• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《哥本哈根心理社会问卷葡萄牙语第三版:中间版本在市政和医疗保健工作者中的初步验证研究》。

The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers.

机构信息

Ergonomics Laboratory, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, 1499-002 Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.

CIAUD, Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-063 Alto da Ajuda, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3):1167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031167.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19031167
PMID:35162192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8834667/
Abstract

A third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) was developed internationally aiming to respond to new trends in working conditions, theoretical concepts, and international experience. This article aims to present the preliminary validation studies for the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III. This is an exploratory cross-sectional study viewing the cross-cultural adaption of COPSOQ III to Portugal, ensuring the contents and face validity and performing field-testing in order to reduce the number of items and to obtain insight into the data structure, through classic test theory and item response theory approaches. The qualitative study encompassed 29 participants and the quantitative one 659 participants from municipalities and healthcare settings. Content analysis suggested that minor re-wording could improve the face validity of items, while a reduced version, with 85 items, shows psychometric stability, achieving good internal consistency in all subscales. The COPSOQ III Portuguese middle version proved to be a valid preliminary version for future validation studies with various populations, able to be used in correlational studies with other dimensions.

摘要

哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ III)的第三个版本是在国际范围内制定的,旨在应对工作条件、理论概念和国际经验的新趋势。本文旨在介绍 COPSOQ III 葡萄牙文中间版本的初步验证研究。这是一项探索性的横断面研究,旨在考察 COPSOQ III 对葡萄牙的跨文化适应性,确保内容和表面效度,并进行现场测试,以减少项目数量,并通过经典测试理论和项目反应理论方法深入了解数据结构。定性研究包括 29 名参与者,定量研究包括来自市镇和医疗保健环境的 659 名参与者。内容分析表明,稍微修改措辞可以提高项目的表面效度,而一个包含 85 个项目的简化版本显示出心理测量学的稳定性,在所有子量表中都达到了良好的内部一致性。COPSOQ III 葡萄牙文中间版本被证明是未来针对不同人群进行验证研究的有效初步版本,能够与其他维度进行相关研究。

相似文献

1
The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers.《哥本哈根心理社会问卷葡萄牙语第三版:中间版本在市政和医疗保健工作者中的初步验证研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3):1167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031167.
2
The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷第三版
Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Validation of the medium and short version of CENSOPAS-COPSOQ: a psychometric study in the Peruvian population.中短版 CENSOPAS-COPSOQ 的验证:秘鲁人群的心理测量学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 7;22(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13328-0.
4
The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study.哥本哈根心理社会问卷II(COPSOQ II)葡萄牙语长版——一项效度研究。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017 Aug 9;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9. eCollection 2017.
5
[The third version of COPSOQ-Istas21. An updated international instrument for the workplace.].[《COPSOQ-Istas21第三版:工作场所最新国际工具》。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 May 28;95:e202105075.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the short version of COPSOQ II-Brazil.COPSOQ II-巴西短版的跨文化调适与心理计量特性。
Rev Saude Publica. 2021 Oct 25;55:69. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003123. eCollection 2021.
7
COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work.德国的《工作心理社会因素调查问卷第三版》:一种测量工作中社会心理因素的标准工具的验证
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Nov 16;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1.
8
Psychometric properties of a medium version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II) for southern Brazil.巴西南部版哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ II)简版的心理测量特性。
Work. 2019;62(2):175-184. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192853.
9
Assessing the psychosocial work environment in the health care setting: translation and psychometric testing of the French and Italian Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaires (COPSOQ) in a large sample of health professionals in Switzerland.评估医疗保健环境中的心理社会工作环境:在瑞士大量卫生专业人员中对法意版哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)的翻译和心理计量学测试。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 6;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07924-4.
10
The Norwegian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III): Initial validation study using a national sample of registered nurses.《哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ III)挪威版》:使用注册护士全国样本进行的初步验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289739. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
COPSOQ III in China: Preliminary Validation of an International Instrument to Measure Psychosocial Work Factors.中国的《工作心理社会因素问卷第三版》(COPSOQ III):一种测量心理社会工作因素的国际工具的初步验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 4;13(7):825. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070825.
2
Psychosocial Determinants of Occupational Health Through the Lenses of Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation.透过性别认同与性取向视角看职业健康的社会心理决定因素
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;15(2):234. doi: 10.3390/bs15020234.
3
The Norwegian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III): Initial validation study using a national sample of registered nurses.《哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ III)挪威版》:使用注册护士全国样本进行的初步验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289739. eCollection 2023.
4
Healthcare Services and Formal Caregiver's Psychosocial Risk Factors: An Observational Study.医疗保健服务与正式照顾者的心理社会风险因素:一项观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):5009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095009.

本文引用的文献

1
Lockdown-related factors associated with the worsening of cardiovascular risk and anxiety or depression during the COVID-19 pandemic.与2019冠状病毒病大流行期间心血管风险恶化以及焦虑或抑郁相关的封锁因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Dec 28;21:101300. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101300. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health?在家工作对身心健康影响的快速综述:我们如何优化健康?
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09875-z.
3
Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden.验证哥本哈根心理社会问卷第 III 版并为瑞典的心理社会风险管理制定基准。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 2;17(9):3179. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093179.
4
The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷第三版
Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
Measuring psychosocial factors and predicting work ability among cemetery workers.测量墓地工人的心理社会因素并预测其工作能力。
Work. 2020;65(1):111-119. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193063.
6
Monitoring Work Ability Index During a Two-Year Period Among Portuguese Municipality Workers.监测葡萄牙市政工作人员两年期间的工作能力指数。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 30;16(19):3674. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193674.
7
Psychosocial Work Factors, Job Stress and Strain at the Wheel: Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) in Professional Drivers.心理社会工作因素、驾驶时的工作压力与紧张感:哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)在职业驾驶员中的验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 2;10:1531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01531. eCollection 2019.
8
Psychometric properties of a medium version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II) for southern Brazil.巴西南部版哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ II)简版的心理测量特性。
Work. 2019;62(2):175-184. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192853.
9
A novel version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-3: Turkish validation study.哥本哈根心理社会问卷-3的新版本:土耳其语验证研究。
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2019;74(6):297-309. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2018.1538095. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
10
Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis.二因素多分测验项目反应理论分析导论。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Feb;60:41-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Dec 29.