Chen Yuan, Zhai Meng Jiao, Mehwish Nabila, Xu Meng Die, Wang Yi, Gong Yi Xuan, Ren Man Man, Deng Hui, Lee Bae Hoon
Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325011, China; Department of Periodontics, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China.
Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325011, China.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2022 Apr 15;204:692-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
Bovine serum albumin methacryloyl (BSAMA) is a newly emerging photocurable globular protein-based material whereas gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) is one of the most popular photocurable fibrous protein-based materials. So far, the influence of their different structural conformations as building blocks on hydrogel properties and mineral deposition has not been investigated. Here, we compared their differences in structures, gelation kinetics, hydrogel properties, mineralization, and cell behaviors. BSAMA maintained a stable globular structure while GelMA exhibited temperature-sensitive conformations (4 - 37 °C). BSAMA displayed slower gelation kinetics and much more retarded enzymatic degradation compared to GelMA. Photocurable BSAMA (6.41 - 390.95 kPa) and GelMA hydrogels (36.09 - 199.70 kPa) exhibited tunable mechanical properties depending on their concentrations (10 - 20%). Interestingly, BSAMA hydrogels mineralized needle-like apatite (Ca/P: 1.409) with higher crystallinity compared to GelMA hydrogels (Ca/P: 1.344). BSAMA and GelMA supported satisfactory cell (MC3T3-L1) viability of 99.43 ± 0.57% and 97.14 ± 0.69%, respectively. However, BSAMA gels were less favorable to cell proliferation and migration than GelMA gels. In serum-free environments, cells on GelMA displayed a higher amount of attachment, a more elongated shape, and a longer protrusion compared to those on BSAMA (p < 0.01) during the early adhesion.
甲基丙烯酰化牛血清白蛋白(BSAMA)是一种新出现的基于光固化球状蛋白的材料,而甲基丙烯酰化明胶(GelMA)是最受欢迎的基于光固化纤维状蛋白的材料之一。到目前为止,尚未研究它们作为构建单元的不同结构构象对水凝胶性质和矿物质沉积的影响。在此,我们比较了它们在结构、凝胶化动力学、水凝胶性质、矿化和细胞行为方面的差异。BSAMA保持稳定的球状结构,而GelMA表现出温度敏感的构象(4 - 37°C)。与GelMA相比,BSAMA表现出较慢的凝胶化动力学和更缓慢的酶促降解。光固化的BSAMA(6.41 - 390.95 kPa)和GelMA水凝胶(36.09 - 199.70 kPa)根据其浓度(10 - 20%)表现出可调的力学性能。有趣的是,与GelMA水凝胶(Ca/P:1.344)相比,BSAMA水凝胶矿化出结晶度更高的针状磷灰石(Ca/P:1.409)。BSAMA和GelMA分别支持令人满意的细胞(MC3T3-L1)活力,分别为99.43±0.57%和97.14±0.69%。然而,与GelMA凝胶相比,BSAMA凝胶对细胞增殖和迁移的促进作用较小。在无血清环境中,在早期黏附过程中,与在BSAMA上的细胞相比,在GelMA上的细胞表现出更高的附着量、更细长的形状和更长的突起(p < 0.01)。