Suppr超能文献

哥本哈根心理社会问卷II(COPSOQ II)葡萄牙语长版——一项效度研究。

The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study.

作者信息

Rosário Susel, Azevedo Luís F, Fonseca João A, Nienhaus Albert, Nübling Matthias, da Costa José Torres

机构信息

Doctoral Programme in Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.

CINTESIS - Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems and Information and Decision Sciences Department, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido da Costa, s/n 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017 Aug 9;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial risks are now widely recognised as one of the biggest challenges for occupational safety and health (OSH) and a major public health concern. The aim of this paper is to investigate the Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II), in order to analyse the psychometric properties of the instrument and to validate it.

METHODS

The Portuguese COPSOQ II was issued to a total of 745 Portuguese employees from both private and public organisations across several economic sectors at a baseline and then 2 weeks later. Methodological quality appraisal was based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations. An analysis of the psychometric properties of the long version of COPSOQ II (internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficient, floor and ceiling effects, response rate, missing values, mean and standard deviation, exploratory factor analysis) was performed to determine the validity and reliability of the instrument.

RESULTS

The COPSOQ II had a response rate of 60.6% (test) and a follow-up response rate of 59.5% (retest). In general, a Cronbach's alpha of the COPSOQ scales (test and retest) was above the conventional threshold of 0.70. The test-retest reliability estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed a higher reliability for most of the scales, above the conventional 0.7, except for eight scales. The proportion of the missing values was less than 1.3%, except for two scales. The average scores and standard deviations showed similar results to the original Danish study, except for eight scales. All of the scales had low floor and ceiling effects, with one exception Overall, the exploratory factor analysis presented good results in 27 scales assuming a reflective measurement model. The hypothesized factor structure under a reflective model was not supported in 14 scales and for some but not all of these scales the explanation may be a formative measurement model.

CONCLUSION

The Portuguese long version of COPSOQ II is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing psychosocial risks in the workplace. Although the results are good for most of the scales, there are those that should be evaluated in greater depth in future studies. This instrument may contribute to the promotion of a healthy working environment and workforce, providing clear benefits for companies and employees.

摘要

背景

社会心理风险如今被广泛认为是职业安全与健康(OSH)面临的最大挑战之一,也是一个主要的公共卫生问题。本文旨在对哥本哈根社会心理问卷II(COPSOQ II)的葡萄牙语长版本进行调查,以分析该工具的心理测量特性并对其进行验证。

方法

葡萄牙语版COPSOQ II被发放给来自多个经济部门的745名葡萄牙私营和公共组织员工,在基线时发放一次,两周后再发放一次。方法学质量评估基于基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)建议。对COPSOQ II长版本的心理测量特性(内部一致性、组内相关系数、地板效应和天花板效应、应答率、缺失值、均值和标准差、探索性因子分析)进行分析,以确定该工具的有效性和可靠性。

结果

COPSOQ II的应答率为60.6%(测试),随访应答率为59.5%(重测)。总体而言,COPSOQ量表(测试和重测)的Cronbach's alpha高于传统阈值0.70。通过组内相关系数(ICC)估计的重测信度显示,除了八个量表外,大多数量表的信度较高,高于传统的0.7。除了两个量表外,缺失值的比例小于1.3%。平均得分和标准差显示出与丹麦原始研究相似的结果,除了八个量表。所有量表的地板效应和天花板效应都较低,只有一个例外。总体而言,探索性因子分析在假设为反映性测量模型的27个量表中呈现出良好的结果。在14个量表中,反映性模型下的假设因子结构未得到支持,对于其中一些但并非全部量表,其解释可能是形成性测量模型。

结论

葡萄牙语长版本的COPSOQ II是评估工作场所社会心理风险的可靠且有效的工具。尽管大多数量表的结果良好,但仍有一些量表需要在未来的研究中进行更深入的评估。该工具可能有助于促进健康的工作环境和劳动力,为公司和员工带来明显的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977c/5550997/585010a160a0/12995_2017_170_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验