Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Feb 10;10(2):e30272. doi: 10.2196/30272.
Workplace-based mindfulness programs have good evidence for improving employee stress and mental health outcomes, but less is known about their effects on productivity and citizenship behaviors. Most of the available evidence is derived from studies of mindfulness programs that use class-based approaches. Mindfulness apps can increase access to training, but whether self-directed app use is sufficient to realize benefits equivalent to class-based mindfulness programs is unknown.
We assessed the effectiveness of a mindfulness app, both with and without supporting classes, for reducing employees' perceived stress. Changes in mindfulness, mental health, quality of life, perceptions of job demand, control and support, productivity indicators, organizational citizenship, and mindful behaviors at work were also investigated.
Tasmanian State Service employees were invited by the Tasmanian Training Consortium to a 3-arm randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a mindfulness app on stress. The app used in the Smiling Mind Workplace Program formed the basis of the intervention. The app includes lessons, activities, and guided meditations, and is supported by 4 instructional emails delivered over 8 weeks. Engagement with the app for 10-20 minutes, 5 days a week, was recommended. Reported data were collected at baseline (time point 0), 3 months from baseline (time point 1 [T1]), and at 6-month follow-up (time point 2). At time point 0, participants could nominate a work-based observer to answer surveys about participants' behaviors. Eligible participants (n=211) were randomly assigned to self-guided app use plus four 1-hour classes (app+classes: 70/211, 33.2%), self-guided app use (app-only: 71/211, 33.6%), or waitlist control (WLC; 70/211, 33.2%). Linear mixed effects models were used to assess changes in the active groups compared with the WLC at T1 and for a head-to-head comparison of the app+classes and app-only groups at follow-up.
App use time was considerably lower than recommended (app+classes: 120/343 minutes; app-only: 45/343 minutes). Compared with the WLC at T1, no significant change in perceived stress was observed in either active group. However, the app+classes group reported lower psychological distress (β=-1.77, SE 0.75; P=.02; Cohen d=-0.21) and higher mindfulness (β=.31, SE 0.12; P=.01; Cohen d=0.19). These effects were retained in the app+classes group at 6 months. No significant changes were observed for the app-only group or for other outcomes. There were no significant changes in observer measures at T1, but by time point 2, the app+classes participants were more noticeably mindful and altruistic at work than app-only participants.
Including classes in the training protocol appears to have motivated engagement and led to benefits, whereas self-guided app use did not realize any significant results. Effect sizes were smaller and less consistent than meta-estimates for class-based mindfulness training.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12617001386325; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372942&isReview.
基于工作场所的正念项目在改善员工压力和心理健康结果方面有很好的证据,但对于它们对生产力和公民行为的影响知之甚少。大多数现有证据来自使用基于课堂的方法的正念项目研究。正念应用程序可以增加培训的可及性,但自我指导的应用程序使用是否足以实现等同于基于课堂的正念项目的收益尚不清楚。
我们评估了正念应用程序(包括有和没有支持课程的情况)在降低员工感知压力方面的有效性。还调查了正念、心理健康、生活质量、工作需求、控制和支持的感知变化、生产力指标、组织公民和工作中的正念行为。
塔斯马尼亚州服务员工受到塔斯马尼亚培训联盟的邀请,参加了一项 3 臂随机对照试验,研究正念应用程序对压力的影响。Smiling Mind Workplace Program 中使用的应用程序构成了干预措施的基础。该应用程序包括课程、活动和引导冥想,并通过 8 周内发送的 4 封指导电子邮件提供支持。建议每周 5 天,每天使用 10-20 分钟的应用程序。基线(时间点 0)、从基线开始 3 个月(时间点 1 [T1])和 6 个月随访(时间点 2)时收集报告数据。在时间点 0,参与者可以提名一名基于工作的观察员来回答关于参与者行为的调查。符合条件的参与者(n=211)被随机分配到自我指导应用程序使用加四门 1 小时的课程(app+classes:70/211,33.2%)、自我指导应用程序使用(app-only:71/211,33.6%)或候补名单控制(WLC;70/211,33.2%)。使用线性混合效应模型评估与 WLC 相比,在 T1 时活跃组的变化,并对随访时 app+classes 和 app-only 组进行头对头比较。
应用程序的使用时间远低于建议的时间(app+classes:120/343 分钟;app-only:45/343 分钟)。与 T1 时的 WLC 相比,活跃组中没有观察到感知压力的显著变化。然而,app+classes 组报告的心理困扰较低(β=-1.77,SE 0.75;P=.02;Cohen d=-0.21),正念水平较高(β=.31,SE 0.12;P=.01;Cohen d=0.19)。这些效果在 6 个月时仍保留在 app+classes 组中。在 app-only 组或其他结果中没有观察到显著变化。在 T1 时没有观察到观察员测量的显著变化,但到时间点 2 时,app+classes 组的员工在工作中比 app-only 组更明显地具有正念和利他主义。
在培训方案中纳入课程似乎激发了参与度,并带来了益处,而自我指导的应用程序使用并没有产生任何显著的结果。与基于课堂的正念培训的荟萃估计相比,效果大小更小且不那么一致。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册 ACTRN12617001386325;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372942&isReview。