• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流管放置的预测因素

Predictive Factors for Drain Placement After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Calini Giacomo, Brollo Pier Paolo, Quattrin Rosanna, Bresadola Vittorio

机构信息

Department of Medicine, General Surgery Department and Simulation Center, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Department of Organization of Hospital Services, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Feb 2;8:786158. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.786158. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.786158
PMID:35187046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8847274/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Currently, surgical drainage during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still placed in selected patients. Evidence of the non-beneficial effect of the surgical drain comes from studies with a heterogeneous population. This preliminary study aims to identify any clinical, demographic, or intraoperative predictive factors for a surgical drain placement during LC as the first step to identify population for a prospective randomized study.

METHOD

The study was conducted in a single referral center and academic hospital between 2014 and 2018. Patients who underwent unconverted LC were divided into two groups: Group A (drain) and Group B (no drain). We explored baseline, preoperative, intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 409 patients who underwent LC: 90 (22%) patients were in Group A (drain). Age >64 years, male sex, cholecystitis, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1, experienced surgeon, intraoperative technical difficulties, need for an additional trocar, operative time >60 min, and estimated blood loss >10 ml were predictive factors at univariate analysis. While at multivariate analysis, cholecystitis (odds ratio [OR]: 2.8, 95% :1.5-5.1; < 0.001), CCI ≥ 1 (:1.9, 95% :1.0-3.5; = 0.05), intraoperative technical difficulties (: 3.6, 95% :1.8-6.2; < 0.001), need of an additional trocar (: 2.5, 95% : 1.4-4.4; < 0.005), and estimated blood loss >10 ml (: 3.0, 95% :1.7-5.3; < 0.0001) were predictive factors for a surgical drain placement during LC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified predictive factors that currently drive the surgeons to a surgical drain placement after LC. Randomized prospective studies are needed to define the use of drain placement in these selected patients.

摘要

目的

目前,在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)期间仍会对部分患者进行手术引流。手术引流无有益效果的证据来自针对异质性人群的研究。这项初步研究旨在确定LC期间进行手术引流的任何临床、人口统计学或术中预测因素,作为确定前瞻性随机研究人群的第一步。

方法

该研究于2014年至2018年在一家单一的转诊中心和学术医院进行。接受未中转LC的患者被分为两组:A组(引流)和B组(未引流)。我们探究了基线、术前、术中特征及术后结果。

结果

在409例行LC的患者中,90例(22%)患者属于A组(引流)。单因素分析时,年龄>64岁、男性、胆囊炎、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)≥1、经验丰富的外科医生、术中技术困难、需要额外的套管针、手术时间>60分钟以及估计失血量>10毫升是预测因素。而多因素分析时,胆囊炎(比值比[OR]:2.8,95%可信区间:1.5 - 5.1;P<0.001)、CCI≥1(OR:1.9,95%可信区间:1.0 - 3.5;P = 0.05)、术中技术困难(OR:3.6,95%可信区间:1.8 - 6.2;P<0.001)、需要额外的套管针(OR:2.5,95%可信区间:1.4 - 4.4;P<0.005)以及估计失血量>10毫升(OR:3.0,95%可信区间:1.7 - 5.3;P<0.0001)是LC期间进行手术引流的预测因素。

结论

本研究确定了目前促使外科医生在LC后进行手术引流的预测因素。需要进行随机前瞻性研究来确定在这些选定患者中引流放置的使用情况。

相似文献

1
Predictive Factors for Drain Placement After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流管放置的预测因素
Front Surg. 2022 Feb 2;8:786158. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.786158. eCollection 2021.
2
Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后预防性引流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00648-x. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
3
Optimal drain management following complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity-matched comparative study.急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的最佳引流管理:一项倾向匹配的比较研究。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):63-72. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.63.
4
Treatment strategies of drain after complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流的治疗策略
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):51-52. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.51.
5
Routine drain or no drain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术后常规放置引流管与否
Surgeon. 2021 Jun;19(3):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
6
Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.急性胆囊炎胆囊切除术后引流与非引流的回顾性研究
J Biomed Res. 2014 May;28(3):240-5. doi: 10.7555/JBR.28.20130095. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
7
Is routine drain insertion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beneficial? A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后常规放置引流管是否有益?一项多中心、前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Jul;22(7):551-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.244. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
8
Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单纯性腹腔镜胆囊切除术中常规腹腔引流与不进行腹腔引流的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD006004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006004.pub4.
9
Risk factors for difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in grade II acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo guidelines 2013.根据《2013东京指南》探讨Ⅱ级急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难的危险因素。
BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0319-6.
10
A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.一项基于人群的队列研究,比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb;97(2):334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05466.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review on the Role of Surgical Drains in Vascular Surgery.关于外科引流管在血管外科中作用的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 May 12;17(5):e83941. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83941. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Robotic-Assisted Cholecystectomy in Acute Care Surgery.急性护理手术中腹腔镜与机器人辅助胆囊切除术的临床结果
JAMA Surg. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1291.
3
Learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a risk-adjusted cumulative summation (RA-CUSUM) analysis of six general surgery residents.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的学习曲线:六位普通外科住院医师的风险调整累积和(RA-CUSUM)分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):8133-8143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10345-x. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超高龄患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性及预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Dec;119(6):349-356. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2019.1658356. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
2
Review of the Tokyo Guidelines 2018: Antimicrobial Therapy for Acute Cholangitis and Cholecystitis.《2018年东京指南:急性胆管炎和胆囊炎的抗菌治疗》述评
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):873-874. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2169.
3
Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后预防性引流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00648-x. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较:一项最新的随机对照试验荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4728-4741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6400-0. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Nondrainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis Does Not Increase the Postoperative Morbidity.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎后不引流并不增加术后并发症。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 2;2018:8436749. doi: 10.1155/2018/8436749. eCollection 2018.
6
Effect of socioeconomic inequalities on cholecystectomy outcomes: a 10-year population-based analysis.社会经济不平等对胆囊切除术结果的影响:一项基于人群的 10 年分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 13;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0739-7.
7
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的手术治疗:急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全步骤(附有视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.517. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
8
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎管理流程图。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的诊断标准与严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.515. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎患者胆囊引流的管理策略(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):87-95. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.504. Epub 2017 Nov 21.