• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证香港使用修订版分娩经历问卷的有效性。

Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x
PMID:35168552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8845391/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0) and assess the childbirth experiences of Chinese women.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Hong Kong from July 2020 to February 2021. In total, 975 mothers, who could read traditional Chinese and gave birth in 2020 or 2021, were included in the analysis. Data were fitted into the model proposed by the original developers using the confirmatory factor analysis. The data were then randomly split into training and validation sets for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Childbirth experiences were assessed. Factor structure, internal construct validity, internal consistency, and known-group validity were assessed.

RESULTS

The originally proposed CEQ2.0 model showed a poor fit. An exploratory factor analysis identified a revised four-factor model (CEQ2.0-R) on a randomly split sample, which showed a satisfactory fit (CFI=0.912; TLI=0.884; SRMR=.053; RMSEA=0.072) on the other split sample. The revised scale comprised 13 items and four domains: (1)"Own capacity" (6 items), (2) "General support" (3 items), (3) "Perceived safety" (2 items), and (4) "Professional support" (2 items). CEQ2.0-R showed high internal construct validity and reliability. It can differentiate between participants with different characteristics, including parity, oxytocin augmentation, and companionship during labour. The childbirth experiences of the participants were merely positive, and participants reported that more support from midwives is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

CEQ2.0-R can adequately describe the childbirth experiences of women in Hong Kong. The questionnaire is easy to be administer and can be used to assess several domains of the childbirth experiences. It may be useful to evaluate the aspects of support needed during childbirth.

摘要

目的

评估中文版生育经历问卷(CEQ 2.0)的心理计量特性,并评估中国女性的生育经历。

方法

本研究于 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 2 月在香港进行了一项横断面调查。共纳入 975 名能读懂繁体中文且于 2020 年或 2021 年分娩的母亲。采用原开发者提出的模型对数据进行拟合,通过探索性和验证性因子分析对数据进行随机拆分,建立训练集和验证集。评估生育经历,评估因子结构、内部结构效度、内部一致性和已知组有效性。

结果

最初提出的 CEQ2.0 模型拟合效果较差。探索性因子分析在随机拆分样本上确定了一个修订的四因子模型(CEQ2.0-R),在另一部分拆分样本上显示出了较好的拟合(CFI=0.912;TLI=0.884;SRMR=0.053;RMSEA=0.072)。修订后的量表包括 13 个项目和四个领域:(1)“自身能力”(6 个项目);(2)“一般支持”(3 个项目);(3)“感知安全”(2 个项目);(4)“专业支持”(2 个项目)。CEQ2.0-R 具有较高的内部结构效度和信度。它可以区分具有不同特征的参与者,包括产次、催产素增强和分娩陪伴。参与者的生育经历仅为积极,报告需要更多来自助产士的支持。

结论

CEQ2.0-R 可充分描述香港女性的生育经历。该问卷易于管理,可用于评估生育经历的多个领域。它可能有助于评估分娩期间所需支持的各个方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f0/8845391/4f034d8f2e98/12884_2022_4456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f0/8845391/4f034d8f2e98/12884_2022_4456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f0/8845391/4f034d8f2e98/12884_2022_4456_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong.验证香港使用修订版分娩经历问卷的有效性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x.
2
Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.测量女性的决策体验和助产支持方面:修订后的《分娩体验问卷》的验证性因素分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
3
Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study.《中国生育体验问卷(CEQ)的适应性研究:一项多地点横断面研究》。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373. eCollection 2019.
4
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.评估荷兰女性的分娩经历:自主决策量表、尊重指数和生育体验问卷 2.0 的测量方法的调整和心理计量学评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
5
The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment.《分娩体验问卷》西班牙语版(CEQ-E):信度与效度评估
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
6
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2 - Icelandic translation and validation.产妇分娩经历问卷 2-冰岛语翻译与验证。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023 Sep;37:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100882. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
7
Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.总体分娩体验:它意味着什么?总体分娩体验评分与产时经历量表 2 的比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5.
8
Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument.分娩体验问卷(CEQ):多维工具的开发和评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
9
Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language.斯里兰卡环境下的分娩体验问卷(CEQ):翻译、文化适应及僧伽罗语版本的验证。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Nov 13;13(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z.
10
Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0.验证生育经历问卷 2.0 的伊朗版本。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.《分娩体验问卷2.0中文版的跨文化适应与心理测量学评估》
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 20;16:1488966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1488966. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric properties of the questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience in a Chinese sample of postpartum women.用于评估中国产后女性样本分娩体验问卷的心理测量学特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 20;25(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07659-0.
3
The effect of participation education on maternal role adaptation in mothers with premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

本文引用的文献

1
International survey on fear and childbirth experience in pregnancy and the postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic: study protocol.国际调查:COVID-19 大流行期间妊娠和产后恐惧和分娩体验。研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 3;11(8):e050132. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050132.
2
Effect of COVID-19 on delivery plans and postnatal depression scores of pregnant women.COVID-19 对孕妇分娩计划和产后抑郁评分的影响。
Hong Kong Med J. 2021 Apr;27(2):113-117. doi: 10.12809/hkmj208774. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Does prolonged labor affect the birth experience and subsequent wish for cesarean section among first-time mothers? A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a survey from Norway.
参与式教育对新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿母亲角色适应的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 5;13:196. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1462_23. eCollection 2024.
4
Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context.文化调适、验证及评估西班牙文版生育经验问卷 2.0 的心理计量特性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7.
5
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 in Karnataka state, India.印度卡纳塔克邦的《产时经历问卷 2》的文化调适和心理测量学评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0291591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291591. eCollection 2023.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Person-Centered Maternity Care Scale.《以人为主的孕产照顾量表中文版的跨文化调适与心理计量特性》。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05959-x.
7
Predictors of maternal role adaptation in Iranian women: a cross-sectional study.伊朗妇女母亲角色适应的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04702-2.
长时间分娩是否会影响初产妇的分娩体验和随后对剖宫产的愿望?来自挪威的一项调查的定量和定性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03196-0.
4
Childbirth experience in women participating in a continuity of midwifery care project.参与助产士连续照护项目的女性的分娩体验。
Women Birth. 2021 May;34(3):e255-e261. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)-Validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour.《分娩体验问卷》(CEQ)——在分娩时接受催产素刺激的丹麦语新妈妈人群中应用的验证。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233122. eCollection 2020.
6
Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.测量女性的决策体验和助产支持方面:修订后的《分娩体验问卷》的验证性因素分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
7
Women's childbirth experience emphasizing own capacity and safety: A cross-sectional Rwandan study.强调自身能力和安全的女性分娩体验:一项卢旺达的横断面研究。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):e146-e152. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom.分娩体验问卷2:验证其在英国的使用情况。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0.验证生育经历问卷 2.0 的伊朗版本。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y.
10
Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite cross-sectional study.《中国生育体验问卷(CEQ)的适应性研究:一项多地点横断面研究》。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373. eCollection 2019.