Godebo Ashebir T, Wee Naomi Marie J, Yost Christopher K, Walley Fran L, Germida James J
Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Feb 2;8:777042. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.777042. eCollection 2021.
The increasing incidence and prevalence of the pathogen in various pulse-growing regions worldwide necessitates the development of effective management strategies, including biological control agents. Numerous labs have undertaken research examining biological control methods to evaluate aphanomyces root rot suppression in multistep processes that include isolation of inhibitory organisms, lab assays, growth chamber assays, and field trials. Given the emergence of various biocontrol agents and the need to mitigate aphanomyces yield losses, we have undertaken a meta-analysis approach to analyze the effectiveness of biocontrol agents in relation to application method, biocontrol agent richness, biocontrol agent type, the type of study, and reporting system-oriented moderator variables. An effect size, calculated as a natural log response ratio, resulted in a summary weighted mean of -0.411, suggesting the overall effectiveness of biocontrol agents ( < .001). Aphanomyces root rot suppression using biological treatments showed significant heterogeneity for all moderator variables, confirming that the studies do not share a common effect size and the use of a random effect model was appropriate. Across studies, meta-analyses revealed that soil amendments, biocontrol agent application as a seed coating and suspension, bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents, mixed applications, growth chamber and field studies, and qualitative and quantitative reporting systems were all associated with significantly positive outcomes for aphanomyces root rot suppression. Our findings suggest that there is potential promise for biological control of aphanomyces root rot, and more field trials need to be conducted to demonstrate the efficacy level observed under growth chamber conditions. Moreover, we identified a lack of detailed understanding of the mechanism(s) of biological control of aphanomyces root rot as a research priority.
该病原菌在全球各豆类种植区的发病率和流行率不断上升,因此有必要制定有效的管理策略,包括使用生物防治剂。许多实验室已开展研究,通过多步骤流程来检验生物防治方法,以评估对瓜果腐霉菌根腐病的抑制效果,这些步骤包括分离抑制性生物、实验室测定、生长室测定和田间试验。鉴于各种生物防治剂的出现以及减轻瓜果腐霉菌造成的产量损失的需求,我们采用了荟萃分析方法,来分析生物防治剂在应用方法、生物防治剂丰富度、生物防治剂类型、研究类型以及面向报告系统的调节变量方面的有效性。以自然对数响应比计算的效应量得出的汇总加权平均值为-0.411,表明生物防治剂总体有效(<0.001)。使用生物处理抑制瓜果腐霉菌根腐病在所有调节变量上均显示出显著的异质性,这证实了各项研究的效应量并不相同,采用随机效应模型是合适的。在各项研究中,荟萃分析表明,土壤改良、作为种衣剂和悬浮液的生物防治剂应用、细菌和真菌生物防治剂、混合应用、生长室和田间研究以及定性和定量报告系统,均与抑制瓜果腐霉菌根腐病的显著积极结果相关。我们的研究结果表明,对瓜果腐霉菌根腐病进行生物防治具有潜在前景,需要开展更多田间试验来证明在生长室条件下观察到的 efficacy 水平。此外,我们确定将缺乏对瓜果腐霉菌根腐病生物防治机制的详细了解作为一个研究重点。