Diversity and Evolution, Department Ecology and Evolution, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Institute of Ecology, Max-von-Laue Str. 13, DE-60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre SBiK-F, Georg-Voigt Str. 14-16, DE-60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
BMC Genomics. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08363-5.
global trade in living plants and plant material has significantly increased the geographic distribution of many plant pathogens. As a consequence, several pathogens have been first found and described in their introduced range where they may cause severe damage on naïve host species. Knowing the center of origin and the pathways of spread of a pathogen is of importance for several reasons, including identifying natural enemies and reducing further spread. Several Phytophthora species are well-known invasive pathogens of natural ecosystems, including Phytophthora multivora. Following the description of P. multivora from dying native vegetation in Australia in 2009, the species was subsequently found to be common in South Africa where it does not cause any remarkable disease. There are now reports of P. multivora from many other countries worldwide, but not as a commonly encountered species in natural environments.
a global collection of 335 isolates from North America, Europe, Africa, Australia, the Canary Islands, and New Zealand was used to unravel the worldwide invasion history of P. multivora, using 10 microsatellite markers for all isolates and sequence data from five loci from 94 representative isolates. Our population genetic analysis revealed an extremely low heterozygosity, significant non-random association of loci and substantial genotypic diversity suggesting the spread of P. multivora readily by both asexual and sexual propagules. The P. multivora populations in South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand show the most complex genetic structure, are well established and evolutionary older than those in Europe, North America and the Canary Islands.
according to the conducted analyses, the world invasion of P. multivora most likely commenced from South Africa, which can be considered the center of origin of the species. The pathogen was then introduced to Australia, which acted as bridgehead population for Europe and North America. Our study highlights a complex global invasion pattern of P. multivora, including both direct introductions from the native population and secondary spread/introductions from bridgehead populations.
活体植物和植物材料的全球贸易极大地增加了许多植物病原体的地理分布。因此,一些病原体在引入地区首次被发现和描述,在那里它们可能对天真的宿主物种造成严重破坏。了解病原体的起源中心和传播途径很重要,原因包括识别自然天敌和减少进一步传播。几种疫霉属物种是天然生态系统中众所周知的入侵性病原体,包括多黏疫霉。2009 年,在澳大利亚死亡的本地植被中首次描述了多黏疫霉之后,该物种随后在南非被发现很常见,但在南非它不会引起任何显著的疾病。现在全球许多其他国家都有关于多黏疫霉的报告,但在自然环境中并不常见。
使用来自北美的 335 个分离物的全球集合,欧洲、非洲、澳大利亚、加那利群岛和新西兰,使用 10 个微卫星标记对所有分离物进行了分析,并从 94 个代表性分离物的五个基因座获得了序列数据,以揭示多黏疫霉的全球入侵历史。我们的种群遗传分析显示,极低的杂合度、显著的非随机关联和大量的基因型多样性表明,多黏疫霉的传播很容易通过无性和有性繁殖体进行。南非、澳大利亚和新西兰的多黏疫霉种群显示出最复杂的遗传结构,已经建立并且比欧洲、北美和加那利群岛的种群进化得更早。
根据进行的分析,多黏疫霉的世界入侵很可能始于南非,南非可以被认为是该物种的起源中心。然后,病原体被引入澳大利亚,澳大利亚成为欧洲和北美的桥头堡种群。我们的研究强调了多黏疫霉复杂的全球入侵模式,包括来自本地种群的直接引入和来自桥头堡种群的二次传播/引入。