Nguyen Van Tai, Winterman Sabine, Playe Margot, Benbara Amélie, Zelek Laurent, Pamoukdjian Frédéric, Bousquet Guilhem
National Cancer Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology 1, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Avicenne, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, 93000 Bobigny, France.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;14(3):842. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030842.
We set out to demonstrate the benefit of using dose-intense cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival.
We searched through MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2021 to identify randomized clinical trials comparing the benefit of using cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local treatment with local treatment alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The PRISMA statement was applied.
Twenty-two randomized clinical trials were retrieved between 1991 and 2019, corresponding to 3632 women with FIGO stages IB2-IVA cervical cancer. More than 50% of the randomized clinical trials were assessed as having a low risk of bias. There was no benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival, but there was significant heterogeneity across studies (I = 45%, = 0.01). In contrast, dose-intense cisplatin at over 72.5 mg/m/3 weeks was significantly associated with increased overall survival (RR = 0.87, < 0.05) with no heterogeneity across the pooled studies (I = 36%, = 0.11). The survival benefit was even greater when cisplatin was administered at a dose over 105 mg/m/3 weeks (RR = 0.79, < 0.05).
Even though radiotherapy combined with weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, our meta-analysis makes it possible to consider the use of dose-intense cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy when local treatment is suboptimal and opens perspectives for designing new clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be proposed when surgery is local treatment instead of standard chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
我们旨在证明使用基于顺铂的剂量密集新辅助化疗在总生存期和无进展生存期方面的益处。
我们检索了截至2021年5月的MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以确定比较基于顺铂的新辅助化疗后进行局部治疗与单纯局部治疗对局部晚期宫颈癌治疗益处的随机临床试验。应用了PRISMA声明。
1991年至2019年间检索到22项随机临床试验,涉及3632例国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期为IB2-IVA期的宫颈癌女性。超过50%的随机临床试验被评估为偏倚风险较低。新辅助化疗对总生存期没有益处,但各研究之间存在显著异质性(I² = 45%,P = 0.01)。相比之下,每3周剂量超过72.5mg/m²的剂量密集顺铂与总生存期增加显著相关(风险比[RR]=0.87,P<0.05),汇总研究中无异质性(I² = 36%,P = 0.11)。当顺铂以超过105mg/m²/3周的剂量给药时,生存获益更大(RR = 0.79,P<0.05)。
尽管放疗联合每周基于顺铂的化疗仍然是局部晚期宫颈癌治疗的标准治疗方法,但我们的荟萃分析使得在局部治疗不理想时可以考虑使用基于顺铂的剂量密集新辅助化疗,并为在这种情况下设计新的临床试验开辟了前景。当手术作为局部治疗而非标准放化疗用于治疗局部晚期宫颈癌时,可以考虑新辅助化疗。