Fall M, Ahlstrom K, Carlsson C A, Ek A, Erlandson B E, Frankenberg S, Mattiasson A
Urology. 1986 Mar;27(3):282-7. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90295-5.
The clinical efficacy of a new device for treatment of female incontinence was studied in a multicenter trial. The device consists of an inflatable electrode carrier and an external stimulator unit. Forty women were treated: 10 had primary or recurrent genuine stress incontinence, 15 had urge incontinence due to idiopathic detrusor instability, not responding to drug treatment, and 15 had stress incontinence combined with detrusor instability. Twenty-five patients were improved by the treatment. Another 8 reported an excellent result of treatment and remained free of symptoms for more than six months after withdrawal of the treatment. The results were more favorable in patients with bladder hyperactivity than in genuine stress incontinence. The patients' general ratings of treatment efficacy correlated well with their recordings of urinary frequency and consumption of incontinence pads. The functional bladder capacity increased in improved patients, but normalization of urodynamic parameters was no prerequisite for clinical improvement. We found intravaginal electrical stimulation to be a valuable alternative to medical and surgical intervention in patients with detrusor instability.
在一项多中心试验中研究了一种治疗女性尿失禁的新设备的临床疗效。该设备由一个可充气的电极载体和一个外部刺激器单元组成。40名女性接受了治疗:10名患有原发性或复发性真性压力性尿失禁,15名因特发性逼尿肌不稳定导致急迫性尿失禁,对药物治疗无反应,15名患有压力性尿失禁合并逼尿肌不稳定。25名患者通过治疗得到改善。另外8名报告治疗效果极佳,在停止治疗后六个月以上无症状。膀胱活动亢进患者的结果比真性压力性尿失禁患者更有利。患者对治疗效果的总体评价与其尿频记录和尿失禁垫使用量密切相关。改善患者的功能性膀胱容量增加,但尿动力学参数正常化不是临床改善的先决条件。我们发现阴道内电刺激是逼尿肌不稳定患者药物和手术干预的一种有价值的替代方法。