• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健服务与正式照顾者的心理社会风险因素:一项观察性研究。

Healthcare Services and Formal Caregiver's Psychosocial Risk Factors: An Observational Study.

机构信息

Research Centre on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):5009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095009.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19095009
PMID:35564402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9105897/
Abstract

The prevention and management of chronic disease primarily requires risk reduction measures, through strategic coordination across various government areas. Recognizing that health workers and the public health workforce are integral to building strong and resilient health, the present study analyses the relation between Psychosocial Risk Factors (PRFs, to which formal caregivers are exposed in the healthcare settings), and the work system related elements of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS 3.0) framework. An empirical study was carried out, involving 333 formal caregivers of healthcare services. A total of 31 PRFs were assessed (using the COPSOQ III), making it possible to find a relationship between the PRFs analyzed with three elements of the work system, namely Task (5 PRFs), Organizational factors (17 PRFs), and Individual (9 PRFs). The present work contributes not only in terms of outcomes that allow the development of mental illness prevention and mental health promotion actions for healthcare formal caregivers, but also in terms of the relevance that these factors can have on the quality of health services, as well as their users (patients), in line with SEIPS 3.0 model.

摘要

慢性病的预防和管理主要需要采取降低风险的措施,通过政府各领域之间的战略协调来实现。鉴于卫生工作者和公共卫生工作队伍是建立强大和有弹性卫生系统的组成部分,本研究分析了心理社会风险因素(PRFs)与与患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS 3.0)框架的工作系统相关要素之间的关系。进行了一项涉及 333 名医疗服务正式护理人员的实证研究。共评估了 31 个 PRFs(使用 COPSOQ III),从而可以发现分析的 PRFs 与工作系统的三个要素之间的关系,即任务(5 个 PRFs)、组织因素(17 个 PRFs)和个人(9 个 PRFs)。这项工作不仅在允许为医疗保健正式护理人员制定精神疾病预防和促进心理健康的行动方面取得了成果,而且在这些因素对卫生服务及其使用者(患者)的质量可能具有的相关性方面也取得了成果,符合 SEIPS 3.0 模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/94d696ac2393/ijerph-19-05009-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/a65869318c66/ijerph-19-05009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/f59eec4a2301/ijerph-19-05009-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/94d696ac2393/ijerph-19-05009-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/a65869318c66/ijerph-19-05009-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/f59eec4a2301/ijerph-19-05009-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92ed/9105897/94d696ac2393/ijerph-19-05009-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare Services and Formal Caregiver's Psychosocial Risk Factors: An Observational Study.医疗保健服务与正式照顾者的心理社会风险因素:一项观察性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):5009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095009.
2
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Depressive symptoms of Alzheimer caregivers are mainly due to personal rather than patient factors.阿尔茨海默病患者照料者的抑郁症状主要源于个人因素而非患者因素。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;13(6):358-67. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199806)13:6<358::aid-gps772>3.0.co;2-j.
4
Perceived quality of primary healthcare services and its association with institutional trust among caregivers of persons diagnosed with a severe mental illness in China.中国被诊断患有严重精神疾病者照顾者感知的初级医疗保健服务质量及其与机构信任的关系。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;28(3):394-408. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12687. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
PHARMAID study protocol: Randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of integrated pharmaceutical care at a psychosocial intervention on caregiver's burden in Alzheimer's disease or related diseases.PHARMAID研究方案:一项随机对照试验,旨在评估心理社会干预中综合药学服务对阿尔茨海默病或相关疾病照料者负担的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;53:137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
6
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
Psychosocial intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia reduces caregiver's burden: development and effect after 6 and 12 months.针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的心理社会干预可减轻照顾者负担:干预措施的制定及其在6个月和12个月后的效果
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):98-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00498.x.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
[Formal and informal support of patients with dementia at home: A mixed methods study within the Actifcare project].[家中痴呆症患者的正式与非正式照护:Actifcare项目中的一项混合方法研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Dec;139:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
Experiences of Family Caregivers of Individuals With Chronic Psychiatric Illness in Turkey: A Qualitative Study.土耳其慢性精神疾病患者家庭照顾者的经历:一项定性研究。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2020 Mar 1;58(3):38-46. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20191210-02. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The Portuguese Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: Preliminary Validation Studies of the Middle Version among Municipal and Healthcare Workers.《哥本哈根心理社会问卷葡萄牙语第三版:中间版本在市政和医疗保健工作者中的初步验证研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;19(3):1167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031167.
2
Impact of Psychological Aggression at the Workplace on Employees' Health: A Systematic Review of Personal Outcomes and Prevention Strategies.工作场所心理攻击对员工健康的影响:个人结果和预防策略的系统评价。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Jun;124(3):929-976. doi: 10.1177/0033294119875598. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Chronic health conditions and work-related stress in older adults participating in the Dutch workforce.
参与荷兰劳动力市场的老年人的慢性健康状况与工作相关压力
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Feb 14;17(4):499-508. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00554-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
A Systematic Literature Review on e-Mental Health Solutions to Assist Health Care Workers During COVID-19.电子心理健康解决方案在 COVID-19 期间协助医护人员的系统文献回顾
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Jun;27(6):594-602. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0287. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Job Stress, Burnout and Coping in Police Officers: Relationships and Psychometric Properties of the Organizational Police Stress Questionnaire.警察的工作压力、倦怠与应对方式:组织警察压力问卷的关系与心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186718.
6
Burnout and Stress Measurement in Police Officers: Literature Review and a Study With the Operational Police Stress Questionnaire.警察职业倦怠与压力测量:文献综述及运用警察工作压力问卷的研究
Front Psychol. 2020 May 7;11:587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00587. eCollection 2020.
7
Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden.验证哥本哈根心理社会问卷第 III 版并为瑞典的心理社会风险管理制定基准。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 2;17(9):3179. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093179.
8
SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety.SEIPS 3.0:以患者安全为中心的患者就医流程的人因工程设计。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.哥本哈根心理社会调查问卷第三版
Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Measuring psychosocial factors and predicting work ability among cemetery workers.测量墓地工人的心理社会因素并预测其工作能力。
Work. 2020;65(1):111-119. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193063.