• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙患者中鞋类评估工具的重复性和可靠性:跨文化适应性研究。

Repeatability and reliability of the footwear assessment tool in Spanish patients: A transcultural adaptation.

作者信息

Navarro-Flores Emmanuel, Losa-Iglesias Marta Elena, Casado-Hernández Israel, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo Ricardo, Romero-Morales Carlos, Palomo-López Patricia, López-López Daniel, Jiménez-Cebrián Ana María

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, Frailty Research Organizaded Group, Spain.

Faculty of Health Sciences. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922, Alcorcón, Spain.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2023 Feb;32(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.006
PMID:36564255
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The footwear assessment tool was designed to advise an appropriate footwear for each situation and patient. Footwear alterations structures can influence in musculoskeletal disorders, developing foot ulcers, increase the peak plantar pressure, bacterial growth, low back pain.

METHODS

To validate the study 101 subjects were recruited. The study was tested by two expert podiatrists using the tool for the assessment of footwear characteristics that is composed by five domains, fit, general features, general structure, motion control properties and cushioning system. Each domain analyzes different shoe items.

RESULTS

An excellent agreement between the test-retest. A suitable Cronbach's α was suggested for the five domains of fit (α = 0.952), general features (α = 0.953), general structure (α = 0.947), motion control properties (α = 0.951), and cushioning system (α = 0.951). Test-retest reliability was excellent for all domains. There were no significant differences between any domain (p > 0.05). There was only statistically significant difference in the item forefoot height (p = 0.011). For all the domains items there were no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tool for the assessment European footwear is a suitable repeatability and reliability footwear tool that can be used in Spanish language subjects.

摘要

背景

鞋类评估工具旨在为每种情况和患者推荐合适的鞋类。鞋类结构的改变会影响肌肉骨骼疾病、足部溃疡的发生、足底压力峰值增加、细菌生长以及腰痛。

方法

为验证该研究,招募了101名受试者。该研究由两名专家足病医生使用鞋类特征评估工具进行测试,该工具由五个领域组成,即贴合度、一般特征、一般结构、运动控制特性和缓冲系统。每个领域分析不同的鞋类项目。

结果

重测之间具有极好的一致性。针对贴合度(α = 0.952)、一般特征(α = 0.953)、一般结构(α = 0.947)、运动控制特性(α = 0.951)和缓冲系统(α = 0.951)这五个领域,建议采用合适的克朗巴哈α系数。所有领域的重测信度都非常好。任何领域之间均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。仅前脚掌高度项目存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.011)。所有领域的项目均无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05)。

结论

欧洲鞋类评估工具是一种具有合适重复性和可靠性的鞋类工具,可用于说西班牙语的受试者。

相似文献

1
Repeatability and reliability of the footwear assessment tool in Spanish patients: A transcultural adaptation.西班牙患者中鞋类评估工具的重复性和可靠性:跨文化适应性研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Feb;32(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
Evaluation and optimisation of a footwear assessment tool for use within a clinical environment.在临床环境中使用的鞋类评估工具的评估和优化。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Feb 10;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00519-6.
3
Development and evaluation of a tool for the assessment of footwear characteristics.开发和评估一种用于评估鞋类特征的工具。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Apr 23;2:10. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-10.
4
Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.使用压力鞋垫比较现代跑鞋的鞋内负荷情况。
Ergonomics. 2008 Oct;51(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1080/00140130802239562.
5
Gender and leg-dominance differences in shoe properties and foot injuries in badminton: a cross-sectional survey.性别和腿部优势差异对羽毛球鞋性能和足部损伤的影响:一项横断面调查。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Apr 4;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00531-w.
6
Repeatability and reliability of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire in Arabic patients: A transcultural adaptation.阿拉伯语糖尿病足自我护理问卷的可重复性和可靠性:跨文化调适。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
7
Characteristics of footwear worn by people with systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison with age- and sex-matched healthy controls: a pilot study.系统性红斑狼疮患者所穿鞋子的特征:与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者的比较:一项试点研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Jul 5;11:38. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0280-3. eCollection 2018.
8
The running shoe comfort assessment tool (RUN-CAT): Development and evaluation of a new multi-item assessment tool for evaluating the comfort of running footwear.跑鞋舒适评估工具(RUN-CAT):一种新的多项目评估工具的开发和评估,用于评估跑鞋的舒适度。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Sep;38(18):2100-2107. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1773613. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
Data-driven directions for effective footwear provision for the high-risk diabetic foot.为高危糖尿病足提供有效鞋具的循证指南
Diabet Med. 2015 Jun;32(6):790-7. doi: 10.1111/dme.12741. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
10
Medical-grade footwear: the impact of fit and comfort.医疗级别的鞋类:适配和舒适度的影响。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jan 5;10:2. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0184-z. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Foot Measurements From Three-Dimensional Scans: Elinvision 3DST Reliability.三维扫描的足部测量:Elinvision 3DST的可靠性
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70070. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70070.
2
Influence of the center of pressure on baropodometric gait pattern variations in the adult population with flatfoot: A case-control study.压力中心对扁平足成年人群体足底压力步态模式变化的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 9;11:1147616. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1147616. eCollection 2023.