University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Resuscitation. 2022 May;174:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
Patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest who have severe neurological or functional disability at discharge require high-intensity long-term support. However, few data describe the long-term survival and health-care utilization for these patients.
We identified a cohort of cardiac arrest survivors ≥ 18 years of age, treated at a single center in Western Pennsylvania from January 2010 to December 2019, with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 5 at hospital discharge. We recorded demographics, cardiac arrest characteristics, and neurological exam at hospital discharge. We characterized long term survival and mortality through December 31, 2020 through National Death Index query. We described survival time overall and in subgroups using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests.We linked cases with administrative data to determine 30, 90 day, and one-year hospital readmission rate. For subjects unable to follow commands at discharge, we reviewed records from index hospitalization to the present to describe improvement in neurological status and return home.
We screened 2,687 patients of which 975 survived to discharge. We identified 190 subjects with mRS of 5 at hospital discharge who were sent to non-hospice settings. Of these, 43 (23%) did not follow commands at discharge. One-year mortality was 38% (n = 71) with a median survival time of 4.2 years (IQR 0.3-10.9). Duration of survival was shorter in older subjects but did not differ based on, sex, or ability to follow commands at hospital discharge. Within the first year of discharge, 58% (n = 111) of subjects had at least one hospitalization with a median length of stay of 8 days [IQR 3-19]. Of subjects who did not follow commands at hospital discharge, 5/43 (11%) followed commands and 9 (21%) were reportedly living at home on subsequent encounters.
Of survivors treated over a decade at our institution, 20% (n = 190) were discharged from the hospital with severe functional disability. One-year mortality was 38%, and hospital readmissions were frequent. Few patients discharged unable to follow commands regained the ability over the period of observation, but many did return to living at home. These data can help inform decision maker expectations for patient trajectory and life expectancy.
从心脏骤停中复苏过来的患者在出院时存在严重的神经或功能障碍,需要高强度的长期支持。然而,很少有数据描述这些患者的长期生存和医疗保健利用情况。
我们确定了一组年龄≥18 岁的心脏骤停幸存者,他们在宾夕法尼亚州西部的一家单一中心接受治疗,从 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,出院时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分为 5。我们记录了人口统计学、心脏骤停特征和出院时的神经检查结果。我们通过国家死亡指数查询,截至 2020 年 12 月 31 日,描述了长期生存和死亡率。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线描述了总体和亚组的生存时间,并使用对数秩检验进行了比较。我们将病例与行政数据相关联,以确定 30 天、90 天和 1 年的住院再入院率。对于出院时无法听从命令的受试者,我们回顾了索引住院期间到现在的记录,以描述神经状态的改善和返回家中。
我们筛选了 2687 名患者,其中 975 名存活至出院。我们确定了 190 名出院时 mRS 评分为 5 的患者,他们被送往非临终关怀机构。其中,43 名(23%)出院时无法听从命令。1 年死亡率为 38%(n=71),中位生存时间为 4.2 年(IQR 0.3-10.9)。年龄较大的受试者的生存时间较短,但在出院时能否听从命令、性别或能力方面没有差异。出院后的第一年,58%(n=111)的患者至少有一次住院,中位住院时间为 8 天[IQR 3-19]。在出院时无法听从命令的受试者中,有 5/43(11%)听从了命令,9 人(21%)在随后的随访中被报告住在家里。
在我们机构接受治疗超过 10 年的幸存者中,20%(n=190)出院时存在严重的功能障碍。1 年死亡率为 38%,住院再入院率频繁。出院时无法听从命令的少数患者在观察期间恢复了能力,但许多患者确实返回家中居住。这些数据可以帮助决策者了解患者轨迹和预期寿命。