Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Feb 16;15(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00520-z.
Previous research shows kinematic and kinetic coupling between the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and midtarsal joints during gait. Studying the effects of MTP position as well as foot structure on this coupling may help determine to what extent foot coupling during dynamic and active movement is due to the windlass mechanism. This study's purpose was to investigate the kinematic and kinetic foot coupling during controlled passive, active, and dynamic movements.
After arch height and flexibility were measured, participants performed four conditions: Seated Passive MTP Extension, Seated Active MTP Extension, Standing Passive MTP Extension, and Standing Active MTP Extension. Next, participants performed three heel raise conditions that manipulated the starting position of the MTP joint: Neutral, Toe Extension, and Toe Flexion. A multisegment foot model was created in Visual 3D and used to calculate ankle, midtarsal, and MTP joint kinematics and kinetics.
Kinematic coupling (ratio of midtarsal to MTP angular displacement) was approximately six times greater in Neutral heel raises compared to Seated Passive MTP Extension, suggesting that the windlass only plays a small kinematic role in dynamic tasks. As the starting position of the MTP joint became increasingly extended during heel raises, the amount of negative work at the MTP joint and positive work at the midtarsal joint increased proportionally, while distal-to-hindfoot work remained unchanged. Correlations suggest that there is not a strong relationship between static arch height/flexibility and kinematic foot coupling.
Our results show that there is kinematic and kinetic coupling within the distal foot, but this coupling is attributed only in small measure to the windlass mechanism. Additional sources of coupling include foot muscles and elastic energy storage and return within ligaments and tendons. Furthermore, our results suggest that the plantar aponeurosis does not function as a rigid cable but likely has extensibility that affects the effectiveness of the windlass mechanism. Arch structure did not affect foot coupling, suggesting that static arch height or arch flexibility alone may not be adequate predictors of dynamic foot function.
先前的研究表明,在步态中,跖趾(MTP)和中跗关节之间存在运动学和动力学的耦合。研究 MTP 位置以及足部结构对这种耦合的影响,可以帮助确定在动态和主动运动中,足部耦合在多大程度上归因于辘轳机制。本研究旨在探讨在受控被动、主动和动态运动中,足部的运动学和动力学耦合。
在测量足弓高度和灵活性后,参与者进行了四种条件下的测试:坐姿被动 MTP 伸展、坐姿主动 MTP 伸展、站立被动 MTP 伸展和站立主动 MTP 伸展。然后,参与者进行了三种跟腱抬高条件的测试,这些条件改变了 MTP 关节的起始位置:中立、趾伸和趾屈。在 Visual 3D 中创建了一个多关节足部模型,用于计算踝关节、中跗关节和 MTP 关节的运动学和动力学。
在中立跟腱抬高条件下,中跗关节和 MTP 关节的角位移比在坐姿被动 MTP 伸展条件下大约六倍,这表明辘轳机制在动态任务中仅发挥很小的运动学作用。随着 MTP 关节的起始位置在跟腱抬高过程中逐渐伸展,MTP 关节的负功和中跗关节的正功成比例增加,而远-后足的功保持不变。相关性表明,静态足弓高度/灵活性与运动学足部耦合之间没有很强的关系。
我们的结果表明,远侧足部存在运动学和动力学的耦合,但这种耦合仅归因于辘轳机制的一小部分。其他耦合源包括足部肌肉和弹性储能以及韧带和肌腱中的弹性返回。此外,我们的结果表明,足底筋膜不是作为刚性索发挥作用,而是可能具有伸展性,这会影响辘轳机制的有效性。足弓结构不影响足部耦合,这表明静态足弓高度或足弓灵活性本身可能不是动态足部功能的充分预测指标。