Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):213-219. doi: 10.2319/050121-345.1.
To compare efficacy of casein phosphopeptide (CPP)-amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) fluoride varnish and light-curable resin modified glass ionomer fluoride varnish (FV) in preventing white spot lesions and evaluating acid etching prior to CPP-ACPFV application on its efficacy.
Molars and premolars were transected and halves divided into four groups (n = 18/group): (1) resin-modified glass ionomer FV: etched and Clinpro-XT varnish (3M ESPE, Pymble, New South Wales, Australia) application; (2) CPP-ACPFV: MI varnish (GC America, Alsip, IL) application; (3) Etch+CPP-ACPFV: etched and MI varnish application; (4) Control: etched and no surface treatment. To simulate 12 weeks in an intraoral environment, samples were subjected to thermocycling, brushing, and pH cycling. Enamel surface microhardness was evaluated at baseline and after the simulated 12 weeks. Representative samples were also assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
At baseline there was no significant difference in microhardness among groups. After the simulated 12 weeks, all groups showed significant within-group differences (P < .001). Control showed the highest percentage loss of surface microhardness (89%), followed by CPP-ACPFV (58%), RMGIFV (51%), and Etch+CPP-ACPFV (24%). The control group had a significant decrease in microhardness compared to all experimental groups (P < .001). No difference was found between the RMGIFV and CPP-ACPFV varnish groups. The Etch+CPP-ACPFV group had significantly less decrease in microhardness compared to the RMGIFV (P < .001) and CPP-ACPFV groups (P < .001). With SEM, control samples showed signs of enamel surface damage, while experimental groups showed spherical particles on a relatively intact surface.
RMGIFV and CPP-ACPFV are effective in reducing enamel demineralization. Acid etching the enamel surface prior to CPP-ACPFV varnish application increased its efficacy.
比较酪蛋白磷酸肽(CPP)-无定形磷酸钙(ACP)氟化物涂料和光固化树脂改性玻璃离子氟化物涂料(FV)在预防白垩斑方面的疗效,并评估 CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料应用前酸蚀对其疗效的影响。
将磨牙和前磨牙横断,将一半分为四组(每组 18 个样本):(1)树脂改性玻璃离子 FV:酸蚀并用 Clinpro-XT 涂料(3M ESPE,新南威尔士州皮姆布勒)处理;(2)CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料:MI 涂料(GC America,伊利诺伊州艾尔西普)处理;(3)酸蚀+CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料:酸蚀并用 MI 涂料处理;(4)对照组:酸蚀但不进行表面处理。为了模拟口腔内 12 周的环境,样本进行了热循环、刷牙和 pH 循环。在基线和模拟 12 周后评估釉质表面显微硬度。还使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估了代表性样本。
基线时,各组之间的显微硬度无显著差异。经过模拟 12 周后,所有组内均显示出显著差异(P <.001)。对照组表面显微硬度的损失百分比最高(89%),其次是 CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料组(58%)、RMGIFV 组(51%)和酸蚀+CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料组(24%)。与所有实验组相比,对照组的显微硬度显著降低(P <.001)。RMGIFV 组和 CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料组之间无差异。与 RMGIFV 组和 CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料组相比,酸蚀+CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料组的显微硬度降低程度显著降低(P <.001)。用 SEM 观察,对照组样本显示釉质表面损伤的迹象,而实验组样本显示相对完整表面上的球形颗粒。
RMGIFV 和 CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料可有效减少釉质脱矿。CPP-ACP 氟化物涂料应用前酸蚀釉质表面可提高其疗效。