Suppr超能文献

复发性流产:妊娠产物中染色体异常减少?一项荟萃分析。

Recurrent pregnancy loss: fewer chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception? a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related To Diseases, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Mar;39(3):559-572. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02414-2. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities detected in products of conception (POCs) between recurrent pregnancy loss and sporadic pregnancy loss.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 31, 2020. Relevant studies analysing the association between the number of pregnancy losses and the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities were included. Independent data extraction was conducted and study quality was assessed. Meta-analyses were carried out to calculate odds ratios by using fixed- or random-effects models according to statistical homogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 8320 POCs in 19 studies were identified for the meta-analyses. The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in sporadic pregnancy loss was significantly higher than that in recurrent pregnancy loss. In subgroup analyses, the following studies reported a high incidence of abnormal outcomes of sporadic pregnancy loss: studies with ≥ 300 samples, studies published before 2014, studies conducted in European and American countries, and studies with analyses using conventional karyotype techniques. Moreover, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in women with two pregnancy losses was significantly higher than that in women with three or more pregnancy losses. However, there was no difference in the distribution of abnormal types between sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss or between two and three or more pregnancy losses.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities detected in POCs was lower in recurrent pregnancy loss than in sporadic pregnancy loss, and decreased with an increasing number of pregnancy losses.

摘要

目的

比较复发性妊娠丢失和偶发性妊娠丢失的妊娠产物(POC)中染色体异常的检出率。

方法

系统检索 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。纳入分析妊娠丢失次数与染色体异常发生率之间关联的相关研究。独立进行数据提取并评估研究质量。采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,根据统计学同质性计算比值比。

结果

共纳入 19 项研究的 8320 例 POC 进行荟萃分析。偶发性妊娠丢失中染色体异常的发生率明显高于复发性妊娠丢失。亚组分析显示,以下研究报道了偶发性妊娠丢失异常结局的发生率较高:样本量≥300 例的研究、发表于 2014 年以前的研究、在欧美国家进行的研究以及采用常规核型技术进行分析的研究。此外,两次妊娠丢失的女性中染色体异常的发生率明显高于三次或更多次妊娠丢失的女性。但是,偶发性妊娠丢失和复发性妊娠丢失之间以及两次和三次或更多次妊娠丢失之间异常类型的分布无差异。

结论

复发性妊娠丢失的 POC 中染色体异常的检出率低于偶发性妊娠丢失,且随着妊娠丢失次数的增加而降低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Pregnancy Losses: A Study of 900 Samples.早期妊娠丢失中的染色体异常:900例样本的研究
Balkan J Med Genet. 2024 Mar 12;26(2):11-20. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2023-0014. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrent pregnancy loss.复发性流产
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Dec 10;6(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00228-z.
4
Cytogenetic testing of pregnancy loss tissue: a meta-analysis.妊娠丢失组织细胞遗传学检测:一项荟萃分析。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):867-879. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
9
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会指南:复发性流产
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Apr 6;2018(2):hoy004. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy004. eCollection 2018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验