Factors associated with diabetic macular edema in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with diabetic macular edema (DME) and to characterize the types of DME present in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

Observational, retrospective case series of PDR patients reviewed for demographic information, general medical history, ophthalmologic history, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiogram image characteristics. DME and vitreomacular interface (VMI) status were determined using OCT images. DME was defined as center-involving DME (CI-DME) and noncenter-involving DME (NCI-DME). VMI was defined as vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), or macular posterior vitreous detachment (PVD).

RESULTS

A total of 293 eyes of 210 screened patients with PDR were included. Of the eyes, 194/293 (66.2%) had DME, and 99/293 (33.8%) had no DME; in univariable analysis, there were no significant differences in VMI status (p = 0.4) or epiretinal membrane (ERM, p = 0.1) between them. Of 194 eyes with DME, 90/194 (46.4%) had CI-DME, and 104/194 (53.6%) had NCI-DME. In univariable analysis, CI-DME eyes were significantly more likely than NCI-DME eyes to have a PVD (p = 0.029) and ERM (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the presence of younger age (p = 0.028) and presence of ERM (p = 0.001) were significantly more likely to be observed in eyes with CI-DME.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory study focused on diabetic patients with PDR, we determined that VMI status did not have a significant association with DME in general, but VMI status, younger age, and presence of ERM may be associated with CI-DME.