Suppr超能文献

《哥本哈根心理社会问卷葡萄牙语第三版:中间版本在市政和医疗保健工作者中的初步验证研究》。

The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers.

机构信息

Ergonomics Laboratory, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, 1499-002 Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.

CIAUD, Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-063 Alto da Ajuda, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3):1167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031167.

Abstract

A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study viewing the cross-cultural adaption of COPSOQ III to Portugal, ensuring the contents and face validity and performing field-testing in order to reduce the number of items and to obtain insight into the data structure, through classic test theory and item response theory approaches. The qualitative study encompassed 29 participants and the quantitative one 659 participants from municipalities and healthcare settings. Content analysis suggested that minor re-wording could improve the face validity of items, while a reduced version, with 85 items, shows psychometric stability, achieving good internal consistency in all subscales. The COPSOQ III Portuguese middle version proved to be a valid preliminary version for future validation studies with various populations, able to be used in correlational studies with other dimensions.

摘要

哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ III)的第三个版本是在国际范围内制定的,旨在应对工作条件、理论概念和国际经验的新趋势。本文旨在介绍 COPSOQ III 葡萄牙文中间版本的初步验证研究。这是一项探索性的横断面研究,旨在考察 COPSOQ III 对葡萄牙的跨文化适应性,确保内容和表面效度,并进行现场测试,以减少项目数量,并通过经典测试理论和项目反应理论方法深入了解数据结构。定性研究包括 29 名参与者,定量研究包括来自市镇和医疗保健环境的 659 名参与者。内容分析表明,稍微修改措辞可以提高项目的表面效度,而一个包含 85 个项目的简化版本显示出心理测量学的稳定性,在所有子量表中都达到了良好的内部一致性。COPSOQ III 葡萄牙文中间版本被证明是未来针对不同人群进行验证研究的有效初步版本,能够与其他维度进行相关研究。

相似文献

2
The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷第三版
Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

4
The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷第三版
Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis.二因素多分测验项目反应理论分析导论。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Feb;60:41-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验