Centre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, ST4 2DF, Stoke on Trent, UK.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Feb 10;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00519-6.
Footwear has been documented as a significant factor in the aetiology of foot pain in the general population. Assessing footwear in a clinical setting continues to be practitioner specific and there is limited guidance to direct advice. Health professionals must have access to clinically appropriate and reliable footwear assessment tools to educate patients on healthier footwear choices. The primary aim of this study was to critique what elements should be in a footwear assessment tool with a secondary aim of testing the agreed tool for validity.A combined Nominal Group Technique and then a Delphi technique from purposively sampled experts of foot health professions were employed to critique elements of footwear assessment. The agreed tool was then tested by practising podiatrists on 5 different shoes to assess the validity and reliability of the measures.Twelve test evaluation criteria were identified receiving significant ratings to form the final footwear assessment tool consisting of five footwear themes. Application of the tool in a clinical setting validated the themes of footwear characteristics, footwear structure, motion control and wear patterns. However, the assessment of footwear fit was not reliable.The footwear tool was refined based on the collective consensus achieved from the rounds creating a more clinically appropriate tool. The validity of this tool was assessed as high in some of the themes but for those that were lower, a training need was identified.
footwear has been documented as a significant factor in the aetiology of foot pain in the general population. 鞋子已被记录为普通人群足部疼痛病因学中的一个重要因素。
Assessing footwear in a clinical setting continues to be practitioner specific and there is limited guidance to direct advice. 在临床环境中评估鞋子仍然是特定于从业者的,并且指导有限,无法提供直接建议。
Health professionals must have access to clinically appropriate and reliable footwear assessment tools to educate patients on healthier footwear choices. 健康专业人员必须能够获得临床适用且可靠的鞋子评估工具,以便就更健康的鞋子选择向患者提供教育。
The primary aim of this study was to critique what elements should be in a footwear assessment tool with a secondary aim of testing the agreed tool for validity. 本研究的主要目的是批评鞋子评估工具中应包含哪些要素,次要目的是测试商定的工具的有效性。
A combined Nominal Group Technique and then a Delphi technique from purposively sampled experts of foot health professions were employed to critique elements of footwear assessment. 采用组合名义小组技术和随后的德尔菲技术,对足部健康专业人员的有目的抽样专家进行鞋子评估要素的批评。
The agreed tool was then tested by practising podiatrists on 5 different shoes to assess the validity and reliability of the measures. 然后,由执业足病医生在 5 双不同的鞋子上测试商定的工具,以评估这些措施的有效性和可靠性。
Twelve test evaluation criteria were identified receiving significant ratings to form the final footwear assessment tool consisting of five footwear themes. 确定了 12 项测试评估标准,这些标准得到了显著的评分,从而形成了由五个鞋子主题组成的最终鞋子评估工具。
Application of the tool in a clinical setting validated the themes of footwear characteristics, footwear structure, motion control and wear patterns. 在临床环境中应用该工具验证了鞋子特征、鞋子结构、运动控制和磨损模式等主题。
However, the assessment of footwear fit was not reliable. 然而,鞋子合脚度的评估不可靠。
The footwear tool was refined based on the collective consensus achieved from the rounds creating a more clinically appropriate tool. 基于回合中达成的集体共识,对鞋子工具进行了改进,创建了一个更适合临床的工具。
The validity of this tool was assessed as high in some of the themes but for those that were lower, a training need was identified. 该工具在一些主题中的有效性被评估为较高,但对于那些较低的主题,确定了培训需求。