• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

总体分娩体验:它意味着什么?总体分娩体验评分与产时经历量表 2 的比较。

Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.

Centre for Clinical Research Dalarna, Nissers Väg 3, 79182, Falun, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5
PMID:36918812
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10012290/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In clinical settings and research studies, childbirth experience is often measured using a single-item question about overall experience. Little is known about what women include in this rating, which complicates the design of adequate follow-up, as well as the interpretation of research findings based on ratings of overall childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to examine which known dimensions of childbirth experience women include in the rating on a single-item measure.

METHODS

Ratings of overall childbirth experience on a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 2953 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labour at two Swedish hospitals were evaluated against the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2), completed on one of the first days postpartum. The CEQ2 measures four childbirth experience domains: own capacity, perceived safety, professional support and participation. Internal consistency for CEQ2 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha. NRS ratings were explored in relation to CEQ2 using empirical cumulative distribution function graphs, where childbirth experience was defined as negative (NRS ratings 1-4), mixed (NRS ratings 5-6) or positive (NRS ratings 7-10). A multiple linear regression analysis, presented as beta coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was also performed to explore the relationship between the four domains of the CEQ2 and overall childbirth experience.

RESULTS

The prevalence of negative childbirth experience was 6.3%. All CEQ2-subscales reached high or acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78; 0.81; 0.69 and 0.66, respectively). Regardless of overall childbirth experience, the majority of respondents scored high on the CEQ2 subscale representing professional support. Overall childbirth experience was mainly explained by perceived safety (B = 1.60, CI 1.48-1.73), followed by own capacity (B = 0.65, CI 0.53-0.77) and participation (B = 0.43, CI 0.29-0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, overall childbirth experience rated by a single-item measurement appears to mainly capture experiences of perceived safety, and to a lesser extent own capacity and participation, but appears not to reflect professional support. CEQ2 shows good psychometric properties for use shortly after childbirth, and among women with induced onset of labour, which increases the usability of the instrument.

摘要

背景

在临床环境和研究中,分娩体验通常使用一个关于整体体验的单项问题进行衡量。关于女性在这个评分中包含哪些内容,知之甚少,这使得后续工作的设计变得复杂,也使得基于整体分娩体验评分的研究结果的解释变得复杂。本研究旨在探讨女性在单项测量中对分娩体验的整体评分中包含哪些已知维度。

方法

对来自瑞典两家医院的 2953 名自发性或诱导性分娩的女性在 10 点数字评分量表(NRS)上对分娩体验的整体评分进行评估,并与产后第一天完成的经过验证的分娩体验问卷 2(CEQ2)进行对比。CEQ2 衡量四个分娩体验领域:自身能力、感知安全性、专业支持和参与。通过计算克朗巴赫的 alpha 来评估 CEQ2 的内部一致性。使用经验累积分布函数图探索 NRS 评分与 CEQ2 的关系,其中分娩体验定义为负面(NRS 评分 1-4)、混合(NRS 评分 5-6)或正面(NRS 评分 7-10)。还进行了多元线性回归分析,以β系数(B)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示,以探讨 CEQ2 的四个领域与整体分娩体验之间的关系。

结果

负面分娩体验的患病率为 6.3%。所有 CEQ2 子量表的信度均较高或可接受(克朗巴赫的 alpha 分别为 0.78、0.81、0.69 和 0.66)。无论整体分娩体验如何,大多数受访者在代表专业支持的 CEQ2 子量表上的得分都很高。整体分娩体验主要由感知安全性(B=1.60,CI 1.48-1.73)决定,其次是自身能力(B=0.65,CI 0.53-0.77)和参与度(B=0.43,CI 0.29-0.56)。

结论

总之,单项测量评定的整体分娩体验似乎主要反映感知安全性体验,在较小程度上反映自身能力和参与度,但似乎不反映专业支持。CEQ2 在产后不久即可用于测量,并且在诱导性分娩的女性中具有良好的心理测量学特性,这增加了该工具的可用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c4/10012436/c8df8660a70d/12884_2023_5498_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c4/10012436/7b3c1823e22f/12884_2023_5498_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c4/10012436/c8df8660a70d/12884_2023_5498_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c4/10012436/7b3c1823e22f/12884_2023_5498_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c4/10012436/c8df8660a70d/12884_2023_5498_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.总体分娩体验:它意味着什么?总体分娩体验评分与产时经历量表 2 的比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05498-5.
2
Dosage of oxytocin for augmentation of labor and women's childbirth experiences: A randomized controlled trial.缩宫素在引产和妇女分娩体验中的剂量:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):971-978. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14042. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Childbirth experience questionnaire 2 - Icelandic translation and validation.产妇分娩经历问卷 2-冰岛语翻译与验证。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023 Sep;37:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100882. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
4
Women's childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.瑞典过期引产研究(SWEPIS)中女性的分娩经历:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 7;11(4):e042340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042340.
5
Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.测量女性的决策体验和助产支持方面:修订后的《分娩体验问卷》的验证性因素分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
6
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0.评估荷兰女性的分娩经历:自主决策量表、尊重指数和生育体验问卷 2.0 的测量方法的调整和心理计量学评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 18;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0.
7
The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment.《分娩体验问卷》西班牙语版(CEQ-E):信度与效度评估
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z.
8
Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial.分娩室设计对产妇分娩体验的影响:来自 Room4Birth 随机试验的结果。
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):200-218. doi: 10.1177/19375867221124232. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong.验证香港使用修订版分娩经历问卷的有效性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x.
10
Women's childbirth experience emphasizing own capacity and safety: A cross-sectional Rwandan study.强调自身能力和安全的女性分娩体验:一项卢旺达的横断面研究。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):e146-e152. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of childbirth experience over time-A prospective cohort study.不同时期分娩体验的评估——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Sep;104(9):1766-1773. doi: 10.1111/aogs.70010. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Maternal satisfaction and birth experiences after elective induction vs. spontaneous onset in late-term pregnancy: a register-based study.晚期妊娠选择性引产与自然发动后的产妇满意度及分娩体验:一项基于登记的研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07818-3.
3
Prevalence of negative birth experience: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial.分娩室设计对产妇分娩体验的影响:来自 Room4Birth 随机试验的结果。
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):200-218. doi: 10.1177/19375867221124232. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Negative childbirth experience - what matters most? a register-based study of risk factors in three time periods during pregnancy.负面的分娩体验——最重要的是什么?一项基于登记的研究,探讨了妊娠三个时期的风险因素。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Dec;34:100779. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100779. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
负面分娩经历的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07269-w.
4
Rating of overall childbirth experience: A qualitative study of a quantitative measurement.整体分娩体验评分:一项关于定量测量的定性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):658-665. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15049. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
5
Obstetric interventions' effects on the birthing experience.产科干预措施对分娩体验的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5.
6
Childbirth experiences of women with a history of physical, sexual, and child abuse: a cross-sectional study of 2,575 Russian women.有身体、性和儿童虐待史的女性的分娩经历:对 2575 名俄罗斯女性的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06369-3.
比较球囊导管或口服米索前列醇促宫颈成熟引产的初产妇分娩体验-使用经过验证的分娩体验问卷(CEQ)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)的前瞻性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Oct;101(10):1153-1162. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14433. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
Maternal childbirth experience and time in labor: a population-based cohort study.产妇分娩体验和产程时间:基于人群的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14711-y.
5
Maternal childbirth experience and time of delivery: a retrospective 7-year cohort study of 105 847 parturients in Finland.产妇分娩体验与分娩时间:芬兰 105847 例产妇回顾性 7 年队列研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046433. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046433.
6
'Watchful attendance' during labour and birth.分娩过程中的“密切观察”。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Jun;28:100617. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100617. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
The childbirth experience: A systematic review of predictors and outcomes.分娩体验:预测因素和结果的系统评价。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):407-416. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.021. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Maternal childbirth experience in induced and spontaneous labour measured in a visual analog scale and the factors influencing it; a two-year cohort study.产妇在诱导分娩和自然分娩中的分娩体验,以视觉模拟量表衡量,以及影响分娩体验的因素:一项为期两年的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 21;20(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03106-4.
9
Measuring women's experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: a confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire.测量女性的决策体验和助产支持方面:修订后的《分娩体验问卷》的验证性因素分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
10
A meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women's experience of midwifery care.女性体验助产护理的定性研究的元民族志综合分析。
Nurs Health Sci. 2020 Jun;22(2):171-183. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12714. Epub 2020 Apr 15.