Kemp Mackenzie, Rising Kristin L, Laynor Gregory, Miao Jessica, Worster Brooke, Chang Anna Marie, Monick Andrew J, Guth Amanda, Esteves Camacho Tracy, McIntosh Kiana, Amadio Grace, Shughart Lindsey, Hsiao TingAnn, Leader Amy E
Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States.
JAMIA Open. 2025 Mar 19;8(2):ooaf019. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf019. eCollection 2025 Apr.
We conducted a scoping review to identify barriers to telehealth use and uptake from the perspective of patient, provider, and system that were documented in the literature. In addition to identifying and categorizing the barriers, we aimed to assess how barriers differed for studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as how barriers differed between the United States vs internationally based studies.
Comprehensive searches of the PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus databases conducted on December 29, 2021 yielded 17 887 results, with 11 221 potentially eligible documents after duplicates were removed. The team conducted an initial title and abstract review, followed by full text review. Data from the included sources were extracted and summarized into primary themes.
We identified 395 articles specifically related to barriers of telehealth use. The top 5 barriers, in order of frequency, were: lack of skills or ability (55%), lack of interest (49%), lack of access to technology (45%), limitations of technology infrastructure (45%), and lack of quality of care (42%). Roughly one-third (39%) of studies were related to the COVID-19 pandemic and 54% were US-based studies. The rank order of barriers between COVID-19 vs non-COVID-19 studies and US vs non-US studies was the same; however, patients in the United States and those using telehealth during COVID-19 were more likely to cite barriers related to the lack of access to technology (COVID = 56% vs 38%; United States = 51% vs 38%).
Interventions to address barriers need to consider the unique needs of specific populations and the ways in which different barriers may intersect.
This review found that barriers to telehealth uptake and use are multilayered and occur at several levels (individual, structural, technological).
我们进行了一项范围综述,以从患者、提供者和系统的角度识别文献中记录的远程医疗使用和采用的障碍。除了识别和分类这些障碍外,我们还旨在评估在COVID-19大流行期间进行的研究中障碍有何不同,以及美国与国际研究之间障碍有何不同。
2021年12月29日对PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL和Scopus数据库进行全面检索,得到17887条结果,去除重复项后有11221份潜在符合条件的文献。研究团队先进行了初步的标题和摘要审查,然后进行全文审查。从纳入的来源中提取数据并总结为主要主题。
我们识别出395篇与远程医疗使用障碍具体相关的文章。按出现频率排序,前5大障碍依次为:缺乏技能或能力(55%)、缺乏兴趣(49%)、无法获得技术(45%)、技术基础设施限制(45%)以及缺乏护理质量(42%)。大约三分之一(39%)的研究与COVID-19大流行相关,54%是基于美国的研究。COVID-19研究与非COVID-19研究以及美国研究与非美国研究之间障碍的排名顺序相同;然而,美国的患者以及在COVID-19期间使用远程医疗的患者更有可能提及与无法获得技术相关的障碍(COVID期间为56%对38%;美国为51%对38%)。
解决障碍的干预措施需要考虑特定人群的独特需求以及不同障碍可能相互交叉的方式。
本综述发现,远程医疗采用和使用的障碍是多层次的,发生在多个层面(个人、结构、技术)。