Bamdad Shahram, Ahmad Razavizadegan Seyyed, Farvardin Mohsen, Mohaghegh Sahar
Poostchi ophthalmology research center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Optometry, School of rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):19-26. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i1.10166. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
To evaluate vision-related quality of life in two sets of patients after routine cataract surgery implanting with traditional versus multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs).
In a cross-sectional prospective study, 58 and 33 candidates for cataract surgery were divided into traditional (Acrysof SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc) and multifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL TFNT00, Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) groups, respectively. The primary outcome was VFQ-25 scores. The secondary outcomes were making comparisons between the two IOL types in the near vision and the driving items.
mean patients' age in traditional and multifocal IOL groups was 60.85 7.40 (55% female) and 59.85 8.95 (36% female) years, respectively. The mean VFQ-25 total scores in traditional and multifocal IOL groups before and after surgery were 63.69 4.95 and 72.15 9.66, and 98.08 0.70 and 95.70 1.30, respectively ( 0.001 & 0.001). The mean scores of night driving in traditional and multifocal IOL groups were 38.79 20.50 and 44.35 21.12 ( = 0.1) before surgery which improved to 97.41 7.68 and 56.45 11.12 after surgery, respectively ( 0.001). The mean scores of near vision in traditional and multifocal IOL groups were 46.83 10.56 and 50.53 8.58 ( = 0.2) before surgery which improved to 89.94 4.87 and 100.00 0.00 after surgery, respectively ( = 0.001).
Vision-related quality of life after cataract surgery with either type of traditional or multifocal (PanOptix) IOLs improved to an excellent level. Traditional IOLs provided more satisfaction in nighttime driving while multifocal IOLs provided increased satisfaction in near and intermediate vision.
评估两组患者在常规白内障手术后植入传统型与多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)后的视力相关生活质量。
在一项横断面前瞻性研究中,58名和33名白内障手术候选者分别被分为传统IOL组(爱尔康公司的Acrysof SN60WF)和多焦点IOL组(爱尔康公司的AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL TFNT00)。主要结局指标为VFQ - 25评分。次要结局指标是比较两种IOL类型在近视力和驾驶项目方面的差异。
传统IOL组和多焦点IOL组患者的平均年龄分别为60.85±7.40岁(女性占55%)和59.85±8.95岁(女性占36%)。传统IOL组和多焦点IOL组手术前后的平均VFQ - 25总分分别为63.69±4.95和72.15±9.66,以及98.08±0.70和95.70±1.30(P<0.001和P<0.001)。传统IOL组和多焦点IOL组术前夜间驾驶的平均得分分别为38.79±20.50和44.35±21.12(P = 0.1),术后分别提高到97.41±7.68和56.45±11.12(P<0.001)。传统IOL组和多焦点IOL组术前近视力的平均得分分别为46.83±10.56和50.53±8.58(P = 0.2),术后分别提高到89.94±4.87和100.00±0.00(P = 0.001)。
白内障手术后,使用传统型或多焦点(PanOptix)IOL的视力相关生活质量均提高到了优秀水平。传统IOL在夜间驾驶方面提供了更高的满意度,而多焦点IOL在近视力和中距离视力方面提供了更高的满意度。