis participate in their healthcare: health professionals' views.
儿童和青少年特发性关节炎患者如何参与自身医疗保健:卫生专业人员的观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 May;44(10):1908-1915. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1811406. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Identifying clinically meaningful severity categories for PROMIS pediatric measures of anxiety, mobility, fatigue, and depressive symptoms in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.确定青少年特发性关节炎和儿童发病的系统性红斑狼疮中 PROMIS 儿童焦虑、移动性、疲劳和抑郁症状测量的有临床意义的严重程度类别。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2573-2584. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02513-6. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Formative evaluation of a dashboard to support coproduction of healthcare services in cystic fibrosis.支持囊性纤维化医疗服务共同生产的仪表盘的形成性评价。
J Cyst Fibros. 2020 Sep;19(5):768-776. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: what is the optimal target definition to reach all goals?治疗幼年特发性关节炎的目标:达到所有目标的最佳目标定义是什么?
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020 Apr 16;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00428-7.
7
Patient and clinician perspectives on a patient-facing dashboard that visualizes patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.患者和临床医生对类风湿关节炎患者报告结局可视化的面向患者的仪表盘的看法。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):846-859. doi: 10.1111/hex.13057. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
8
A Canadian evaluation framework for quality improvement in childhood arthritis: key performance indicators of the process of care.加拿大儿童关节炎质量改进评估框架:护理过程的关键绩效指标。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Mar 19;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02151-w.
9
Coproduction: when users define quality.共同生产:用户定义质量之时。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):711-716. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009830. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Non-Systemic Polyarthritis, Sacroiliitis, and Enthesitis.2019 年美国风湿病学会/关节炎基金会治疗幼年特发性关节炎指南:非系统性多关节炎、骶髂关节炎和附着点炎的治疗方法。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jun;71(6):717-734. doi: 10.1002/acr.23870. Epub 2019 Apr 25.