Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Department of Child Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;63(11):1297-1307. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13569. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
Clinicians increasingly serve youths from societal/cultural backgrounds different from their own. This raises questions about how to interpret what such youths report. Rescorla et al. (2019, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 1107) found that much more variance in 72,493 parents' ratings of their offspring's mental health problems was accounted for by individual differences than by societal or cultural differences. Although parents' reports are essential for clinical assessment of their offspring, they reflect parents' perceptions of the offspring. Consequently, clinical assessment also requires self-reports from the offspring themselves. To test effects of individual differences, society, and culture on youths' self-ratings of their problems and strengths, we analyzed Youth Self-Report (YSR) scores for 39,849 11-17 year olds in 38 societies.
Indigenous researchers obtained YSR self-ratings from population samples of youths in 38 societies representing 10 culture cluster identified in the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavioral Effectiveness study. Hierarchical linear modeling of scores on 17 problem scales and one strengths scale estimated the percent of variance accounted for by individual differences (including measurement error), society, and culture cluster. ANOVAs tested age and gender effects.
Averaged across the 17 problem scales, individual differences accounted for 92.5% of variance, societal differences 6.0%, and cultural differences 1.5%. For strengths, individual differences accounted for 83.4% of variance, societal differences 10.1%, and cultural differences 6.5%. Age and gender had very small effects.
Like parents' ratings, youths' self-ratings of problems were affected much more by individual differences than societal/cultural differences. Most variance in self-rated strengths also reflected individual differences, but societal/cultural effects were larger than for problems, suggesting greater influence of social desirability. The clinical significance of individual differences in youths' self-reports should thus not be minimized by societal/cultural differences, which-while important-can be taken into account with appropriate norms, as can gender and age differences.
临床医生越来越多地为与自己的社会/文化背景不同的年轻人服务。这就提出了如何解释这些年轻人所报告的问题。Rescorla 等人(2019 年,《欧洲儿童与青少年精神病学》,28,1107)发现,父母对其子女心理健康问题的评分差异中,个体差异的解释程度要远远高于社会或文化差异。尽管父母的报告对于临床评估子女至关重要,但它们反映了父母对子女的看法。因此,临床评估还需要子女本人的自我报告。为了检验个体差异、社会和文化对年轻人自我评估问题和优势的影响,我们分析了来自 38 个社会的 39849 名 11-17 岁青少年的《青少年自我报告》(YSR)评分。
在全球领导力和组织行为有效性研究中确定的 10 个文化群中,当地研究人员从 38 个社会的人口样本中获得了青少年的 YSR 自我评分。对 17 个问题量表和一个优势量表的分数进行层次线性建模,以估计个体差异(包括测量误差)、社会和文化群所解释的方差百分比。方差分析测试了年龄和性别效应。
在 17 个问题量表的平均值上,个体差异解释了 92.5%的方差,社会差异解释了 6.0%,文化差异解释了 1.5%。对于优势,个体差异解释了 83.4%的方差,社会差异解释了 10.1%,文化差异解释了 6.5%。年龄和性别影响非常小。
与父母的评分一样,年轻人对问题的自我评分受到个体差异的影响要远远大于社会/文化差异。自我评定优势的大部分差异也反映了个体差异,但社会/文化的影响大于问题,这表明社会期望的影响更大。因此,年轻人自我报告中的个体差异的临床意义不应被社会/文化差异所低估,尽管这些差异很重要,但可以通过适当的规范来考虑,同时还可以考虑性别和年龄差异。